Remember when RAM leaked on /mu/ and everyone listened to it

RAM is poo poo pee pee.

>>71863026
>implying Give Life Back to Music isn't a great opener

>>71863026
seriously, who gives a fuck
it's a shitty band

>>71863048
It's fine but damn Contact is a hype opening track

Nobody would give a shit about daft punk if they didn't wear those stupid gimmick robot outfits. "Wanting to stay anonymous and private" my ass.

>>71863048
It's a good song, but Contact should have been first. Contact has insane buildup with no real payoff. If you put it as the opener though, it would build hype up for the later tracks

>>71863084
>>71863170
Actually I just relistened to Give Life now and I agree it doesn't start like an album opener or as good as Contact would've been. I still think it's a good opener though because the main idea of the album is Daft Punk giving life back to funk, so it makes sense.

>>71863097
Well the majority of people don't know what they look like so I guess it worked out for them

>>71863265
Aren't they just a couple greasy french dudes? No one wants to see that shit

>>71863307
just kill yourself man instead of hating widely loved and established artists on a music board

>>71863026
>Remember when RAM leaked on /mu/ and everyone listened to it at once and the track order was reversed so we all thought Contact was the first song and it was basically the best possible opening song for the album, but then we were all disappointed because it was the wrong order.
I don't but I do remember when the full version of Get Lucky leaked and everyone thought it was fake because of how basic and amateur it sounded but then it turned out to be the legit thing and then everyone started calling it SOTYAY.

>>71863393
Granted though there were a ton of fakes floating around based on an 8 second loop from SNL or something