If you dismiss any genre in its entirety, you are definitively

>>73702297
Best Louis Armstrong song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnoCI2N9nWw

>>73702297
>sound poetry
Looks like mr.pleb thinks he knows more than he really does

>>73702297
the human musical endeavor is a meme propagated by buttmad nu males looking to justify their shitty tastes

>>73702415
>mr. pleb
Shit mate how'll he ever recover?

This is true

>>73702297
Wrong. If you think "jazz" "classical" "rock" "folk" "electronic" "hip-hop" or "sound poetry" are genres, you're a pleb.

>>73702578
All these are genres
except for Classical which is an era and should be referred as Western Art Music and "Electronic" which is a loose term that means absolutely nothing

>>73702641
"Western Art Music" means nothing. You don't know what you're talking about.

>>73702297
Metal and trap. It may have something to offer to some people musically, but as music is subjective, and I subjectively dislike metal, I have the right to dismiss it in its intirety.

>>73702641
>art music

>>73702671
Oh, and you do? Enlighten me then, how do we classify """"""""""""""Classical""""""""""""""""""" music then?

File: 1497143685680.png (11KB, 156x168px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 156x168px

>>73702578
Tell that to wikipedia and the oxford dictionary definition of those genres you mentioned

>>73702697
A word used to catalog CD's at Tower Records.

>>73702699
>I swallow every drop of pigslop wikipedia serve me

How about you let music be defined by itself rather than allowing marketing executives tell you what to think.

>>73702578
>>73702774

This is exactly what I was actually saying in the OP, the music can't be reduced and dismissed by those genres' labels. You're making my point for me. Don't be a pedantic autist.

>>73702683
I think you'd be able to find metal you like if you looked hard enough. As for trap, I generally agree with you but I've been able to find one or two I like that are actually kinda creative. Also it's a young genre so...

I think one can still safely dismiss crunkcore.

>>73702818
Listened from black sabbath to sunbather, from young thug to soundcloud trap kids, haven't found a thing. Maybe it's actually just not for me?

>>73702949
You're putting too much emphasis on "liking" things. Not everything is about you.

>>73702774
>How about you let music be defined by itself rather than allowing marketing executives tell you what to think.
What the fuck kind of gibberish is this? First, I don't think Wikipedia was written by marketing executives. Second, the function of genre names isn't rigorous taxonomy so much as a convenient shorthand for describing things. They're generalizations, and thus by definition not exactly correct, but they're still useful.

>>73702297
>If you dismiss any genre in its entirety, you are definitively a pleb. Jazz, classical, rock, folk, 'electronic', hip hop, sound poetry, *all* of these genres have *something* to offer the human musical endeavor.


Tell me a good tonefield album

>>73702297
>*all* of these genres have *something* to offer the human musical endeavor.
Like what? What does hip hop have to offer artistically?

>>73702984
>album
begone rockist vermin

>>73702969
I didn't say Wikipedia was. I said those words in OP were made up by marketing executives in order to catalog CD's in a store-front record shop. Those don't exist anymore so the terms you're so emotionally attached to don't reflect reality as it is. And it's a shame people are so emotionally attached to those words, as if you've built your entire persona around it.