why did all their albums get such poor/mixed reviews when all

literally only pitchfork panned them

They didn't. Stop using Pitchfork as your only review source.

>>72034517
>>72034527
rolling stone, nme, the guardian
metascores all below 80 apart from deloused

>>72034509
>they're too pretentious lmao

>>72034509
who cares?

File: 12106751_1196653153682022_5087302849471724693_n.jpg (6KB, 261x190px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 261x190px

>>72034540
>every score lower than an 8 is negative

>>72034509
MY MY MY

>>72035883
SHARONA

>>72034817
Seriously, the Frances the Mute review gave me brain cancer. Like, 90% of it was about how pretentious indie and prog rock is and the other 10% was very half-assed 'analysis' of the record. I get it if the guy didn't like it but holy shit he disliked it for the wrong/not real reasons.

>>72034509
How about you quit being an insecure bitch and stop reading shillfork reviews.

>all of them
>absolutely banging
you're being equally deluded

>>72036800
>you're being equally deluded
nah, but he's certainly being de-loused

>>72034509
There's only one critic that really matters, and I think we all know his opinion on these guys

>>72037132
What did he say?

>>72035219
yeah, for all the classics they've put out