What garage/punk bands with female vocals do you guys like? pic

>>72396076
i always thought white lung was pretty cool.

X-Ray Spex is the best punk band with female vocals

>>72396076
They don't need chastity belts.

>>72396191
Kathleen Hanna bit her so hard

>>72396196
that's a douchey thing to say

>>72396272
It's douchey that he's commenting on their appearance? It's douchey that he is saying they're ugly? Do you know where you are right now?

I'm a big fan of Joan Jett's covers just not her political views.

>>72396272
maybe anon is saying they're strong enough to resist sexual relations without the need of an outside help

>>72396272
>>72396479
kek

File: exene_cervenka_1981.jpg (47KB, 300x443px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 300x443px

>>72396191
only true if you remove the "-ray spex" from that sentence. although I do like them.

also check out Suburban Lawns and No Fun, OP

>>72396540
No, I wasn't. :)

WOAH! you can tell they're talented by how ugly they are, no women that hideous arn't going to have discernible skills

vexx

i love the vocalist from God is My Co-Pilot. Lovely voice.

>>72397031
mate ugliness and musical ability pretty much go hand in hand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17POuYkK1j0

is this what you're looking for op?

File: cover.jpg (302KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 700x700px

this album is nice, should be female vocals from what i remember but there's like 50 people on the record or some shit

>>72396985
tenth post best post

>>72396076
>if I strap meat to my groin, I can pretend your revulsion is an accomplishment

>>72397325
>being a misogynist

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4uEgcgJT8c

>>72397390
>defending shock tactics from a woman in her mid-forties

>>72396076
Afrirampo.

>>72397613
see>>72397390

KAS Product

Idk if it fully qualifies as garage/punk but the new Charly Bliss is some awesome grunge influenced pop, in the vein of The Muffs maybe, or a better Weezer with more distortion

File: Screenshot_6.png (803KB, 557x597px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 557x597px

>>72397748
>album that came out 3 days ago from a band with literally no other work is better than Weezer

what did he mean by this?

>>72397670
Fuck off son, you're on 4chan.

File: image.jpg (162KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1024x1024px

Veruca salt

>>72397788
That pop has never and will never be valued based on time served, and that Weezer are the most obviously mediocre group anyone can name, and that anyone with any imagination is going to be able to outstrip Rivers fucking Cuomo, the Bob Hope of indie rock.

File: sheer mag.jpg (202KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1200x1200px

>>72396076
Chastity Belt is great, but Sheer Mag kicks ass

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt-eSIHY5KY

check out Priests, OP

>>72397849
>Rivers fucking Cuomo, the Bob Hope of indie rock.

fucking kek

>>72397748
yea idk if this is b8 or not, but not only is weezer not some unfathomably good group, but idk why an album being recent or a debut makes it inherently less good? Like Vampire Weekend s/t is one of the best pop albums of 2000's, and that was a debut

>>72398008
>>72397788
oops here's your (you)

Rata Negra is fucking neat

>>72398008
>>72398029
>>72397849
More like its only been 3 days, I'm not saying that because Weezer is old its inherently better, or that debut's can't be good. But you have sat on an album for 3 days, by a group you have no reason to believe has lasting potential and already said it's better than one of the most influential and lauded power pop bands of the past 3 decades. You obviously did it to be an edge lord.

>>72396076
Notice how the pretty one is made to stand at the back. That's socialism in action.

>>72398308
No. Of course you're saying both of those things. You're rewording them, but you're saying that because this music is new, it can't be considered clearly better than something older, and that longevity = merit. I have heard hundreds of records I could tell you were better than Weezer twenty seconds in.

>>72398308
uh i genuinely did not do it to be an edgelord, i think they're better than weezer, and i certainly like them better than weezer. if this album were a weezer album it'd be my favorite weezer album, is that a better way to phrase it?

just because someone doesn't like weezer or doesn't think they're that good doesn't make them an edgelord, weezer is one of the more divisive groups for music fans out there, it's not like the smiths or something.

>>72398537
not even that guy but if you honestly think weezer is more divisive than the smiths you are a bonafide nitwit

>>72398618
Weezer are shit. The only people who don't think that are people who were the right age to be taken in by Pinkerton, the most anemic "heavy" album of all time, or people who like emo and have worked their way back to Pinkerton as a touchstone. Either way, the immature and tasteless. In the sense that rating them is an immediate badge of unseriousness, no, they aren't as "divisive" as The Smiths, a great group that some people dislike, but come on, they're dogshit, surpassing them is no implausible feat for a debut album.

