This album was so fucking ahead of its time in so many fucking

>>>/watmm/

>>73808375
How was it ahead of its time?

>>73809287
the artwork, the stylings, it's all right in line with the sort of deconstructive music OPN, Arca, Ferraro, etc. started making in the 10's. it's focused more in abstraction and transfiguration of sounds than it is in soundscapes with Confield

File: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>>73809327
>the artwork, the stylings, it's all right in line with the sort of deconstructive music OPN, Arca, Ferraro, etc. started making in the 10's

autechre sucks. bad composition, overall aesthetic, and sound design. complete failure of an electronic group

>>73809362
good argument
>>73809387
the fuck are you talking about

>>73809421
my post was pretty straight forward bub

>>73809421
your taste in bleep music is shit

>>73809438
>>73809443
Explain how autechre are bad in composition, aesthetic, and sound design.

>>73808375
>>73809327
t. one of those people who unironically believe that electronic music was invented by aphex twin

>>73809463
elektroniche music was specific to Radio Cologne but music using electronic assistance has existed for quite a while.

>>73809443
autechre are bleep now? who knew

>>73809458
it's boring and lacks any catchy or groovy rhythm/melody and is borderline random notes, it doesn't create a good overall sound, nor are individual sounds interesting

>>73809543
I'm sorry what
music has to be catchy to be good?
music has to sound like Aphex to be good?
christ anon you sound like a total pleb

>>73809525
Autechre make dance music

>>73809585
not him, but Autechre are literally a pleb-magnet

>>73809598
good argument

>>73809585
not necessarily catchy but it has to be something
>good aesthetic/sound design = sounds like aphex
and i'm the pleb?
explain to me what makes autechre worth anyone's time musically

>>73809612
It's so obvious I don't see what I need to prove at this point

>>73809620
>but it has to be something
What is "something?"
>explain to me what makes autechre worth anyone's time musically
to do that I would have to assume you know anything about 20thC art or music, which you don't.

>>73809649
yeah you've got nothing [just like autechre]

>>73809662
So tell me what you think of Stockhausen's Studie II, or Kontakte?

>>73809680
trash that doesn't sound good in the least. not surprised an autechre fan would enjoy it though.

>>73809543
>lacks any catchy or groovy rhythm/melody
That's completely wrong though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmhvTVQ0qts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JT0m_-al-B8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfTAv8htci8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxN9IZ005WU
The list goes on

>>73809680
Those were revolutionary work for their times
Comparing Stockhausen to Autechre is the ultimate proof that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about

>>73809715
So if music doesn't fit your standard of 300+year ago aesthetic standards it's bad
so you really don't know anything abou tmusic huh

>>73809737
I'm asking you if their lack of a "groove" or catchiness makes them bad

>>73809747
>if you don't appreciate random notes with nothing interesting about them then you know nothing about music
ok bub

>>73809756
I wasn't the anon with whom you were arguing, but this comparison is completely stupid

>>73809765
If you honestly can't understand why Kontakte is a masterpiece of music then yeah, you're clueless
>>73809784
yeah if you're thinking of it in a really teenager way like "OH SHIT IS HE SAYING AUTECHRE IS AS COMPLEX AS STOCKHAUSEN"
of fucking course not, now leave. you don't understand.

>>73809801
>you don't understand.
Hah, ironic isn't it

>>73809387
i like these kinds of opinions
so absolutely clear what kind of person you are

>>73810032
yeah, someone who enjoys music that sounds good and doesn't enjoy music that sounds bad

>>73810084
Autechre sounds good though

>>73810084
so is everyone

>>73809543
>>73809620
>>73810084
t. summerfag pleb who discovered autechre in 2013 after exai

>>73810140
summerfag plebs all love Autechre

>>73810166
>n-no u

>>73810185
It's the truth though
Autechre is babby's first bleep

>>73810216
good

>>73810140
all these high sodium content posts. stop constantly memeing people into listening to a bad band if you don't want people to come back and tell you it sucks

i would have thought opn fans would like autechre

>>73809327
anon, take solace in the fact everyone replying to you is too scared to share their own opinions

File: 1492704174635.jpg (57KB, 577x1024px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 577x1024px

>>73809327
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

pic is u

I used to think anti-electronic fags were just retards when they would say things like "electronic music lacks emotion/substance" but then i found autechre and realized that is what they're referring to. They're still retards for thinking all electronic music is like this though.

File: artofnoise.jpg (39KB, 500x488px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x488px

>>73809327
OPN and Ferraro are closer in styling to Art of Noise than they are to Autechre

>>73810783
that's an unusual cover for art of noise though

>>73811264
Due to lack of masks?

>>73811311
yeah lol

>>73811319
Yeah, I know what you mean. Definitely my favorite album of theirs, though, even though it's technically a comp

>>73811330
i'll check it out
think i've got most of theirs but you never know

>>73811352
Any rec's for similar?

>>73811390
have you heard stella by yello? that's got a good fairlight sound to it

>>73811421
Not yet. I'm going to find a copy. I'm jumping through some clips now and it sounds like something I'd enjoy. Thank you

Quaristice sounds like any other Autechre record. Autechre should reinvent themselves, every album of them sounds the same.

>>73811829
0/10

>>73811842
>deaf fanboys

Quaristice is probably the worst ae record.

>>73808375
Autechre records are purchased solely by bald men in expensive anoraks who would masturbate to a car alarm if it was mixed by a German

Their music is an impenetrable curtain of misanthropic noise. Hopeless pretentious. These menopausal electro-manglers' refuse to bow to convention and produce anything of interest to anyone not either a) bald or b) German.

It bleeps. It skronks. It krrrraaaaaanks. But mainly, it blows like a ruddy awful hurricane

Remember, kids, if it sounds like a festering hillock of tune-shy bun wank, it's because it IS a festering hillock of tine-shy bum-wank. Avoid as you would a bald German

>>73811880
This is what happens, when NME tries to be funny.

>>73811880
Reddit humor has arrived

File: 5002066.jpg (19KB, 300x263px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x263px

>not posting (versions)