Why is Kid A considered so innovative when Homogenic came out

I don't think anyone really thinks Kid A is innovative though. It takes the framework of SAW 85-92 and has everything from Bjork to Talk Talk to Penderecki to Can happening in it.

Because Kid A actually sold

>>73809573
bjork never made a simple pop song like radiohead did creep or bends.

bjork has always been weird. following kate bush steps.

>>73809636
>bjork never made a simple pop song
uhhhhhhhhhh

>>73809636
>bjork never made a simple pop song
ok

because Radiohead was a rock band and going from Ok Computer to Kid A is a drastic stylistic change

>>73809573
because rockist critics existed, and rockists are cancer

>>73809682
>>73809697
>meme replies
>no proof
everytime

>>73809730
>>no proof
her first two albums are literal proof, especially debut

>>73809730
whats the difference between grimesfags and bjorkfags again?

>>73809749
are you kidding me?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDbPYoaAiyc
show me a pop song in that same year that sounded like this

>>73809728
Rockists love Bjork though.

>>73809796
yeah like trip-hop/downtempo influenced dance pop is not one of the most popular things in the mainsteam music of the early 90s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyhdvRWEWRw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz6yxSe4iEI
btw those songs were released before human behavior

>>73809965
that makes it even worse for bjork. fucking madonna is more invented than her. no wonder kid a got props.

>>73809828
Do they love her more than a rock band?

>>73810105
Rockism doesn't mean "likes rock music."

File: folder.jpg (567KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 1000x1000px

This is the real proto-Kid A

>>73810170
Not exclusively, but you see my point.

>>73810200
Another Green World would like a word.