>There are people on this board who think Revolver is

File: Beatin' Time.png (257KB, 444x733px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 444x733px

>tfw there are people on this board who dislike the Beatles

>>72945440
Got any more of these?

File: 3446567645.jpg (72KB, 500x511px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 500x511px

>mfw I think Revolver is better than Sgt.Pepper and no faggot on an amine image board can stop me

File: IMG_1152.jpg (31KB, 351x355px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 351x355px

>>72945372
Hello

File: IMG_1150.jpg (23KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 225x225px

>>72945372
It's

File: IMG_1151.jpg (27KB, 227x222px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 227x222px

>>72945372
Mayne

>>72945360
It is.

>>72945450
No, but I might make some

I only like the mono version of Sgt Pepper.

Revolver is better because I can listen to both the mono and stereo version.

>>72945440
kys
I mean it
The Beatles were a shit band on the same level as the fucking Monkees, except worse because they literally have a fucking pun name

Sgt. Pepper isn't even the best album they released that year. Literally kys faggot.

>>72945360
>there are people on this board who actually pretend to like the beatles just because their favourite faggot hipster SWPL liberal music critics claim they're "the greatest rock band ever"
i bet you faggots turn around and call zeppelin/CCR dadrock too

the beatles were trash and were generally an uninnovative pop group

>>72947376
How can you stomach the stereo version of Elenor Rigby
it's so bad

File: IMG_0356.jpg (63KB, 604x608px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 604x608px

>>72947848
>calls the Beatles out for being unoriginal
>praises Led Zeppelin (unoriginal)
You have interesting technique

>>72947894
where did I praise Zeppelin or call them original? Please, point it out

File: 1492453632936.jpg (13KB, 268x320px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 268x320px

>>72945360
There are people on this board who think that The Beatles are even remotely worth discussing in 2017

File: Piero_Scaruffi_2.jpg (7KB, 209x204px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 209x204px

>>72947934
THE FACT THAT

>>72947927
You called the Beatles uninnovative and say "I bet you hate Led Zeppelin too"
Implying you think Led Zeppelin is better than the Beatles when Led stole all the time and were not innovative
Therefore they are no better than the Beatles but you hold them to a higher standard

>>72947934
fuck off fag

>>72947987
I didn't say that

>you think Led Zeppelin is better than the Beatles

Where did I say this? I simply said you pointed out that you probably call Zeppelin 'dadrock' while pretending The Beatles weren't a boring pop group.

>>72947982
This guy I swear. How can anyone take him seriously. While I do agree with him that the Beatles is a highly overrated band, I don't consider him to be the "quintessential" music critic, let alone a intellect of the other topics he discusses on his page. He knows a lot of different subjects but he is the master of none, Music included.

>>72948019
dense retard

>>72948039
How am I a dense retard because you read things into my post that aren't there?

File: Shut Up.png (637KB, 500x706px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 500x706px

>>72947386
>tfw he doesn't like the monkees either

>>72948032
Have you actually read Piero's writing on The Beatles? You probably haven't, instead just assuming it's bullshit because a non-mainstream opinion of your oh so precious 'Fab Four' couldn't POSSIBLY be worthy of merit. If you had any critical faculties rattling around in your empty skulls at all you would have realised independently long ago that the Beatles really were nothing more than a glorified pop group with some '''''''''innovative''''''''''' wrapping on the later albums to make them seem interesting.

>>72948781
Hi Piero
Who's translating your posts for you?

>>72947376
What the fuck? Sgt. Pepper's is literally one of the few good stereo Beatles albums. Revolver is fucking unlistenable. Right from the start Taxman already has that stupid ass drums on the left guitars on the right bullshit that drives me mad. Atleast the Sgt. Pepper's version gives some new colors to the sound (even then mono is still superior)

File: B34F2C8A-7629-421D-89C8-2789FF8EB7E9-463-0000008316400882.jpg (82KB, 584x389px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 584x389px

>>72948019
"Dadrock" is a derogatory term
Derogatory terms are used to describe things you think are bad
If you implied others see something I'm a derogatory way then you implied they do not like it

>>72948781
Excuse me? Did you read my post? I said that I did agree with him about his thoughts on The Beatles. What I said that he has no position to rate music as if he was some sort of music g*d. Get a clue.

File: shitsonfirejohn.jpg (107KB, 564x544px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 564x544px

>>72945450
It isn't exactly the same kind of pic, but I made this last year.

File: Beach-Boys.jpg (55KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 630x420px

>There's people on this board who think The Beatles made a better album than Pet Sounds

Abbey Road>Sgt.>White Album>Revolver>Let it Be>Rubber Soul.