>>72398618
idk i see way more threads about weezer with people being angry in them than the smiths, like i never see the smiths discussed on this board, at least not for the last year or two. and i don't meet anyone irl who hates the smiths either, so idk where all the smiths hot takes are hiding

>>72398734
well of course they aren't talked about here you have to be over 18 to post on 4chan

>>72398732
>>72398618
yeah I do like a couple weezer albums, but this guy is basically right. They aren't that good, they have like 4 songs on the blue album that are really catchy, and a few songs on Pinkerton that are really resonant with a kind of teenage angst, with a few good melodies, but they aren't actually that good. They didn't pioneer a sound, they didn't say anything new, i mean their lyrics are honestly bad most of the time, the only think Rivers Cuomo is good at is a pop melody, and he's not even that consistent at it.

>>72398787
lmao dawg The Smiths are one of the most beloved and critically acclaimed bands of all time, and if there's any demographic that's particularly fond of them it's people in their forties and fifties who discovered them in college.

>>72398835
i thought that your boy
>>72398732
established that liking something because you discovered it at the right time =/= quality

File: Screenshot_13.png (2MB, 818x816px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 818x816px

>>72398511
No i wasn't saying those things, but you can feel free to project whatever you want onto it.

> I have heard hundreds of records I could tell you were better than Weezer twenty seconds in.

wowww, hundreds you say. I am very impressed.

>>72398537
>weezer is one of the more divisive groups for music fans out there

Blue Album 3.93 on RYM
Pinkerton 3.89 on RYM

and don't do the "pssh RYM aren't real music fans" thing

Potty Mouth - The Spins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOFMyAMDKx0

>>72398876
Yeah, but let's be honest, nobody's going to step up for the Weezer are better than The Smiths argument, however much a certain generation holds them with especial fondness, a 17 year old can hear the latter for the first time now and say "whoa!", while they'd be more likely to hear Weezer and say "is that *it*?"

File: 1461913869331.png (119KB, 392x366px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 392x366px

>>72398732
>The only people who don't think that are people who were the right age to be taken in by Pinkerton, the most anemic "heavy" album of all time

it's power pop, it's heavy within that reference frame, is anyalbum thats not Merzbow heavy to you? No because that would be a retarted way of thinking about it.

> people who like emo and have worked their way back to Pinkerton as a touchstone

so people who enjoy the kind of music that it is and then discover it and enjoy it? spooky

>Either way, the immature and tasteless. In the sense that rating them is an immediate badge of unseriousness, no, they aren't as "divisive" as The Smiths, a great group that some people dislike, but come on, they're dogshit, surpassing them is no implausible feat for a debut album.


Was it your half japanese girl that Rivers bjorked?

>>72398960
>a 17 year old can hear the latter for the first time now and say "whoa"

see
>>72398787

>>72398906
It's not meant to be impressive. Anyone of average /mu/ age has heard hundreds of records better than Weezer.

>>72398876
are you trolling or just stupid? I made it very clear that The Smiths are one of the most beloved and critically acclaimed bands of all time. That's true, and it's a distinct point. All on its own. Dedicate some time to processing just this single point, that The Smiths are one of the most beloved and acclaimed bands. Got it?

Ok let's move on to why I mentioned that they were mostly loved by older people. Because you implied that they aren't discussed because only those under the age of 18 like them. The reason why I mentioned 45 year olds being their most passionate fans is to show you why that idea is wrong. It is not a supporting argument to the fact that they are good, which isn't even a claim that I made, just that they are one of the most beloved and acclaimed, which doesn't make them good, just not divisive.

I hope you're like 15 max, because your reading comprehension has a long ass way to go

>>72398960
I mean I'd step up that I enjoy Weezer more than The Smiths, mostly because I fucking hate jangle pop, most annoying music genre ever, but I imagine there are a lot of people who genuinely feel Weezer are a better band, probably people who grew up after Smith's time.

File: 1464827687356.jpg (26KB, 403x325px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 403x325px

>>72398991
uhh huhhhhh, wow you did it, what a big boy you are.

>>72398969
I mean heavy in terms of emotion. If Pinkerton is how Cuomo sounds when he's in a bad place, he *is* the Bob Hope of indie rock.

