Has anyone so comprehensively btfo the haters before?
The term haters gets thrown around a ton, but this man was, and still is, made fun of on a regular basis.
He's now the most popular artist on the planet, and has a net worth beyond most people's wildest dreams. Seriously, there's rich and there's what Drake has now.
Please post all blessings to drizzy in this thread.
Thank you based Drake
Thank you based Drake
Just because he's rich doesn't mean I have to worship him
big whoop he's got sum money wanna fite about it?
>>71750845
>being rich means you make good art
there's a flaw in this argument somewhere but i can't for the life of me point it out
>>71750868
>>71750886
You guys are missing the point. The money is just vindication that people like what he puts out, and any doubt whether or not he's made it has long gone.
It's pretty much undeniable how well he's done, and how far he's gone. The amount of artists that will achieve this level of success is a very select few, and I still think it's funny to see people say he's not the shit.
>>71750953
he's not the shit.
Drake's is a culture vulture. and his fake accents and cringey as fuck. That being said,
"If You're Reading This It's Too Late" & "What A Time To Be Alive" are great projects.
>>71750953
M8 u will never convince me the man who uses google images for his album covers is the shit.
>>71751125
Wasn't this just for WATTBA?
>>71751102
Congrats, enjoying the albums Fantano tells you to enjoy. If character means so much to you, maybe try doing more research into other artists, you might discover that all that glitters is not always gold...
>>71750845
Thank you based drizzy. May there be thicc mamis in my future
I'M BLEM SENPAI!
MORE CHUNES FOR YA HEAD TOPS YA UNRULY TINGS!
6!
>>71753088
Blem actually makes sense though
Ed Sheeran > Drake
>>71750845
Honestly I'm happy for him. I used to think he was kind of a cheesy faggot, but then I saw this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKqmXJtDh7Y
>>71750845
If you're putting effort into defending Drake or legitimizing him as an artist, you're a hopeless pleb. Only in a field of absolute trash could Drake be a serious player
>>71753206
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQwiW6YE6eM
>>71750845
OK, I don't hate Drake. I don't particularly enjoy his music, but I don't hate him.
He's like, the rap industry's token fuck boy. If you boil it down, it's that but a little sadder because Nikki still hasn't had sex with him.
>>71750845
>this man was, and still is, made fun of on a regular basis
>>71753327
Why do you think this?
What are you reasons for disliking Drake so much that you immediately think that anyone who enjoys his music is objectively incorrect?
Softest rapper in the game three years in a row
>>71753408
who held the title before aubrey?
>>71753406
Because nothing Drake has ever done will be relevant within ten years
>>71753417
Ja Rule
>>71753443
Ja Rule was not relevant as of 4 years ago lol
>>71753408
This criticism makes no sense. These "hard" rappers usually define their worth and how hard they are by how much they can spend or the possessions they can buy.
Pretty much everyone else in the game is a poorfag to Drake, and these rappers are playing the exact same game he is. They do media appearances, they push their music, all to sell records, yet they're still not as successful, and never will be.
Drake clearly wasn't in it for the same reasons (something he explicitly states), but he's still passively doing better at objectives that aren't his primary ones, than most rappers do at the goal they actively pursue
>>71753441
This is really going to be the end of the argument eventually. I'm trying to take this as objectively as possible, but Drake is an ineffective rapper because he hasn't done anything noticeably influential.
>>71753458
It's a reference to Ghost Face Killa's softest rappers in the game. I think Drake has actually won the softest for the last 6 years. Ja Rule wasn't necessarily relevant, but he was still the softest rapper from like, 2002-2009.
>>71753441
Except for the multiple records he's broken, being the progenitor of music in a city that now somehow he gave relevance, and a cultural influence that exceeds pretty much every rapper that came before him
>in b4 muh biggie and Tupac
Purely be way of the information age we live in, no one rap artist (barring kanye) has had the cultural reach Drake has. There is a video of the current president of the United States of America dancing in a parody of his music for Christ sakes.
Try again.
>>71753467
This is an entirely immature view of rap music. Being a hard rapper isn't necessarily a genre. It's more of a flow, and lyrical content.
Drake has punchlines and clever phrasing. He's the court jester of rap. Kendrick, for instance, is hard. Not because he raps about his possessions, but because he's real as fuck. Drake might be real to himself, but that doesn't mean he isn't softer than a goose down maxi pad.
>>71753523
>no one rap artist (barring kanye) has had the cultural reach Drake has
kendrick lamar, j cole, jay z
>>71753523
>that now somehow he gave relevance
He didn't though. After Drake's gimmick is done, nobody is going to give a shit about Toronto unless someone big comes out of it again.
As an example, nobody really respects Seattle's music scene because they haven't had anything big since grunge. Macklemore was a one-hit wonder and those never count, btw.
>>71753523
>no one rap artist (barring kanye) has had the cultural reach Drake has
Are you fucking 12 years old?
>>71753540
Can you clear up for me what you mean by hard/soft?
He's obviously never going to be a dude straight out of Compton, but does that inhibit your ability to enjoy his music, that never tries to be straight out of Compton?
>>71753542
>>71753569
>the two of you
>in charge of missing the point entirely
http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/7728843/drake-breaks-apple-music-spotify-streaming-records-more-life
The Internet age has allowed for unprecedented reach. This is a fact.
>J cole or Jay z more relevant that Drake
JUST
>Kendrick
Debatable, doesn't do the numbers Drake does
i just created a porn account under the name of drizzy
>>71750845
Him being so popular is just a reflection on how shit most mainstream music is, to be honest.
>>71753589
I mean that he raps about either emo shit, or having shit. His rap is very surface-level. It's soft.
I've never been able to vibe with the "haters" concept. It seems like the most narcissistic thing imaginable.
>>71753350
>Drake crying about nuggies
Literally one of us
>>71753978
t. Someone who's never been better than others and have them come at you
>>71753626
OK, spotify's streaming record is not the benchmark for cultural impact.
I get that this was a big achievement, but in no way does it define someone's impact on the art-form of rap.
ITT: A Drake fanboy defends his fetish against an unforgiving foe.