2017 mix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Remix is good but mono is still best

Yeah, Giles Martin did a great job.

>>72986660
Lovely Rita, Mr. Kite and A Day in the Life sound great. She's Leaving Home and When I'm Sixty-Four, not so much. Don't have a strong opinion on the others (except for Reprise, which has more energy now, but I preferred Love's version for the same reason).

Worst Beatles album.

>>72986992
Too bad that George Martin never did an arrengement for She's Leaving Home. I don't think he ever said how was his vision for it.

>>72987015
Not true by the way

>>72986660
2017 remix version of Pet Sounds when?

>>72987233
Last year

>>72987015

yeap, between the post-Rubber Soul albums.

>>72987237
Aw man, it sounds like shit. I'm just gonna stick with the 96 remaster.

>>72987247
No, Abbey Road and MMT are definitely worse.

>>72986660
Wait you're not meming? For the most part, the Beatles remasters have just been getting more and more brickwalled and distorted. I'm interested in hearing this

>>72987615
>Brickwalled
Nice meme term

>>72987615
It's not just a remaster, it's a remix. They finally got rid of that bullshit 60's stereo panning.

File: IMG_3694.png (894KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

894KB, 1136x640px

>>72986660

This means we will have a remix for the White Album next year, right?

>>72988255
Nah but Abbey Road in two maybe.

>>72986992
>I preferred Love's version
>Love
hang yourself anon :3

I've never enjoyed the beatles until I heard this 2017 mix

Anyone got the outtakes uploaded? Been trying to look for a while.

>>72987015
Not true, by the way

>>72987799
> actual technique used in mastering
> meme term
okay.............

File: blepe.jpg (62KB, 900x879px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 900x879px

>no Carnival of Light

>>72989580
Giles said it was considered but dropped because ultimately they only wanted to focus on material actually planned for the album.

The release is actually closer than you think

File: FB_IMG_1494510039674.jpg (21KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 640x480px

>>72987295
>Abbey Road

Is it a whole album or just a few songs?

>>72989963
Entire album plus brand new mix of Penny Lane

>>72989580
>>72989729
there's actually zero chance that Carnival Of Light lives up to the hype

>>72990010
All I care about is that it gets out.

Is it actually good?
I listened to the title track and With a little help from my friends but I'm waiting for the whole album to drop tomorrow.

>>72987982
>10 seconds into first track
>drums hard panned left
>guitar hard panned right

lol

>>72987267
Uhhh wasn't the Pet Sounds 50th anniversary literally just a repackaging of the Pet Sounds Sessions with a few live songs? Same mastering...

>>72990010
Hearing it is satisfaction enough

File: Captura de pantalla 2016-11-25 a las 08.42.30.png (88KB, 216x200px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 216x200px

>>72986660

>mfw i heard the new mix of LITSWD

listening to it now - it really is neat!!

Obviously the complete remix aspect means that it's the clearest you've ever heard this album. There's less of the fullness less warmth that the originals had, but that's to be expected with the added clarity. Guitars sound absolutely great, as do the drums! The vocal harmonies seem to stand out a little more, and the mixes are wide with a lot of breathing room. It sounds like something you might have gotten in the mid 70s - which I'm a fan of. Definitely freshens up an album that I've heard a thousand times (even if sgt pepper is not my favourite beatles album)

The Beatles - Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 50th Anniversary Stereo Mix (2017) [MP3: 320]
>mixed by giles martin (george martin's son) from original masters, sounds fantastic
sample: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RoA0QTZ-bM [Embed]
link: https://mega.nz/#!UpoHwbYb!Ii2WAjx-4TBQCr9OZhuXcXDGG6375Ei9l3p33QhPVOw

>>72986660
i was about to call you a pleb for liking an album remixed by someone unrelated to the artists who created it, but then I saw:
>>72986933
...seriously? hurr durr i don't like experiencing the full stereo experience an artist meticulously spent hours upon days crafting.
Sickening.