Be serious, emo is dogshit. If you're defending Pinkerton from an emo perspective, we are done here, I don't kick cripples.

Dude, you're defending *Weezer*.

File: 1462167835238.png (380KB, 888x960px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 888x960px

>>72399029
>I mean heavy in terms of emotion. If Pinkerton is how Cuomo sounds when he's in a bad place, he *is* the Bob Hope of indie rock.

yah and in terms of power pop its straight up raw, of course it's not fucking Minor Threat.

>Be serious, emo is dogshit.

dude im very impressed, i bet you listen to very important John Zorn records, and just don't have any time for such a dumb dumb genre

>>72398979
Wasn't my joke. The lack of Smiths threads puts them in line with all kinds of other music which if you put it on, most people would agree was superb but which never gets actively mentioned because there's not much any of us can add to the discussion. There will always be lewronggeneration guys who think nobody's ever loved the Stones more than they do, and there will always be new music that people feel evangelical about, but The Smiths... what can we add?

>>72396130
I agree with this. I dig White Lung. They're like a liberation bell. You hear it clear as day.

>>72398934
divisive doesn't necessarily mean hated, it just means that a lot of people have varying strong opinions about them. Like I would consider bands like Yes to be fairly divisive as well, and they have a few 3.9 or above albums on RYM. Same with Grateful Dead, and artists like Grimes. There's also a ton of really highly rated metal and prog albums on RYM that I think a lot of people would consider divisive.

>>72399107
this pretty much sums it up

>>72399077
Again, emotion, not sonics. Most of Big Star's output is rawer/creepier than Pinkerton.

File: ...autism.jpg (76KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 720x540px

>>72396479

>>72396522
While I'm glad she focuses on the meat industry's environmental impact rather than harping on morals I'm sad she works with an organization like PETA.

But yeah, if Joan Jett counts as a punk vocalist, I'll vote for her. She's the only chick rocker I can stand the voice of

File: 15march2012_thescreamingfemales-2.jpg (70KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1024x678px

I can't believe no one has mentioned Screaming Females yet

>>72399077

Further to >>72399156, I'd just add that I have love for all kinds of pop music, but emo has none of pop's virtues, it's for immature people, and I mean that without condescension - some music is meant purely to soundtrack young teenagers' crises, and emo is that music. If we're talking about that purpose, fine, but if we're comparing it to The Smiths, bitch please.

>>72399228
i don't think this is accurate, unless your definition of emo is super narrow. Do you feel this way about an album like Foxing's The Albatross? That album is mostly about addiction and serious mental illness, I don't see it as being for immature teenagers at all. And a lot of emo definitely has some of pop's virtues: clean, very melodic lines, usually in the guitar, straightforward emotion and lyricism, to name a couple. They're actually some of the more similar genres out there in a lot of ways, imo. I feel like, no shade, either your definition of emo is like just Modern Baseball and mall emo or you just haven't listened to that much of it.

>>72399288
>mostly about addiction and serious mental illness

Those are two very popular subjects with immature teenagers. Of course I haven't listened to much of it, I find it so dreadful that it makes me laugh and I don't listen to records for the irony much.

>>72399441
? just because something resonates with a group of people doesn't necessarily mean it's bad art. A lot of shithead teens love The Smiths, too. What is so bad about The Albatross, or American Football, or Football, etc. or math-influenced emo like This Town Needs Guns? Just like any other genre, there is good emo and bad emo. It's a huge genre, and so listening to just a few bands isn't really going to inform you on what "emo" is like as a genre any more than listening to A Love Supreme and Kind Of Blue and Live at the Plugged Nickel makes you know if jazz is a good genre or not.

What a retarded argument. Why compare any album to a classic that you don't like? You know that most people like the classic (in this case, pinkerton). You have to know that your opinion on that is an outlier, and you're just going to confuse people and incite argument by using your outlier opinion as a reference point.

>>72399540
I'm the guy who originally posted about Charly Bliss. I actually like a solid amount of Weezer, I just don't think they're very consistent. For me, Charly Bliss scratches a really similar itch to Weezer, with direct, not always great lyrics but really amazing pop melodies and chord progression. Charly Bliss is just a lot more grunge influenced than Weezer. I like them more, and I think if Weezer put out Guppy it'd be my favorite of theirs. Then everyone got all up in arms that I could possibly think a new band put out a debut that was better than Weezer. Again, I like Weezer, I just don't think they're that amazing of a band. I can like things I don't think are amazing.

