ITT: post 10/10 albums >inb4 it's not a 10/10 Ratings

>>71688678
can't wait to git you grimesfags banned again :)

best grimes desu

>>71688678
help i have voices of patrician ghosts in my head trying to tell me not everything is equal stop it stop it shut up! get out!

>>71688678
MODS!!!

File: InRainbows.jpg (23KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 225x225px

>>71688678
no.

>>71688768
#8: Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.

Are you ready to be banned?

>>71688696
>grimesfags
>expecting to be taken seriously

>>71688800
are you?

>>71688678
It's a 9/10.

>>71689111
Still a good rating. 10/10 for me, AOTDSF.

what's with the grimes banter
why do grimes obsessers and grimes haters feud so harshly and constantly

File: 1487524763547.png (107KB, 482x813px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 482x813px

>>71689235
The reason why Grimes tends to get so much vitriol directed her way by her detractors is because she excels at making subversive art.

Nearly every aspect of her visual art or music that you can name is pretty easily traceable to an obvious source of inspiration (as long as you know where to look.) However the purposes to which she puts things are almost always completely alien to the originals, meaning that - for people favourably inclined towards her artistic style - consuming her art enables you to see/experience things you already know about in a new light. The experience is literally mind-expanding. It's disturbing - in a good way.

However, for people who don't happen to like her artistic style or subversive art in general, this purposeful introduction of unfamiliarity regarding already known things tends to make people upset and angry. Add to this the incredibly personable manner in which she has always interacted with fans online from day one, and it should be no mystery why she always manages to inspire such epic levels of controversy - despite not really being all that controversial herself, technically speaking.

>>71689443
>consuming her art enables you to see/experience things you already know about in a new light.
name 5 examples

>>71689472
you normies wouldn't understand

File: IMG_1805.jpg (29KB, 208x210px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 208x210px

>>71688678
>muh subjectivity
>muh opinions cant be wrong
>muh music discussion is ultimatley le fruitless le because le everything le is le subjective
wow you grimesfaggots really are new huh

>>71690660
Read this
>People spend more time talking shit about bands they hate or artists think are overrated than the music they actually like. They sound a bit like children at the dinner table sticking their tongues out and saying "I hate broccoli!" Who freakin' cares if you don't like something? Move on. There is no such thing as "bad music" (or good music, for that matter.) Musicians make noises and either we respond to it or we don't. End of story. Despite what you may think, you are NOT defined by the music you listen to and you are not cool. You are just another consumer, regardless of your taste.

Now, shut the fuck up.

>>71689226
And hello to you too.

>>71690762
>People spend more time talking shit about bands they hate or artists think are overrated than the music they actually like.
cool meaningless non-statistic that whatever dumbass who wrote this pulled out of his ass
>There is no such thing as "bad music" (or good music, for that matter.)
nice reddit meme, if you genuinley believe that then neck yourself
>Despite what you may think, you are NOT defined by the music you listen to and you are not cool.
oh no my feelings

kys faggot

File: MCRThreeCheers.jpg (36KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 300x300px

>>71688678

>>71690867
>being incapable of handling the truth

>>71690867
>spotted the autist

>>71690762
That's extremely false

File: IMG_2108.jpg (56KB, 360x261px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 360x261px

>>71690970
its not "the truth"

everything, literally everything, is "subjective," including things like 2 plus 2 equalling 4. It only equals four subjectivley. Its why centering discussion around le subjectivitey meme is fucking dumb. You'd know this if you had been here for more than 2 weeks but we both know that isnt possible.

I cant stress enough that you should end your life as soon as possible

>>71691076
If I have two pieces of candy and billy gives me two more pieces of candy how many pieces of candy do I have
Subjective my ass

>>71691096
how can billy "give you" candy? how is the candy as being distinguished from billy owning it to now you? wouldnt it still be billy's candy, but he's simply allowing you to eat it, but its still his? Ergo you still only have 2 pieces of candy duuruururr subjectivity durrurureerrrrrurr

>>71691096
Think of it like this:

2 raindrops + 2 raindrops don't equal 4 rain drops, it equals a puddle, or 1 big rain drop, there are different perspectives and different ways to look at specific things

>>71689443
good b8 but tldr

>>71691076
>like
Things aren't subjective. Only people's experiences of them ARE. Hence the term "subjective", as in subject-ive - I.e. from the experiencial point of view of a (human) subject.

>>71691080
see
>>71688840

>>71691953
>Things aren't subjective
yes they are

look up solopsism

i dont understand
so we just fucking post any album and call it a 10/10 and thats it?

gnarly thread.

File: Folder.jpg (186KB, 1410x1411px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1410x1411px

shiina ringo

that's a solid 4/10

File: IMG_2810.png (155KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 300x300px

>>71692012
Personally pic related is a 10/10 for me

File: Best fucking album ever.jpg (81KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 300x300px

10/10 for me

>>71691155
>>71691221
see
>>71691953

>>71692003
Solopsism objectively doesn't exist. It's a meaningless argument because it can't be proved true or false.

>>71691684
>describing non-bait as b8 about after openly admitting to not having read it
And I bet you wonder why people think you're stupid.

>>71692085
>WHERE'S MY SEX?
>I THOUGHT IT WAS HERE

File: swish.jpg (6KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 1080x1080px

the only objective 10/10

>>71691155
>>71691221
are you trying to tell me two and two don't add up to four

>>71691076
You're confusing subjective opinions with cold hard facts. "Grimes is bad" is subjective, 2+2=4 is objective. See the difference, dipshit.

>>71691076
>It only equals four subjectivley
retard

File: C0BdHycXEAASCNm[1].jpg (72KB, 981x552px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 981x552px

>generic acid synths
>generic pop percussion
>high pitched whispery vocals
Grimes fans:

>>71691684
How do you know it's bait if you didn't even read it, dumbass?

>>71693146
>You're confusing subjective opinions with cold hard facts.
"Cold hard facts" dont exist

you have NO IDEA what the fuck you're talking about, please just shut the fuck up

>>71691953
"things" are perfectly subjective

everything is subjective if you do enough mental gymnastics

just shut up