John's generally considered the best Beatle by most people, right? Would he be considered the best Beatle if he didn't get shot? I'd say probably yes, but not as much as he is.
not as much the best
ok, thanks for that
>>73340860
yes, the bullet was really talented.
>>73340874
What I mean is he'd probably still be considered the best, but he wouldn't be has idolised as he is and McCartney would be a closer second
>>73340860
John was the icon, and gave the band direction, but George was the visionary musical talent. Shows through in his solo work.
McCartney takes third place -- sweetheart songwriter and a personality made for fame, but no unique musical drive like john/george.
Ringo is ringo, and we love him.
>>73340860
He beat his wife
Paul said the Beatles were like a table with four legs- it takes all four legs for it to stand.
I'd put John third, behind Paul and George, but Paul was right: take away any one of them, and I think you've got a group that's good but not iconic.
>>73341010
Of course he did. Have you ever seen Cynthia? She's so weak she was probably crying going "ow John, don't hit me!!" and John was probably like "no bitch, I wrote Strawberry Fields, I can do what I want!!!"
>>73340965
This is an astute observation. I'd agree with it overall. Though I give McCartney more credit for his spear heading the band from 67-69.
This guy makes me sick and the beattles are overrated as fuck.
>>73340860
hey
did you know he beat his wife?
Better than Beatles
>>73343009
https://youtu.be/eVub73N5dcs
johnposting is what gives this board that "classic" feel
Oasis > Beatles
>>73343158
no one thinks that. especially not oasis themselves.
>>73340965
t. never listened to Ram
>>73343396
That's muzak to my ears
>>73340965
it disappoints me that this is true
seeing as John got all his direction from the current flavour of the month subcultures
>>73343158
Go to bed, Liam.
>>73343158
Fookin wot your a muppet were top band since but beatles are top jog on cunt as you were LG x
>>73341065
This gave me a boner.