>>72988906
It's called limiting you dip

>>72986660
Giles Martin is more talented than George. I'm not even joking

>>72986933
up until this point I'd have agreed, but now we've got a true stereo mix where each instrument part is its own track. The issue with the other versions is that you had multiple parts on one track (because of the 4/8/12 track recording tech of the time). All stereo versions up till this point were an afterthought. This is the main attraction!

>>72991426
>that gud feelin you get when someone posts your link

Was anyone ever able to up the rest of the release (outtakes and etc)? I was only ever able to find the album itself.

>>72991482
You do realize that George Martin and the Beatles spent days fine tuning the mono mixes to be the perfect experience, right? The stereo mixes were just an afterthought...

File: 1453626268660.gif (13KB, 142x142px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 142x142px

>>72991482
are you saying that the original stereo is best?

>>72991841
>>72991935
see
>>72991581

>>72991426
you are doing God's work Anon

holy shit listening to this mix is like listening to the original album again for the first time

the original stereo mix sucks fucking dick and the mono is really good but its muddled and hard to make stuff out, this is literally perfect

>>72992722
the mono is only muddled if you arent paying attention desu

>>72992351
The guy in >>72991482 literally just posted gibberish and has no idea what the fuck he's talking about

File: autism-intensifies.jpg (43KB, 514x536px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 514x536px

>>72991572

This mix is amazing, really love it, it gives the album a new feeling, feels so different yet so familiar.

The new mix is alright. What I don't understand is why this stupid Giles asshole insists in putting the drums to the right on A Day in the Life? Is he stupid or something?

I just heard an interview of him in which he says something like "Ringo's drums on ADITL in mono are like an explosion, they power the whole song when they appear. That's lost in the stereo mix"

And then, this stupid asshole... what does he do? He puts the damn drums in the damn fucking right channel. Stupid fuck, jesus. Why? WHY?

>>72994594
So much hate with you, but I agree

so when is he gonna do the other albums

anyone have download link?

File: 262587405940.jpg (384KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1600x1066px

I still prefer the red wax mono but at least this version makes the stereo listenable

The crescendo in A Day in the Life is really amazing in this mix

>>72995036
definition of snob

>>72995195
kek i bet you haven't even heard it

Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds is fucking fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!, the previous stereo version was fucking shit

I don't know that much about the technicalities of music, but this shit sounds SO FUCKING GOOD.
Who knew that music could be experienced like this? Holy shit.

>>72994982
torrent? i cant find anything other than itunes atm

are these all the original tracks just remastered and remixed? because some of the songs sound noticeably different and i cant tell if its just the incredible clarity or if things are actually different

>Beetles remix album
>literally no drops

>>72995276
remaster = messing with the equalizer
remix = changing the actual arrangement of the instruments

>>72994982
>>72995267

see >>72991426

>>72995299
yeah i know. what im asking is did he use alternate takes/change the sounds in any way or just ultra-clarify them?

>>72995349
well it's called a remix so he messed around with he arrangements

he did have access to the original tapes

>>72987267
Get the MFSL stereo master, not that over-EQ'd Linett crapola

>>72995368
okay thanks.
a better and simplier question wouldve probably been to just ask if it was a remix or a remaster, but im dumb. thanks anyway

>>72995349
The old remasters were loyal to the first stereo mix (the shitty one), this one is loyal to the mono mix (the original one).

JOHN SAYS "I DONT BELIEVE IT" AT THE END OF LOVELY RITA. THE ENTIRE TIME I KNEW HE SAID SOMETHING BUT I COULD NEVER MAKE IT OUT WHAT THATS NUTS

>>72995478
I used to hear it as "better believe it". It's nice to hear exactly what he says.

Drums should ALWAYS be in the middle. Every song, every band, every genre.

It is for many of these songs but not all. My only gripe. Otherwise it's bloody brilliant and feels like hearing it for the first time again. The Beatles were pretty good weren't they?

