>1973
>pic related is critically acclaimed but commercially very very very unsuccessful
>only patricians know about this album
now what will /mu/ do about it in the future 2017?
>>72214208
I'd buy a t-shirt and listen to most of every song
>commercially very very very unsuccessful
huh? it wasn't
>>72214343
me too I think, but I'll still not listen to Money while listening to the album, albeit they never played that song on radio
I mean I won't delete it, but yeah
it still just ruins the mood of the album for me
>>72214353
um, 741 weeks
>>72214353
Theoretical dumbass
>>72214208
It would be mu-core and I'd probably love it I've never listened to the whole thing but from what I understand it's experimental but also the highest selling album ever
>>72214437
>theoretical dumbass
holy shit he said
>it wasn't
,when I literally read
>it wasn't?
>it would be mu-core
thanks anon, just wanted to read that
most anons here don't understand that just because some music is commercially successful doesn't make it overrated, overrated is something that doesn't deserve the success and acknowledgement it got
so glad to see someone else understands that
>>72214208
It's the second best sold album of the world
>>72214353
retard
>>72214754
>theoretical dumbass
I M A G I N E
M
A
G
I
N
E
>>72214754
>theoretically
>>72214774
What is theoretical you faggot
>>72214792
OP is you dimwit
>>72214805
What. I'm not op.
Just tell me what you mean by theoretical
in the 70s/80s occasionally popular music coincided with really good music. pink floyd made some pretty good music. honestly i think they only succeeded because album art + title looking/sounding so cool.