So this is the stratocaster I'm thinking of picking up.

>>73237869
Did you make that thread earlier today?

>>73237869
Get yourself a VOX valvetronix breh

>>73237972
Yep

>>73237993
I thought you were gonna buy used? Anyways, that's a good guitar, but you can't really play Nirvana and Van Halen like you wanted to. At least it won't sound write.

>>73238043
I'll have to check out how it sounds in the shop. I could try a jazzcaster

>>73238043
I know Eddie Van Halen has the frankencaster but I don't have that money

>>73238069
You mean a jazzmaster? I think you might want something with humbuckers in the bridge section to play music with distortion. That's why I suggest a HSS Strat. But they also make a Jazzmaster with humbuckers.

Anyone have any recs for an acoustic guitar for someone just learning how to play?

>>73238132
Price range?

>>73238142
300-500

>>73237990
How are those? I'm looking for a tube/combo but the twin reverbs/deluxe reverbs are too expensive and way too loud

I'm interested in a real nice sounding clean channel

>>73238174
Used or new? Sorry forgot to ask

File: 427461-1.jpg (24KB, 699x242px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 699x242px

>>73238132
go to Guitar Center and go to the acoustic section

my favorite cheap one they have there is the black Fender

>>73237869
OP, just save up 600$ for a Made in Mexico Humbucker/Single/Single, if you get into playing alot you're going to be glad you got something semi-decent

>>73237869
>Buying guitars on the internet
Don't do this

>>73238244
this

>>73238244
I'm buying mine from a local guitar shop

>>73237869

this was actually my first electric guitar. it's pretty darn decent. i bought mine used for like 80 bucks

>squier

Save up a bit more and you can probably find a used SG Special Faded and not have to mess with the MIM garbage.

>>73238198
I like them, the cleans are nowhere as nice as a twin but still nice I would more recommend them for home players that want an amp with a little bit of everything.

I would look into smaller tube amps from the 70s from brands like Traynor and Musicman if you want something along the same lines as a deluxe/twin. Should be much cheaper

>>73239139
those still seem a little big, there's no point in getting a nice pure tube overdrive if I have to play at 639847492 dB to get it

>>73239187
Something like this is what I mean.

http://www.guitarcenter.com/Used/Traynor/Vintage-1970s-YGM-3-Tube-Guitar-Combo-Amp-113260358.gc

Overdrive isn't the only reason to get a tube amp, the cleans are much more articulate and punchy. If you really want something smaller, then the 40 watt vox could work for you. I have an orange crush that has a good clean channel also. Get something with at least a 10" speaker.

>>73239067
>implying squiers are bad
there are plenty of worse starter guitars he could buy

>>73239322
Oh alright that one is a pretty decent size

How would it–and the vox–stack up against a super champ or something? The clean channel is straight tube but it's still modeling

>>73237869
buy it used

If its your first guitar just get one of those squier/amp starter packages that are like 300 bucks.

>>73238174
Seagull S6. Don't fall for the fender meme.