WTF I LOVE RECORD LABEL CREATED RNB/POP GIRL GROUPS FROM

>>73429436
YASSSSSS QUEEEENSSS SLAYYYY

STRONG INDEPENDENT BLACK WOMEN UNITE
YASSSS

>>73429436
It's at least a garillion/10

racists

is this proof that p4k has white guilt

Say my name, say my name
If no one is around you
Say baby I love you
If you ain't runnin' game
Say my name, say my name
You actin' kinda shady
Ain't callin' me baby
Why the sudden change
Say my name, say my name
If no one is around you
Say baby I love you
If you ain't runnin' game
Say my name, say my name
You actin' kinda shady
Ain't callin' me baby
Why the sudden change

>>73429513
also shit taste, if that wasnt already obvious

deadass destiny's child is good

>>73429577
yes, but their albums generally aren't. this one isn't good. survivor is pretty good

>>73429436
Pitchfork has been Rolling Stones-tier this entire decade, only worth reading if you are into an artist and want to see another point of view about an album you enjoy by them.

There's clearly an agenda pitchforks been trying to push since 2010...

women are so gross

>>73429577
>deadass
kringe

>>73429741
>Pitchfork has been Rolling Stones-tier this entire decade
only since 2016 tbqh

Christ
Fucking NME is better than pitchfork at this point

File: IMG_1003.jpg (100KB, 506x365px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 506x365px

Trying to ride this wave

AY YO DIS OPINION IS WACK YALL

DIS WEBSITE IS WACK

>>73429436

1 am in the morning... Listening to a destiny's child album from 17 years ago.

So much nostalgia, and I wouldn't give it a 9, but it's pretty fucking good for what it is

>>73429436
Are they for real? Wew lad. I knew p4k was shitty, but this is just sad. Good thing I never was invested in that terrible site.

Ah but for the days when Beyonce was simply a harmless pop singer listened to by 11 year old girls and gay men...

>>73429577
>deadass
stop acting like a nigger

File: 1468953234697.gif (12KB, 250x242px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x242px

>>73429436
we all know pitchfork was in decline at least since 2013 but the conde nast acquisition really raped and killed it
what's the point talking about their reviews, it's not even ironic anymore.

>>73429436
>he thinks he doesn't listen to record label, image based music
Stay oblivious, /mu/

>>73429436
how come they only review black artists now in their "classics" review

Stop posting nmefork it's ruining this board

>>73430672
Got given a free copy of the "new NME" a few weeks back. It was shit, still better than the state Pitchfork is in now though.

>>73432698
pitchfork is still better than nme you fucking retard

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-18 at 8.21.21 AM.png (155KB, 1192x392px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1192x392px

WTF I LOVE GENERIC "INDIE" FOLK NOW

>>73429436
Pitchfork died like in 2011-2012. That Melon guy is more relevant today.

itt:nobody explains why they dislike destiny child

its a classic album but you white boys never listened to it anyway.

>>73429436
Pitchfork is not longer reliable. I much prefer RYM or The Needle Drop in that sense.

>>73429468
What a tool you are

>>73433494
Good on you for dragging race into it, this really makes me want to have a discussion with you

>>73433574
>being this triggered by your own pasty skin

Wew

>>73432202
you first

>>73429436
Calm down, they literally just did this because she just have birth.

But yeah, p4k is basically Rolling Stone now and every Lil pee and Lil Poop is gonna get a 7.0+.

>>73433574
i aint talking to you white boy. fuck off

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-16 at 9.18.19 PM.png (131KB, 1184x362px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1184x362px

>>73433629
huh?

>>73429436
>"hey let's review mainstream music people already listened to and so already know EXACTLY how it is"


I want to know what reviews (assumed they werent paid by the label) think when they do that

File: 2017-04-23 12.10.35.jpg (340KB, 1064x1066px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1064x1066px

>>73433662
Like another anon said, they didn't get really bad until the Conde Nast takeover in like 2016.

>ever giving a shit about internet critics

Which one is Beyoncé?

File: 1320263922126.jpg (28KB, 400x299px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x299px

>getting unironically mad at an album you haven't even listened to

What went so wrong in your childhood?

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-18 at 9.24.00 AM 1.png (237KB, 1285x566px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1285x566px

>>73433687
huh?

>>73433707
>Thugger clone gets 6.6

Still way too high desu.

>>73433707
Post 5 more examples.

>>73433733
but you said all of them get 7.0'+ ?