>>72399195
My man! Screaming Females is the shit.

>>72399539
How much it "resonated with people" had nothing to do with the post you're replying to, I've already noted that it has its uses, but so does porn, and I stopped watching much porn after I started having sex. Emo is for kids trying out emotional crises for size. It has nothing to do with adult emotion or adult art. Teenagers read Wuthering Heights as well as Twilight. One is worth an adult's time, the other plainly fucking isn't, and there is no point in having a back-and-forth about it, The Albatross is never going into my ears, dude. I'm more likely to listen to a recording of actual albatross calls. I'm more likely to listen to TEN recordings of actual albatross calls. Enjoy your shitty music.

>>72396076
Savages
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zkz6qKCYjDM

>>72399601
I think you're right, Charly Bliss are better than Weezer, and my proof is that the guy who was offended by that idea is clearly a cocksucker.

>>72397211
Just gave it a listen, really liked this album but did not hear a single female vocal ...

>>72399687
The point was that just because music about addiction and mental illness is popular with teens doesn't mean it's just for teens or has less artistic merit, which is what your post clearly implied. Believe it or not, adults can struggle with mental illness, heartbreak, and substance abuse as well, and so if music speaks to those issues well there's no reason to say it shouldn't be considered good, or "adult," art. The reason Twilight is bad is because the content good. You clearly have no idea what the content of The Albatross is, or most emo music for that matter, which makes your criticism invalid. Go listen to a MAGIC! album and write off pop, or Kenny G and write off jazz. It's just as easy to do if you choose to never expose yourself to the highlights of the genres.

>>72396076
boy howdy, that girl on the right is one ugly cuss

>>72399754
>adults can struggle with mental illness, heartbreak and substance abuse

I've "struggled with" all three, son. All of music is about emotion, emo is about the emotions of people to whom nothing has yet happened. Fuck you. Of course the music doesn't "speak to" those issues well. I don't have to eat fifty turds to decide what kind of turd is the least vomit-inducing.

>>72396272
https://www.tumblr.com/
https://www.reddit.com/
https://9gag.com/

Cherry Glazerr is good af

>>72397838
this

>>72401368
you're a pretty special kind of unpleasant to interact with, even for this board. if emo is about substance abuse or heartbreak, written by people who have experienced those things, then I hate to burst your bubble, but that means that emo can be about the emotions of people to whom things have happened. You're the musical equivalent of a kid who won't try food because it "looks gross" or "tommy likes it and i hate tommy". Most people grow out of judging stuff they haven't exposed themselves to by like, 16 at latest, but since you called me "son" i guess that means you're a big strong mature adult man.

>>72401914
Teenagers get their hearts broken and sniff glue. They have no perspective on their emotions, and nothing has yet touched them deeply. Most kids have no fucking clue what real fear is - emo isn't aimed at the few who do, but at the suburban many who have allowances. Adults who, having experienced heavy shit, can turn it into consumable dreck for kids, other adults find suspicious at best. Emo is false on every level. By definition, it's music for people who think they've invented feelings. Get some perspective kid.

>>72396076
My favorite girl punk group is Girlpool, really great female guitar/bass duo from LA, they have two records out and I believe they're in cherry glazer too but im not entirely sure

>>72402080
not the dude you're talking to but you're 100% right

File: trashwomen-1.jpg (167KB, 900x1032px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 900x1032px

ITT: two shitheads argue about weezer and drugs.

>>72402416
lmao it has to be more than 2, there's like 30 replies

>>72397165
kinda yeah

>>72396076
>discover new music i like
>ask for more
>the entire thread digresses into shitpost in about feminism and weeee
rip

File: 500.jpg (25KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 300x300px

no one said these yet?

File: a2728979343_16.jpg (16KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 700x700px

I like Perfect Pussy even though /mu/ seems to hate them vigorously.

File: 14586755672331.jpg (149KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x820px

>>72397390

File: reddit.jpg (15KB, 493x134px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 493x134px

>>72403931

>>72399750
idk there's a lady named Sam listed on vocals, but there's also a dude singing. And it's not "clean" female vocals so what you thought were a guy might've been the lady

>>72396076
>post-punk
Au pairs
The raincoats