What the shit, man? This has to be the most unfortunate music/cover art quality ratio ever. I've missed out on this PERFECT record year after year, just because of its ugly sleeve. It's not fair.
Not even a bad cover
band name is worse than cover
>>72826256
what he said, I actually think the cover looks good. BUT it certainly does not represent the music AT ALL. I went around not listening to this like you OP, but it was simply because I thought it was some r&b bullshit with that cover, but I never thought it looked bad, I just assumed the music in it was not for me
>>72826192
That's a great cover, though. Especially for the 80s.
Band is tight
>>72827276
this
agree that it's a great album though, easily a 10/10 for me
>>72826256
The cover could be fixed with a little bit of tweaks. Add some contrast. Make some of the borders a little bolder. Get rid of the clashing background and boom it would be a-ok
>>72826192
ANDY DOG
>>72826306
You deserve to have missed out on this by the sounds of it
>>72826192
>>72826306
They have a better newer one, but yeal Soul Mining has some solid tracks