>>73433690
what do you think you cocksucking retard

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-18 at 9.23.43 AM.png (252KB, 1315x595px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1315x595px

>>73433741

>>73429436
kek nice shoop

show us the real score pls

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-18 at 9.31.29 AM.png (136KB, 1290x573px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1290x573px

and here's number 5

>>73429513
It's proof that p4k are shills who have been bought and paid for by the major labels

>>73433677
>>"hey let's review mainstream music people already listened to and so already know EXACTLY how it is"
>I want to know what reviews (assumed they werent paid by the label) think when they do that


Do you know those youtube personalities that give opinion about stuff and some people like to listen to their opinions? I am not talking about scientists talking about science or other stuff like this, but normal people giving opinion about stuff.


Some see music reviews as something like that.

So they watch the youtube personality talking about the thing they already saw and used, and will do the same with reviews

>>73433761
that fat white bitch next to him always makes me laugh

the world need to remember TLC alright? fucking send it out now

>>73429436
>reviewed by a woman

>>73433662
>literally one of the sole good things to come out of trap
>gets a significantly lower score than Big Ni$$a Money 26
why is pitchfork real
also, why did Kendrick's possible weakest effort get a better score than A Crow Looked At Me, one of the most beautifully genuine albums I've ever heard? It's hard to sit through because you can really tell he loved her. It's painful in a way, but it's just as he intended I suppose. Plus, not all good art should make you feel good.

>posts 6 examples of black artists getting less than 7
>thread gets silence
everytime

>>73433819
both kendrick and mount eerie are bad anon

you're wasting your time

>>73433819
do you really think they're reviewing all of these strictly based off of artistic merit??

DAMN is going to place higher on my year-end list than the new Mount Eerie btw. More replayability and more variety gain more points in my book than emotional impact, in this case.

>>73433857
it's every time* you foreign piece of shit

>>73433819
Stop listening to music for the lyrics

>>73433819
> A Crow Looked At Me, one of the most beautifully genuine albums I've ever heard?
Is this the cringe thread?

>>73433881
everytime

>>73433819
>one of the most beautifully genuine albums I've ever heard

well aren't you just a nice cute little virgin

File: 1490725125100.jpg (19KB, 456x402px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 456x402px

>>73433819
>why did Kendrick's possible weakest effort get a better score than A Crow Looked At Me
You know why anon...you know

>>73433857
The thread is still going, and that's not even what the thread is about

>>73433819
do you think you listen to real music because you're not a katy perry but a mount eerie fan? kill yourself you ugly fuck

>>73433912
no its exactly what its about. this board is obsessed with thinking black = auto high score.

>>73433819
This post was really tough to swallow holy shit. Imagine being this desperate for a nookie.

File: 5aaf7385fa.jpg (59KB, 475x594px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 475x594px

>>73433819
eat my ass out virgin boi

>>73433924
That's generally what happens with Pitchfork.

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-18 at 9.48.54 AM.png (165KB, 1280x400px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1280x400px

>>73433955
explain this then

>>73433963
"Black = higher score" doesn't necessarily imply "white = lower score"

>>73433982
yeah yeah keep making up the rules as you go.

File: 1406579024301.jpg (51KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x540px

>>73433991

>>73434022
>keeps reaction images saved on his pc

>>73434022
is this suppose to be a self-drag?

>>73433991
Rules?
The subject at hand is niggers getting higher scores because they're black
A good album by a white artist getting a good rating has nothing to do with it

>>73434063
diiv isn't good. nice racism tho!

File: 544.png (220KB, 373x327px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 373x327px

>>73433889
>>73433901
>>73433905
>>73433950

not even him but christ

>>73434074
>edgy

kill yourself you cuck loving cocksucker

>>73434070
Nice bad taste and Tumblr sensibilities!

>>73434100
>diiv
>good
thx for the laugh

>>73434132
ignore that gayboy he's mentally ill and just discovered guitar oriented music favorited by pitchfork

>>73433747
Literally none of those four women on the cover look like her

>>73433557
he's not wrong

File: 5805623.jpg (97KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 960x960px

>>73434258
can you see it now?

>>73433748
Top of 2016, before Conde Nast aquisition. Still a high score for trash music.

>>73433754
Bryson Tiller isn't a meme rapper.

>>73433761
They hate Yachty for some reason. Still a high score.

>>73433765
>>73433774
Not meme rappers.

>>73433857
It's not black artists, just meme rappers.

>>73433687
should've been higher

>>73435679
Please tell us why you think it should be higher.