1960's = Beatles 1970's = Bowie 1980's = Micheal

File: Obama-Feels-Good-man.jpg (48KB, 525x594px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 525x594px

>>73102643
>2000's = Kanye West
>2010's top contender is Kendrick

>have never heard anything by either of them

Bowie and Kanye don't really go with the rest and Beatles are like a combination of MJ and Nirvana but MJ and Nirvana themselves don't have much in common.

Mega-successful:
Bealtes, MJ

Frequently self-reinventing trend setters:
Bowie and Kanye (although Kanye's career only starts mid 2000s and straddles the 2010s as well

Voice of a commodified counterculture:
Beatles, Nirvana, you could make an argument for Bowie and Kanye but definitely not MJ.

I saw a youtube comment just like this under a tame impala video, and you make me cringe just as much op

1960's = The Velvet Underground
1970's = The Clash
1980's = Prince
1990's = Eric's Trip
2000's = Animal Collective
2010's = ????

Nah, when Kanye's new album drops, it will make Kendrick quit music. Just listen to those samples.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v37pyVcmKtM#t=1m19

Hnnnnnggg

>>73102894
>1990's = Eric's Trip
>2000's = Animal Collective

XD

>>73102950
I meant https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v37pyVcmKtM#t=1m19s

Specifically at 1 minute 19

>>73102894
pathetic.

>>73102643
the beatles are on a different plane than any of them unfortunatley, we might not see a band reach the same heights of significance for literally centuries, no matter how hard kanye tries to force the narrative that he's the modern beatles or mozart or what the fuck ever else his dumb ass is rambling about

>>73102643
Kendrick or Taylor Swift