>>72995597
>Drums should ALWAYS be in the middle. Every song, every band, every genre.

Deer god, this, so much. It should never, laterally NEVER, be panned on one side only.

File: deer god.png (217KB, 496x372px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 496x372px

>>72995658
>Deer god

strawberry fields forever is finally in the middle

fixing a hole sounds so good, holy shit

>>72995924
wait my copy doesn't have that, did they remix Strawberry Fields/Penny Lane too?

>>72995924
??? None of the links have those songs. Give them and no one gets hurt

The way the organ pans on Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds is really trippy.

File: 1472047880068.jpg (43KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x500px

>when within/without you kicks in

>>72996044
>>72996104
They're in the second disc (of the 2 disc edition).

>>72995290
lol

>>72996160
Based George raga mysticism out of nowhere

>>72995924
>>72996104
So I put off listening to SFF for whatever reason before now, I guess the amount of hype surrounding it kinda put me off. But I listened and I don't understand why everyone always goes on about it. This was the song that broke Brian Wilson? He wrote multiple albums worth of better songs.

File: image.jpg (30KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 225x225px

Is it better than the 1999 stereo remix featured here?

As a lot of other people have mentioned, panning the drums from ear to ear really annoys me.

God damn though, Lucy in the Sky sounds incredible.

>>72995597
> feels like hearing it for the first time again

This is exactly what i tought when i listened to ths remix, it changed a lot, it´s so amazing.

>>72996965
Right? I'm hearing all these sounds I either never heard before or am hearing much more clearly. I've had the thing on repeat since last night.

So what's everyone's favorite track from the album? I've always loved Mr. Kite. The way both parts of the song are so different yet blend together seamlessly.

>>72996764
at least listen to it more than once dumbass

>>72996764
Yes, that´s the song that fucked him, and no, i love Brian, but he didn´t write multiple albums worth of better songs, the production and execution of SFF it´s amazing.
The only song that Brian did that i think is equal production wise is Good Vibrations and talking of songwriting Surf´s Up

>>72996989
Lucy in the sky with diamons really blew my mind, it sounds so different and overwhelming.
I really enjoyed the whole album but probably it´s between Being for the benefit of mister kite or Lucy.
Maybe A Day in the Life.
I guess i can´t decide right now.

>>72995597
> The Beatles were pretty good weren't they

that's actually funny, I had that same thought. I mean I'm a big Beatles fan, but when I listened to the instrumentals I was like "wow these guys are doing some really neat stuff that I never noticed"

>>72997180
People don´t seem to realize that they were excelent musicians and performers, i also noticed pretty cool stuff going around in the intrumentals.

Anyone else get sort of depressed listening to the Beatles ? Like, knowing I could spent 10 years on a single song and it still wouldn't be half as good as something they churned out in a day.

Got a huge smile on my face listening to Getting Better. It sounds so fucking good you guys

>>72986660

It's not enough of a remix

Why do I still have McCartney's fucking bass panned to the right in Day in the Life? And then the drums are panned right too. It's garbage. I was really hoping this mix would make it sound competent.

Not to mention Sgt Peppers isn't even a top 5 Beatles album.

>>72986660
>>72991426
>>72995924
>>72996187

Anybody got a link to the full 6-disc set?

Or at least the lowly 2-disc?

>>72997493
Technically 4 disc, the last two are a documentary. But yes, I'm also looking for the other discs as well

>only putting two discs on streaming

What the fuck I hate the Beatles

wtf I love lucy in the sky with diamonds now

>>72997528
I'm just wondering who the absolute hero of a madman will be to offer up the 4-disc-er to us...they'll become legendary, damn

>>72997667
Yeah as a fucking 3rd world poor fuck I'm waiting for that too. Also would be neat if someone uploaded all of the Super Deluxe Edition.

>>72986660
Listening to She's Leaving Home right now. It's completely different from any recent version I've heard, like its' pitched higher or they used a different take.