>>72949068
>I idolize a literal potato

>>72947386
Fuck Piero Scaruffi

>>72949099
s/t>MMT>Revolver>Rubber Soul>Abby Road>Sgt.>Let it Be

white album or get the fuck out

>>72949978
Fuck Piero Scaruffi? One day soothe music criticism community will have a mass epiphany regarding this insipid boy band and traditionalist ostriches like you will be left in the past clutching desperately to your copies of Please Please Me, but it won't matter how much you cry, because those of us that are able to truly appreciate the beauty that musicians can create will have moved on to greater things. Face it, you like the Beatles not because they made worthwhile art, but simply because of the name. "Oh, The Beatles, The Beatles!' You fawn over a quartet of talentless scousers because you've been brainwashed to love them the same way you no doubt love Coca-Cola and MacDonald's. This is supposed to be a music discussion board, and yet hear you are, blindly defending your Sacred Capitalistic Cows. You don't really care about music, you're too stupid to care about anything. Fuck The Beatles, my friend, fuck the Beatles

File: USS4XeT.jpg (40KB, 485x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 485x720px

>>72950002
holy fucking shit dude

File: Screenshot_2017-05-22-19-28-27.png (456KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1440x2560px

>>72947386

File: Screenshot_2017-05-22-19-28-33.png (469KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1440x2560px

>>72950077

>its a /mu/ pretends Abbey Road is the magnum opus of The Beatles just because its widely regarded as such thread

>>72950002
lol

I unironically think that Led Zeppelin is better than the Beatles, though I like both bands. Come at me.

>>72949986
Why do people love s/t so much? It doesnt flow (both cds open and close really well) it has bad songs (bungalow bill, why dont we do it in the road,etc) and its hard to listen to the whole thing.
You put MMT 2nd and its like sgt. Pt 2 (and i love it) but leaves sgt. At the end

File: 1359872879916.png (43KB, 555x624px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 555x624px

I like the beatles, the white album and magical mystery tour have some real groovy songs my dude

>>72945360
>there are Rolling Stone shills on this board who think Sgt. Pepper is better than Revolver
Don't get me wrong, it's a good record, but it's got some really big mistakes:
>She's Leaving Home
>Within You Without You
are both incredibly mediocre tracks, and barring Day in the Life, make for the longest two tracks on the record. Even worse they left off Strawberry Fields Forever because muh singles.
Honestly if they erased both of those tracks and replaced them with SFF I'd agree that it's their best record, but as it stands right now it's a lot of interesting pop songwriting meshed with a lot of useless, uninteresting space.
Also, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds is drugslmaoXD, even if its an ok track.

Revolver on the other hand is perfect. The only bad thing about it is Elanor Rigby for being so overplayed and for producing dozens of copycat songs (pop songs driven entirely by orchestra strings) that were not as good. In this regard too Revolver was the more experimental record of the two- it took more risks, it employed more technologies and textures than its successor, and in general more of those risks paid off.

>>72948850
>Right from the start Taxman already has that stupid ass drums on the left guitars on the right bullshit that drives me mad.
That's like one of the coolest parts of the stereo version though.
Are you autistic?

>>72951050
>She's Leaving Home
>Within You Without You
>mediocre
how do you have such shit taste
literally two of the best Beatles songs

>le beatles

Overrated, plastic,and very mediocre at best.

Literally just had a few good tunes, and that's it.

>>>/plebbit/

>>72951219
>how do you have such shit taste
^

>>72945360
Damn
it's almost like music is subjective

File: The Beatles - 1.jpg (19KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 600x600px

>implying there is any need to listen to a specific Beatles album if you own the Singles Collection
you guys are just wasting your time

File: 18157550_1120177594794709_1309555661252175224_n.jpg (52KB, 640x465px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x465px

>>72949994
>Number nine
Number nine
>Number nine
Number nine
>Number nine
Number nine
>Number nine
Number nine
>Number nine
Number nine
>Number nine
Number nine
>Number nine
Number nine

>>72945360
Revolver is objectively the best Beatles album

>>72945360
John Lennon is one of the people who thinks Revolver is better than Sgt. Pepper's.

Don't get me wrong, Paul is my favorite Beatle, but the Beatles work best as a collaboration and not as "Paul's Whimsy Mimsy Tin Pan Alley Tribute Band."

Revolver is the perfect blend of pop and experimentation, and it was the last album the Beatles released before they devolved into Paul's silly all-star solo project.

I want to reiterate again, however: Paul is still the best Beatle.

>tfw you will never be a hip, mod teenager in London in 1966 hurrying to the corner record shop to grab a copy of Revolver before you go toke it up in a park

File: beatlesbingo.jpg (35KB, 441x502px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 441x502px

Great band with such creative lyrics, guitars and haircuts!

>>72945360
I think Sgt Peppers is better, just for the production. But both are fine opinions.

It's okay to be a Beatles-hater, but if you're going to present yourself as a contemporary music aficionado, then you have an obligation to at least *try* to like them. If you listen to Rubber Soul, Revolver, Magical Mystery Tour, and Sgt. Pepper's the whole way through with an open mind and still hate the Beatles, then fine. But you have an obligation to try.

white album best album