What are you spinning tonight /mu/? Pic related. I finally

File: xj9hmm.png (55KB, 387x524px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 387x524px

>not putting the dust cover down

>>72727530
Just tryna show off my near mint PL-518 DUH

>>72727530
Audiophiles actually insist the sound quality is better with it off (something about the acoustics of playback) to the point where many very high end turntables either don't have one or have one that lifts off entirely rather than being on hinges.

File: IMG_4073.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

NEED SOME HELP
I bought this today (2x10 in capitol sleeve with parlophone records). I looked on Discogs but found all the run outs matching mine have text on the covers. As you can see, my copy has NO text on it. Thoughts?

>>72727973
Not unusual actually. Sleeves might change, but most of the time they just reuse the vinyl records for new batches. This is why, for example, some Parlophone sleeves have Capitol logos on the labels.

spinning in my computer chair, waiting for the weekend haha (just having some fun)

File: IMG_2353.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

OP again, just finished that GY!BE album. Listening to some toe. now

I put the dust cover down to make that anon happy.

File: Radiohead.amnesiac.albumart (2).jpg (81KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 300x300px

>>72728203
i figured as much, but what about the no text? i've only ever seen Amnesiac looking like pic related

>>72728253
did you spin it good

>>72728303
>OP again, just finished that GY!BE album.
How can you finish it? It's infinite.