>>72997735

There was a difference between the mono and stereo versions back in the old mixes.

It's truly a psychedelic masterpiece now

>>72997793

It's a bunch of boring old granny songs.

The only good songs are Day In The Life and the title tracks. Maybe Friends if you wanna be generous.

Magical Mystery Tour is the album Sgt Peppers should have been.

>>72997825
get over yourself

File: cat tipper.gif (2MB, 335x258px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 335x258px

>>72997825

>>72997856

Great discussion on /mu/ - Music

>>72997825
would you be saying that if MMT didn't include the singles?

>listening to remasters

good god, so many fucking plebs in this thread

>>72997981
So you've never listened to Sgt Pepper on anything other than vinyl?

>>72989580
>>72989729
>>72990010
>>72990025
Is that song going to be remastered and released or something ? What about the versions on YouTube ?

What's the story with that track ?

>>72997981
It's not a remaster you fucking idiot it's a reMIX

>>72998000
only mono vinyl.. but desu im listening to these remixes right now and they're pretty awesome.. so different. I change my mind. Still doesn't feel right not listening to the original though.

>>72998052
good god this is amazing

>>72986660

>autistic dolbe 5.1 surround sound tricks
>wow each channel has its own speaker
>so immersive
>99% of you listen to it on headphones which can replicate multi directional sounds

its just bullshit

Sgt. Pepper is AOTY 2017

>>72998197
How high are you?

>>72997423
read a interview with Giles, he said on some tracks they tried to put drums/bass in the middle, but it affected the feel of the song, for example the sound of Ringo's voice in With A Little Help From My Friends.
Maybe it was the same on A Day In The Life?

here you go: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/the-beatles-sgt-peppers-50th-anniversary-giles-martin-interview-abbey-road-studios-a7755141.html

>>72998298

wow the voice is coming from my right speaker

so imersive

>literally every hendrix album did this nativly when it came out

>the entire first Guns album did this for Izzy and Slash's riffs

i really enjoy it more now

>>72998637
you what mate?
did you take Lucy Sky Diamond?

>>72986660
why does listening to the beatles in the studio give me such a large erection

>I used to be cruel to my woman and I beat her
Wtf I love getting better now

>>72986660
Mono is still better

>>72994833
>listening to Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite
Holy shit. aural ecstasy

has anyone got disc 2? please

File: 1466457980404.jpg (27KB, 489x499px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 489x499px

>>72999945
Spotify

>>72998637
You're an actual retard.

>mfw no flac
kill me lads

File: 29634D9D-194E-49C5-95AB-462682663457-1750-000000FE78E44385.jpg (88KB, 340x480px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 340x480px

>>72998203

File: pbr.jpg (50KB, 600x339px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x339px

Can someone explain to me what this is all about?

I get that the quality is probably much better but how can it be superior if it's not what the artists intended? Is there some reason that the Beatles couldn't make the album they wanted to and this remix captures something that they couldn't before? Otherwise I'm not sure how you justify a non-bandmember "fixing" an album decades later...

Strawberry fields forever - Take 26
is fucking trash

>>73000512
until 67/68 the Beatles didn't care about Stereo mixes, Mono mixes were more important. they would spend days mixing Mono and a few hours mixing Stereo.

>>73000557

So this is just a high quality stereo mix of an album that the artists didn't really to be in stereo?

>>73000533
Pretty sure that was one of the two takes to make the master track you shitter.

>>73000575
Well, yes and no. They decided to focus on working within the aural confines of Mono because that's what most people had then.

However, both Ringo *and* Paul have said that the new remaster is "closer to their original vision" than what they made back then.

So it's just cool to have the OG historic Mono as well as the fancy polished new version to hear a bit more sparkle in places where you couldn't previously.

The remaster is fair play, but we fans are constantly craving those alternate takes & scraps of studio chatter -- *that* is what sells us

File: 1495421419807.png (230KB, 338x338px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 338x338px

>LITSWD

>>73000533
You dumb nigger, they used half of that take and half of the other one included to make the final version.

