Is it any different than the original version? Should I listen

>>73530075
it's cooler
and the 3 songs are bretty damn good

>>73530075

There's no difference in the original songs other than that they are remasters so the sound better. I listened to the whole thing because I love this album and it feels pretty good to go back to it after a fair few years desu

The new tracks and b-sides are great. The remaster sounds a tiny bit better. It's definitely worth it.

Should I replace normal OK Computer with OKNOTOK though?

>>73530285
I personally wouldn't

i only downloaded disk two

will never listen to remasters of the album

fight me

>>73530285
You may as well

File: DClwvIiXsAAoMHq.jpg (86KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 720x960px

>>73530075
Are you retarded ? Can you not make this decision for yourself ?

>>73531018
>>73530793

Whats the synthesis?

>>73530979
y

>>73530120
They sound worse.

>>73530285
just make it disc 2

>>73531126
remasters are like having sex with condom

>>73531969
Your parents wish they had.

Did anyone buy the special edition? They keep making those things more and more expensive and it's hard to justify buying one.

File: bananaphone.png (178KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 500x500px

>criticize capitalism
>reissue the album with extra songs

>>73532049
>buying music
classic geriatric Radiohead fan

>>73532097
>not supporting the art form you supposedly care about

>>73532097
(((You)))

>>73532139
Music sucks now, I want it to die.

>>73532159
Ironic man, nice, me likey

>>73530075
They should've just made OK Computer and then disbanded.

>>73532086
I don't think OKC is a straight criticsm to capitalism, but more like a Bauman liquid society view of modern life.

>>73531985
go back

>>73531904
>

As much as I would prefer RH's catalog to be full of >DR10 albums, I really did not notice a DR difference in this remaster. The improvements made to the songs are easily worth it.

>>73532405
It's too hi-fi.

>>73530089
>>73530135
I Promise was always kind of boring and Big Boots is kinda lifeless. I can see why they abandoned it for the soundtrack.

Lift is nice though. Would be interesting to hear the Kid A version.

>>73530979
Same, but this album is the one exception for me. OKC has a really cold sound to me and I was hoping that with a remaster OKnOK would have a different tone, nope.

>>73532261
yeah pretty much. it's not a political album at all really, it's pretty inward focused and existential

>>73532638
let down and no surprises sound cold to you?

>>73532653
have you listened to a song named electioneering?

>>73532695
that's the one exception i think. and that's not an outright criticism of capitalism, it's about democratic popularity contests

>>73532780
it was influenced by chomsky so i have a feeling thom wasn't so keen on capitalism

>>73532665
Tonally they are pretty "cold", yes.

>>73532665
different poster but yeah definitely

the only song anywhere near "warmth" is the tourist

>>73532891
>>73533044
yeah and you don't have "down syndrome"

>>73531969
how in any way are they like that? please explain your analogy

>>73533228
Imagine being this mad that someone disagreed with you over something this trivial

Do the remastered songs sound better?

>>73533511
It's probably down to personal preference. The original album never sounded like it was in need of a remastering, but I'm enjoying listening to it again.

Just download it and decide for yourself.

>>73533644
Is there a difference?

>>73532222
But I like amnesiac and kid a :(

>>73533684
you probably wont notice anything unless you either know the original like the back of your hand or compare each song directly.
it doesn't sound worse so you may aswell just download it

>>73532222
No they shouldn't have

>>73533707
Climbing up the walls is worse.

File: 1496827414768.jpg (85KB, 500x392px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 500x392px

>>73532222
breaking news: quads are wrong

>>73533723
it just isn't

>>73533732
Too quiet, too clean.

File: 1496190906263.jpg (58KB, 500x508px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x508px

>>73533723
>>73533732
gentlemen there seems to be a disagreement, i will hear your arguments and decide who is correct without bias

>>73533790
fuck off

File: 1496243835262.jpg (3KB, 126x121px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 126x121px

>>73533807
i hereby declare this anon is irrevocably wrong

>>73533819
Not me, woo hoo fuck the remaster.

>>73533869
winrar congrats

literally what was the point of the remaster, the only thing I noticed were the drums during the verse in airbag

>>73534220
The original was louder.

>>73534295
so the improvement is now that when I have my library on shuffle I get my ears blown out when it goes to the next song?

>>73534499
>original was louder
>hurr durr so now my ears are going to blow out?

the retard in its natural habitat, everyone

The remastered version of Let Down sounds a lot better for me. Clearer bass, also the arpeggio synth that begins playing at the end of the song starts at the middle now, so it's good.

>>73534570
>turn up volume to listen to quieter remastered song
>next song comes on at increased volume

imagine being this stupid

>>73534674
It was always there tho

Has anyone uploaded the download for the tape that comes with the box set? I'd like to listen to it, mainly because someone said it apparently has the OK Computer version of "Nude" and "Last Flowers" on it

>>73532222
kys

File: 1389216106888.png (2MB, 1786x1030px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1786x1030px

>>73534727
>not using Replaygain

Why no the bends remaster in 2015?

>>73531969
that doesn't make any sense