>"michelle ma belle, these are words that go together

>everybody seem to think i'm lazy
>i don't mind, i think they're crazy

>I used to be cruel to my woman
>I beat her and kept apart from the things that she loved

At least John was honest

File: chvrches-vid.jpg (97KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1500x1000px

>hey now give that sand a shove
>you gotta bury it and rise above
Wow! Amazing! Good job Chvrches

>>73511341
That was Paul's song stupid

>>73511563
How do I know which song is by which Beatle?

>>73511578
They sing them

>>73511563
Yeah but John wrote some of its lyrics

>HES A REAL NOWHERE MAN
>SITTING IN HIS NOWHERE LAND

The Beatles are a decent band. But I never understood the hype.

>Baby you can drive my car
>Yes I'm gonna be a star
>Baby you can drive my car
>And maybe I love you
>BEEP BEEP YEA

>>73513258
They revolutionised music and influenced everyone that came after them

>>73513258
they made really good music.

File: 1461359448906.jpg (6KB, 220x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 220x200px

>>73511079
>I get high with a little help from my friends
Why was this allowed?

>>73511563
With John's input

>>73513278
wouldn't it make more sense to worship whatever influenced The Beatles, then?

I never understood the obligation to worship something on the basis of being influential. It all constantly cycles backward and backward and backward and backward so what's the point?

>Ob-la-di ob-la-da life goes on bra
>Lala how the life goes on

2deep4me

>>73514632
crippling autism on /mu/
why am I not surprised

>>73514632
people do, but more people worship the beatles, because the beatles were bigger

biggest band + influential = most influential band

those lyrics are meant to mock people who try to pick up girls using French tho

>>73511079
one of these days you'll understand that the power of simplicity is a big part of pop music's appeal and there's nothing wrong with that