>>72986660
>>72991426
Holy Shit, this is really good

File: 1471482689231.jpg (10KB, 395x200px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 395x200px

why aren't there mixes like this one for every album already??

George Martin's dead folks. Remember that.

>>72991426
isn't it a transcode though?

>>72991482
The Beatles spent like 700 hours on the mono and 7 on the stereo

just found disc 2 of the deluxe on soulseek, idk about super deluxe tho

>>73001340
Mind tossing up a MEGA, senpai?

>>73001385
dude's upload is slow af so it's gonna take a while. if nobody's got a link in like an hour i'll put it up

>>72996764
SFF is my favorite Beatles song just in terms of technical feats. Its a great song that was put together using pretty clever techniques. Although I'm a bit of a snob and prefer the second half (take 26 mix in) sped up to its original speed. For me it gives the rest of the song more power

REVOLVER 2017 mix when??

CD 2 and 3 Outtakes/Demos are on soulseek by some kind soul

>>73001499
please, i want to hear I'm Only Sleeping in stereo but with the mono mix version (like when that one reverse guitar sound comes on, first time i heard the album in mono, i nutted that moment)

>>72998603
Good interview. There's an interesting quote:

>I suddenly went, "Oh, this is why it's a great album.' Because you have 'Within You Without You' going into 'When I'm Sixty-Four' and it becomes this body of work where each song completes the next song. It's an escape - just when you think things are getting a bit heavy... It's a bit like The Beatles at this stage [of their career] - the sum of the parts was much greater than individualities. It's the ultimate Beatles collaboration album where they were all on the same page. I think when listening to the songs individually, they aren't as good than when you listen to them on Sgt. Pepper's. Everything matches.

I'm really amazed how clueless anons ITT are holy shit

>>72998012
It was never released and never leaked in any capacity.

Any version you will find online is either a complete fabrication or a (partially) educated approximation based on what little information is out there.

We don't know what form it'll take when it does get out. Giles keeps saying he hopes "we do something cool" with it, which could mean anything.

>>73001564
its annoying that theres literally 3 mixes of that song with reverse guitar in different points each time. i agree with you, the mono placements are the superior versions

The backwards guitar effect is heard in different places in the four mixes, and a lead guitar track is mixed differently throughout the solo and at the end. An alleged fifth mix, the "French EP", is just [d].

verse 1:
no backwards guitar (BG) on any mix
verse 2:
[a] no BG
[b] BG on "everywhere at such a speed" and "find there's no need"
[c] BG on "running everywhere at such a speed" and "till they find there's no need"
[d] BG on "where at such a speed" and "there's no need"
verse 3:
[a] BG on "time" and "ceiling"
[b][c] no BG
[d] BG on "staring at the ceiling"
solo:
[a] guitar continues into words "please don't" at end of solo
[b][d] guitar ends at end of solo
[c] guitar fades in 2 bars later, continues into "please"
verse 4:
no BG on any mix
end:
[a] guitar starts 4 beats after the last word "sleeping"
[b][c][d] guitar starts immediately after last word "sleeping"

>>73001640
Giles, to clarify, is Giles Martin, the son of producer George Martin. Giles has been at the forefront of all the latest reissues and digital reworkings of Beatles tracks, including the Love album and everything beyond that.

>>72991426
You're a true friend anon

>>72986933
You are a fucking retard

>>72994594
He most likely tried center and it just didn't work. Or he's a retard.

Fuck, I'm really surprised with Within You Without You. It just got better. And for some reason the transition to When I'm 64 makes more sense now.

>>73001557
what'd you look up?

File: 1351997417763.gif (1MB, 311x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 311x240px

I bet some /mu/ posters are so far up into their own asses that they'll say the mono version is still superior.

