Is this a joke review? It's not from April 1st and it's

It's pretty unique and an interesting listen

>>73075968
that is a great album

People like something I don't? How?!

>>73075968
>expecting quality from Pitchfork

it's contrarian garbage

>>73075968
It's just Farrah Abrahms, outsider shit

One of the greats. Captain Beefhart loved them.

>>73075968
it's actually quite a bit of fun

>>73075988
>>73075992
>>73077193
>>73077231
Yeah i like it too because it's so bad but giving it an 8.6 is fucking retarded

>>73077190
just like*

>>73077248
>trusting pitchfork
>trusting a review
>looking at the review
Here's your problem fucktard

>>73077162
>>73077286
I fucking hate pitchfork which is why i made this thread

>>73077302
Then stop complaining, never trust anyone s opinion or review on anything, especially from some pasty cali fucks

>>73077302
..then just don't read it. How is this even an issue?

>>73077193
What greats? They were incapable of playing their instruments. Every single one of them.
https://youtu.be/LoRE6TjfVBk

>>73077488
The fact that they were removed from any influence, they basically had to reinvent music because they couldn't listen to anything: the end result is one of the most primal and innocent recordings ever

>>73077707
Primal and innocent, sure. But great, just no.

>>73077479
anon, he's expressing disagreement.

>>73077707
They're literally playing generic pop rock poorly. The only thing they invented was their approach to lyrics.

Shaggs sounds like post punk and garage rock

It doesn't really sound "bad" to me (most of their songs at least)

I would give philosophy a 7 or a 7.5