>Extended note from 2010. The Beatles were not a terribly interesting band, but their fans were and still are an interesting phenomenon. I can only name religious fundamentalists as annoying (and as threatening) as Beatles fans, and as persevering in sabotaging anyone who dares express an alternate opinion of their faith. They have turned me into some kind of Internet celebrity not because of the 6,000 bios that i have written, not because of the 800-page book that i published, not because of the 30 years of cultural events that i organized, but simply because i downplayed the artistic merits of the Beatles, an action that they consider as disgraceful as the 2001 terrorist attacks.
>>72485567
>(and as threatning)
im just imagining piero seeing some kid with a beatles shirt on out in public and having to go to the bathroom to have a panic attack lol
>>72485579
beatles fans are notoriously violent people
>>72485567
I agree that the Beatles are significantly overrated, but damn... I don't think they're as mediocre as Scaruffi claims.
>>72485567
>Jakub Krawczynski sent me this supportive comment in 2010:
I find it quite amusing that almost all of the Beatles songs have their own entries on Wikipedia (nothing wrong with that in itself, actually), even if they are not singles, and each of them is meticulously dissected as if there were transcendental suites exceeding human comprehension, yet bands like Faust or Red Krayola, etc. have biographies even shorter than just one article about any random Beatles song. Needless to say, none of their songs have any articles on them, yet I'm sure there would be a lot more to talk about. Moreover, if you had put any bad review of their album on the site with the intention to show the broader scope of opinions, you'd risk your "life" there, since such fanatics don't accept any single sign of trying to be objective. You are seen as public enemy number 1 to them. It is like your article is one giant cognitive dissonance to them and vandalizing your bio was the only way to reduce this dissonance.
>>72485567
>>72485805
You guys know he's right
Only plebs disagree and make fun of Scaruffi
>>72485805
7 years on and this still triggers me
>>72485805
pepe_whispering_cuck_in_ear.jpeg
SUCKIN ON A DING DONG is somehow better than sgt peppers
epic
bump for justice and equality
>>72485567
Life is tough and complex, music appreciation is easy and relaxing. Is it really such a sin to use The Beatles as a cultural catharsis? Does music appreciation also have to be combative? We just want to be happy.
>>72486127
>>72486146
>>72486820
Can't say the Beatles suck without triggering Beatles fans.
It really is true.