>>73001865
for some reason, typing in "beatles" is blocked? so just type in the rest of the the title

"hearts club 2017" and you should get some good results

someone needs to upload this shit to mega immediately because like 500 fucking people are trying to download this at the same time on soulseek

The bass sounds so good

>>73001499
RUBBER SOUL 2017 mix pls

The 1999 remixed Rubber Soul tracks really are gorgeous, if they extended those to the entire album...

Every Beatles album deserves this treatment, I'm almost crying.

The Penny Lane remix sounds the same desu

>they FINALLY get that transition in Day in the Life right

on every mix when the first orchestra crescendo segues into the paul segment, it always got clipped. The only time I heard it done right was the music video for day in the life, where the fade off of the orchestra finishes as paul's bass crossfades over it. Really excited for this.

One more thing, I found on the vinyl versions of ADITL the crescendos both the first and finale are MUCH more intense. I listened to the 1967-1970 album (blue album) version of this song and I was blown away by it, but listening to all the remasters, they normalized it so its less jarring. Sad

>>73001499
51st anniversary pro ably isn't gonna happen boys.
That said I heard they're doing something similar with the white album remixing with some of the songs with a large amount of takes
I think this would be the best time to release carnival of lights as well since it was recorded around this album

holy shit Lucy in the sky

fuck

>>73001996
This. Giles better be working on the rest

jesus christ it's day like this that I hate being deaf from one ear reeeeeeeeeee

>>73002096
id kill myself desu

File: The_Beatles_1_album_cover.jpg (44KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 300x300px

You are forgetting that this album received the same Giles Martin treatment in 2015. Whats your opinion?

>>73002130
The transition from mono to stereo after the first few songs is a little jarring. Otherwise no complaints, though I didn't know many of the older mixes particularly well anyway.

>>73002130
the best thing to come of that was the 1080p versions of the beatles music videos. SFF had a fucking amazing video.

File: 00011.m2ts_snapshot_02.46_[2015.11.17_23.30.11].jpg (249KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1920x1080px

>>73002150

File: 7BcUC7ds.jpg (95KB, 1024x524px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1024x524px

>>72986660
it sounds so good

>>73002130
good shit

>>73002130
Paperback Writer is amazing

You people are fucking idiots holy shit. This mix is trash, literally and unequivocal trash.

It doesn't sound "so clear". What does that even mean? The fidelity of Beatles recordings have always been absolutely top notch. They used the best and most expensive equipment. This mix doesn't sound "clearer" than any of the other versions, that doesn't even make any sense.

All he did was go in and play around with the panning on the tracks. Drums go here, bass goes here, guitar goes here and then I'll move them around a bit. It's literally pointless and against the artist's wishes and intention. Not to mention this hack had the option to choose between the stereo and mono tracks (which are different at different times), meaning he created some sort of Frankenstein album that is potentially filled with sounds that The Beatles had NO intention of including. It's dumb.

Seriously, get some fucking ears. It's insane how impressed you guys are by some hack slapping a new hat on a perfectly mixed album. The mono mix is not only perfectly fine, but much better than what you're hearing here. Just stop. Please.

>>73002320
it's better

>>73002320
>>All he did was go in and play around with the panning on the tracks. Drums go here, bass goes here, guitar goes here and then I'll move them around a bit. It's literally pointless and against the artist's wishes and intention. Not to mention this hack had the option to choose between the stereo and mono tracks (which are different at different times), meaning he created some sort of Frankenstein album that is potentially filled with sounds that The Beatles had NO intention of including. It's dumb.

At first I was mad but I know you simply have no clue what you're talking about so I'm okay

>>73002320
What did he mean by this?

>>73002320
It's "clearer" because for this remix they've used the pre-bounced tapes. The original mix was made on 4 track, so reductions and bounces had to be made to put everything in there. For this mix they had access to those original tapes, so it's better, for that only.

