>newbie asking for recommendations on /lit/ >start with

history is objective

music is subjective

>>72976892
if you love /lit/ so much why don't you marry it?

>>72976904
>history is objective

>>72976892
Sorry faggot usually people who want music spoonfed to them without any specifications on what they want cant handle anything but pop

>>72976904
>history is objective
>>72976892
it's because when people ask for recommendations on /mu/, they normally mean 20th-21st century pop music. also /lit/ is a shit.

>>72976892
ok
>Mozart
>Beethoven
>Bach
>Chopin
>Haydn
>Tchaikovsky
there's your list go listen to everything they've ever made then you're /lit/

>>72976922
>>72976960
it is though

just because someone may have recorded it wrong doesn't change the actual things that took place

see: the ""holocaust""

>>72976989
>not listening to pre-baroque music
pleeeebbbbbb

File: computing.....png (155KB, 406x301px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 406x301px

so in other words

>newbie asks for recs on /lit/
>gets rec'd obvious choices
>/lit/ are /lit/erally zombies with inability to choose for themselves

>newbie asks for recs on /mu/
>gets rec'd an assortment of albums that other anons like

hmmmm

>>72976996
>he thinks the holohoax is real

>>72976996
but that's not history though, that's just a sequence of events

>>72976996
that's what it means by "history". the recorded version of events.

File: 1484889292500.jpg (28KB, 264x292px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 264x292px

>first recorded piece of literature "Epic of Gilgamesh" made 2100 BC
>first recorded song "Au Clair De La Lune" made in 1860
I wonder why these aren't comparable mediums...

>>72977025
nice reading comprehension

>>72977009
literally almost all garbage, only worth a listen for context of what comes after

>>72976892
>newbie asks for recs on /lit/
>they give the most lazy-ass recommendations known to man
"dude you should totally read Catcher in the Rye lmao it's amazing tho"

>>72976996
Just because someone feels another way about a piece of music it doesn't change the actual rhythmic meter or notes.

Also, we're talking about literature, an art form and not history in the broad sense.

File: image.jpg (41KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x450px

>>72976904
>'history is objective'

music continues to evolve and get better over time

literature peaked almost a century ago and everything of real consequence or influence has already been written

you're in a golden age of music, you're after the golden age of literature

>>72977239
>music continues to evolve and get better over time
pop music maybe. but music in general peaked over a hundred years ago. even jazz peaked 40 years ago.

>>72977239
>making huge historical claims on the merit of an entire art form

Wew, late-teen hipster internet ph.d

>>72976892
>objective cornerstone of western lit
You need to get away from /lit/ occasionally.

>>72977045
Dunno dude but 'Cherry Pie' by Warrant made a bigger impact on society than Sinclair's 'The Jungle

>>72977470
yeah, today's society

>>72976892
Not comparable art forms, it would be like telling someone trying to get into film to watch classical plays.
Art Music, Popular Music, and Traditional Folk Music are all worlds different.

>>72976892
Literature uses allusion more heavily than music

>>72977047
go back to /lit/

>>72977119
>ITAOTS

>>72976892
carles, it's over, I'm sorry

>>72977809
no u

>>72977825
People aren't required to listen to ITAOTS for a high school assignment, thus ITAOTS is an OK intro to 'weird' music due to the fact that most normies haven't heard it.

>>72977021

It's actually more like

>/lit/
>get recommended a bunch of pleb tier garbage that is probably from the same group of 50 things that board reads


>/mu/
>get recommended a bunch of pleb tier garbage that is probably from the same group of 50 things that board listens to

every community devolves into the same bullshit