"They replaced lusty negro attitudes with cute white-kid

beach boys were better

THE

FACT

>>73806455
Dubs speak the truth

File: john-lennon-9379045-2-402.jpg (161KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1200x1200px

>i have two personalities...

File: ringo.jpg (7KB, 230x188px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 230x188px

>>73806476
consider suicide

>>73807426
Why? It's true

>>73807521
Here (You) go

File: john-lennon.jpg (96KB, 1015x1014px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1015x1014px

>>73807244
One, I beat my wife.

>>73807533
Pet Sounds had a greater impact than any Beatles album by default.

>>73807533
>>73807426
pleb

>>73807624
It had less of an impact than fucking Help!

>(not true, by the way)

>>73807574
The other?

>>73808054
...what other?

>>73807624
>this is what skinnyfat virgins actually believe
Pet Sounds is the most overrated piece of trash ever recorded. All the songs have the same moods, the same arrangements, the same bland, faceless instrumentation by 400 corporate yes men session hacks, and the whiny voices. Funny how Brian Wilson wrote lyrics about surfing without even knowing how to swim, and then about love without even seeing a naked woman (Beach Boys were uglier than the Byrds, Al Jardine was a monstrosity)

File: the beatles - pepper sounds.png (742KB, 675x674px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 675x674px

>>73808479
scaruffi thinks the same thing, pet sounds was much better and more influential, and in general people with good taste (so not you) think the same.

>>73808845
Naturalmente Pet Sounds fu il meno venduto di tutti i loro album. Pet Sounds e` anche uno degli album piu` sopravvalutati di sempre.

"Of course Pet Sounds was the least-sold of all their albums. Pet Sounds is also one of the most overrated albums ever."

>>73808871
>>73808871
>The Beach Boys started the fire: they fused the four-part harmonies of vocals groups like the Four Freshmen with Chuck Berry's rock and roll rhythm and a new genre was born. The Beatles, the Byrds and countless others copied the idea and the history of popular music would never be the same again.

>Rather than an album of psychedelic music (compared to which it actually sounds retro), Sgt. Pepper was the Beatles' answer to the sophistication of Pet Sounds, the masterpiece by their rivals, the Beach Boys, released a year and three months before. The Beatles had always been obsessed by the Beach Boys. They had copied their multi-part harmonies, their melodic style and their carefree attitude. Throughout their entire career, from 1963 to 1968, the Beatles actually followed the Beach Boys within a year or two, including the formation of Apple Records, which came almost exactly one year after the birth of Brother Records. Pet Sounds had caused an uproar because it delivered the simple melodies of surf music through the artistic sophistication of the studio. So, following the example of Pet Sounds, the Beatles recorded, from February to May 1967, Sgt. Pepper, disregarding two important factors: first that Pet Sounds had been arranged, mixed and produced by Brian Wilson and not by an external producer like George Martin, and second that, as always, they were late. They began assembling Sgt. Pepper a year after Pet Sounds had hit the charts, and after dozens of records had already been influenced by it.

>>73808908
>Beach Boys invented multi-part harmonies

Scaruffi has the musical opinion of an adding machine.

>>73807533
>>73807426
Literally no one talked about or even liked The Beatles on this board a year ago

It's sad that it's come to this

>>73808908
>dozens of records had already been influenced by it
>as always, [The Beatles] were late

Is Scaruffi mentally handicapped or is he just blissfully ignorant of the fact that Brian had put out nothing close to the Beatles before Pet Sounds, or the fact that the album itself was a response to the far more successful Revolver?

Fuck contrarian plebs.

Pet Sounds > Magical Mystery Tour > Sgt Pepper >>> Revolver > everything else

Unfortunately the vast majority of both discographies is pure garbage.