Now, for the placement... yeah, some things are not quite right yet, like those damn drums still not in the middle for all songs. I also think Giles could have gone a bit more wild in this. He's so "clean" at putting things in one place and leave them there. The original stereo mix had so much crazy pannings (ie: ADITL vocals jump from right to left and right again in the verses). It's a fucking psychedelic album after all, for chrissake.

File: 00011.m2ts_snapshot_02.53_[2015.11.17_23.30.38].jpg (286KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1920x1080px

>>73002320
Are you feeling okay?

>>73002320
I think most people are just comparing the stereo versions. The mono version is of course what they intended.

>>73002369
>It's a fucking psychedelic album after all, for chrissake.
The mono versions sounds infinitely more psychedelic than this or any other stereo version. John's vocals on Lucy are the perfect example.

Panning instruments is babby's first psych trick. It's dumb.

The unison glissando at the end of Day in the Life seems messier than the 2009 mix. Otherwise massive improvement

who wants to drop acid with me

>>73002432
I don't know what that means

literally The Beatles Bass-Boosted Youtube video: the remaster

>>73002552
you're just bad because you can't afford the new cd

>>73001340
The user 'For No One' has the entire thing up in FLAC on his Soulseek account.

>>73002320
someone doesn't understand how mixing down on a 4 track works lol

File: 91D5B7F9-E2C5-4EB4-A893-83B244B5BA8B-2779-000001BF5DFCED9E.jpg (10KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 443x332px

>>73002320
"What a nice fella"

>>73002320
t.numale

Did they speed up Getting Better?

>>73002537
The instruments are harder to hear and it's more a wash of noise.

>>73002884
I find it to be the opposite actually... I can hear different instruments more clearly than I have ever been able to.
Especially the horns.

>>73002130
paperback writer on that is the best stereo mix for any beatles song

Reminder that "Within You Without You", "Good Morning, Good Morning", and "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)" stop it from being a 10/10.

>>73003337
the reprise shits on the original

>>73002863
*very* and I mean VERY slightly

it's one second shorter

biggest change is that now the staccato guitar is louder than the staccato piano

also, as on every track, the bass is louder

>>73003640
I clearly noticed two guitars playing on it this time, on the mono mix I can barely tell the difference

There really needs to be more silence between tracks.

>>73003640
Yeah the bass is turned up to 11 on all tracks. It's an easy way to "modernize" music and it definitely makes the tracks sound different. It does remind you just how great and unique of a bass player Paul is though. His lines are just as poppy as the main melody.

I doubt the bass was supposed to be mixed this high though and though there's definitely some more clarity here (though some of that may be due to the fact that I never listen to these songs in stereo) with the new mix, I'm still perferring the mono mix overall and this new mix is just something new and alternative to listen to.

>>73003337
Pleb opinion. WYWY is one of the best tracks on the record and the Repise is better than the original in every single aspect.

>>73003337
what kind of person doesn't like Within You Without You

>>73003824
Oh my god, the transition between Within You and When I'm 64 is awfully hilarious.

>tiny brain: THE FACT THAT
>normal brain: The Beatles are the greatest band ever!
>brain with lasers: actually the Beach Boys are better
>brain in space: actually the best is super deluxe bass-boosted Beatles
>interdimensional multibrain: you're all wrong the best is youtube dubstep remixes of the Kinks

>>73004055
>youtube dubstep remixes of the Kinks
any recs?

>>73003337
>being this much of a pleb

File: lennon piano pepper.jpg (59KB, 302x302px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 302x302px

>tfw every song but one is about LSD

>>73004181
"When I'm Sixty-Four" is about an especially wild acid trip.

>>73004206
>Paul did acid when he was twelve
absolute madman

>>73004206
>>73004219
>>73004181

kek

File: 720x405-72092300.jpg (52KB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 720x405px

>>73004206
>writes a song about how in old age he'll probably be working on the garden and enjoying a little wine on his birthday
>spends old age clubbing with rappers

the maddest man

>>73004299
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAY8QYYnCXE
hiding these moves is a crime.

