Who else is into 60s peruvian punk/garage rock? Why isnt /mu

File: front.jpg (58KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 450x450px

>>72239878
Another great artist from Peru. This song is probably the most popular by them and its in spanish but very appealing stuff
https://youtu.be/ywe1fj-Jdas

File: belkings.jpg (59KB, 640x628px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x628px

Los Belkings are my fav
https://youtu.be/3_ny6laeB9Y
https://youtu.be/Q3T-PCfMcVA

File: Screenshot_2017-04-17-11-34-37-1.png (2MB, 1113x1122px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1113x1122px

Tfw short and white and cant dance for shit but thoroughly enjoy cumbia
This shit is so catchy
https://youtu.be/tZKPy4carhM

>>72239878
Its too bad peru is full of panhandlers and shitty water and disease. The culture there is really awesome and the music scene is nice but it's a sad place. Perfect place to get robbed and die from spider bite though.

>>72240055
That's ok most Peruvians are around 5 feet tall.

>>72240252
What are peruvians like anon?

>>72240519
small indians

>>72239878
Los Saicos aren't punk. It' 60s pop rock played by spics that can't be bothered to tune their guitar. Ultimate music snob band. It's so bad you convince yourself it's good.

>>72240765
Well that's the spirit of punk!

>>72239878
Not peruvian but close
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7tt4BsPnXE

>>72240790
No it's not. You don't know what you're talking about.

>>72240827
Not him but why should I trust you over all the sources I've read that call them proto-punk? Just because they're "spics that can't be bothered to tune their guitar" doesn't make them not proto-punk.

>>72240545
They arent THAT ugly

>>72239878
This is the first time ever a /mu/ rec was good. Thank you anon

>>72240859
No they're not proto punk because like i said before it's literally just poorly played pop rock. The reason you shouldn't trust those sources is music nerds have this undying urge to label older and older things as proto punk. I've seen multiple call Herman's Hermits proto punk and that couldn't be anymore wrong. They were a radio group.

>>72240859
If i told you Chuck Berry was proto punk you'd shrug it off because he wasn't. He undoutbeldy had a hand in creating what would eventually lead to punk rock but he had nothing to do with punk. It wasn't even a thing when he was alive. Same goes for all these 60s bands people wanna attach proto punk to even though it's just a music nerd thing more than it is anything else. Only thing is these 60s bands didn't help invent rock n roll.

>>72241024
By alive i meant at the height of his career. That was my bad.

Only tangentially related, here's a good Chilean group of a similar vintage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynU8t66S8dc

>>72240922
What do you call entierro de los gatos? It's pretty punk or at least proto punk to me

>>72239878
I'm trying to. Anything that isn't English made or American consumers bait

>>72240765
The great thing about music in general is that everything is open to opinion and nothing is really constricted or defined by one label. Interpretation is key. Your interpretation is all your own, isn't that what punk is about? Doing what you want disregarding labels and framework? And most definitely not tuning your guitar properly? What is punk to you?

>>72240806
Great album! What about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8KM7ktgwPE