hey /mu/ bros, /v/ here. tried to start a thread on /v/ but got told to go either here or /b/. since i know i dont like terrible or mainstream music, may as well come here! anyway, this is just a general beatles thread, or why modern music sucks so much. I also like queen.
i mean, the beatles changed EVERYTHING, yet modern artists didn't learn from them. There's really no modern music worth my time.
My favorite beatles album is sgt pepper, whats yours?
>queen
>>>/r/eddit
>>73049263
I hope this is bait
>>73049263
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
This bait is incredibly effective in the sense that it's so shit that it guarantees replies from people telling you how shit it is. Nice job anon.
>>73049263
>no modern music worth my time
>Says everything mainstream sucks
>Doesn't want to spend time searching music
>Choose one baka
>>73049263
stop listening to queen and check this out, it's a good starting point to music.
>>73049263
WEW LAD
E
W
L
A
D
>>73049411
Bait
>i also like queen
>>73049263
>Beatles thread
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
>>73049263
>/v/ here. tried to start a thread on /v/ but got told to go either here or /b/
if this is a serious thing why the fuck would you go to /v/ to start a beatles thread?