File: 1486767592346.jpg (43KB, 396x388px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 396x388px

i hope they do it for MMT
>muh Blue Jay Way

>>73004535
which version do you like better? the mono version with no backwards "ahhhhAHHs" mixed in or the stereo version which adds them in between lines for some psychadelic texture?

God damn this mix really is wonderful. It really does feel like the first time again.

>>73004697
the stereo version. it's the one I first heard and the mono sounds naked in comparaison. the backward vocals work perfectly with the drums, which ringo killed.

anyone got a mega for the second disc? every slsk link is queued

>>73004796
nigga its on spotify

>>73004807

not pt 2

File: shower feels.jpg (38KB, 527x612px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 527x612px

Fuck man. I haven't heard this album in years. I forgot how beautiful it is.

>>73004835
it is tho what u talking about

>>73004864

Im looking at it right now

theres "deluxe edition" and remastered without strawberry fields/penny lanes

File: deluxe.png (75KB, 1175x824px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1175x824px

>>73004887
it's only missing the other discs, but it's there

>>73004887
arrr

>>73002571
CanNOT find this dude for the life of me :(

Lovely Rita is going back to the top of the charts

Hey guys can I get help, wtf is the practice routine.

>>73000840
No fucking clue man. It would be like printing money. I NEED a Revolver remix.

>>72987233
>somebody mentions Sgt. Pepper's/The Beatles
>HUURRRRR PET SOUNDS

every.single.time.

>>73002320
I give literally not a single fuck about what they intended. It's how it actually sounds that matters.

What song was the most interesting for you? Good Morning Good Morning was the high point for me.

>>73006155
lovely rita sounded the most different to me

I think this is actually my favorite album ever again. I've come full circle.

SOMEONE PLEASE UPLOAD THE OTHER DISCS TO MEGA

Disc 2 here

http://www21.zippyshare.com/v/609mT8l9/file.html

>>72988255
this needs to happen

File: K3D4A1X8.jpg (98KB, 963x595px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 963x595px

>>73004984

File: 1486352160902.jpg (102KB, 750x938px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 750x938px

>>73006798
THANK YOU
Here's some tits

Are you guys adding Strawberry Fields/Penny Lane onto the tracklisting, and if so, where?

File: sgtp.jpg (75KB, 1299x322px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1299x322px

>>73007147
The tracklist is perfect already, just keep it on disk 2

LOVELY RITA, METER MAID

also link pls
is it on slsk?

>>72986933
This is an indisputable fact

>>73007233
Yeah I'm not adding them because then I would have to remove them from MMT and that isn't right. They've always been on MMT so that's where they'll stay.

>>72986954
This poster knows what's up.
Now I haven't heard the 50th anniversary version but until I do I still maintain that the mono mix is better than the stereo version. One only needs to compare both versions of Getting Better and Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds for proof. (Go ahead. Listen to both versions back to back. I'll wait. I'll be here)

>>72997354
You must be pol

>>73006289
I feel the same way.

its kind of amazing what a new mix can do to a song

i used to dislike Within You, Without You, but now I recognize it as the supreme victor of this album, even better than A Day In The Life

hissing sound near the end of Lovely Rita, never noticed that before

>>73008745
George raga mysticism is the final Beatle-pill

>>73008850
what about PEACE & LUV

File: Sgt_peppers_lonely_hearts_club_band_poster.jpg (32KB, 300x461px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x461px

the one true sgt pepper

The sound is ... okay, if you're listening to it on a cell phone. But it continues the same pattern that the Beatles masters have had of very bass-heavy masterings with the treble rolled off. Please compare it to the MFSL remaster, which has always been my definitive stereo version (and remember, it plays much quieter):

https://mega.nz/#F!GUYBjARa!8WsXcTRqTvthx6fadGjKNg

File: download.jpg (12KB, 191x263px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 191x263px

>>73009163
Krishna is love

>>73009194
title track panning on the vocals and guitar is so hard, I just can't deal with it anymore