what exactly did The White Stripes and Foo Fighters do to

Really loaded quesiton. All the Foo Fighters are guilty of is making incredibly safe over-produced buttrock. They haven't done anything significant enough to warrant being accused of killing rock music on their own.

Neither did anything other than be completely over rated and derivative as fuck.

Sure they're loud but their music is mediocre and lacking stage presence.

If people watched prime The Who or Cream they'd get a taste of what rock should be.

If anything bands like them kept rock a little popular for a while before it died completely (in the mainstream, of course)

>>71552398
>>71552414
>>71552474
>>71552556
What exactly killed rock then?

>>71553047
Paper

>>71553047
Dough

>>71552352
>what exactly did The White Stripes and Foo Fighters do to kill rock music?
They gave them exactly what they wanted, and nothing more.

File: 1485816669666.png (53KB, 136x124px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 136x124px

>>71553047
Kurt Cobains alternative rock beatles formula that hasn't changed since he dies. Everyone just copies the same generic early 90s sound, either that or hair metal.

It'll come back though, don't you worry, true believers.

>>71553047
white guilt

>>71553047
the fans

>>71553162
satanic trips of heresy

>>71553062
Underrated

>>71553047
Bedroom musicians with their computers and pop radio moving away from guitars

>>71552414
name a rock band who isnt derivative

>>71553047
Radiohead

>>71553047
numales

>>71555088
>trips
>filename

lurk more newfag

>>71553047
Lack of innovation
Parody of itself
Dadrock fags and indie fags

>>71553047
Post grunge and NME hyping mediocre bands

>>71557446
this

>tfw flaming lips released a "psychedelic/experimental" ablum comprised of shitty synth sounds, boring hip hop beats, and cheesy vocals

>>71557469
This what? That anon is a faggot and so are you. Flaming Lips are fucking great so fuck off.

>>71557506
flaming lips are great but you can't deny their lacking in innovation

i should've made my post more clear but i'm saying most rock bands now aren't doing anything other than going back to indie shit or dad rock stuff

>>71557536
*they're
im retarded

>>71553047
'''indie'''

>>71557536
>>71557469
>lacking in innovation
A four-disc album meant to be played all at the same time isn't innovative?

>>71557592
I'm saying now not in 1997

>>71557619
Nice backpedaling

>>71557619
A 24-hour rock song isn't innovative?

File: DO YOU UNDERSTAND.jpg (191KB, 1440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1440x1440px

>>71557637
>backpedaling
>"psychedelic/experimental"
>shitty synth sounds
>boring hip hop beats
>cheesy vocals

>>71557664
>"psychedelic/experimental"
How is it not experimental?

>>71553175
>>71555538
>>71555624
>>71557637
>>71557656

mu is so far gone now. why are 15 year olds incapable of common sense

>>71557691
it's nothing new

>>71557714
No I asked how it wasn't experimental, not how it wasn't innovative.

Do you know the difference, or are you 14?

>>71553047

it focused too much on image rather than innovation

the concept of a "rockstar" became ingrained in pop culture and this stifled rock, while other genres continue to push boundaries

>>71557702
Why aren't you?

>>71553047
The Black Keys ruined it

>>71552474
As someone who's been to a white stripes show.

It was very, very present.
Behind Death Grips it was the 2nd Loudest most in your chest sound I've ever witnessed live.

I'm not even a huge white stripes guy Im just saying.

>mah innovation!
Who cares? That's not what rock is about. rock is about a more primal expression of emotion. Innovation is more an intellectual pursuit and is more akin to electronic music.

>>71557808
why not both?

>>71557827
Rock seems like it's all been done, you have to go into sub genres to be innovative

>>71557827
Well you can, but then you need to accept it becomes less commercial, and you shouldn't go looking for it in the mainstream.
>mah rock is dead because it's not mainstream!

>>71557846
See>>71557808

>>71552474
>The Who
My nigga

>>71557856
well yeah, and there isn't anything wrong with that either.

btw i don't agree that rock is dead

rock ded

trap music now

>>71557808
Rock is not about anything except for doing your own thing however ridiculous it may appear to others.

>>71557924
>doing your own thing
What does that even mean?

>>71557908
I seriously love traps too

>>71557938
expressing yourself and not caring of the reception?

>>71557938
you don't get rock then, sorry.

>>71553062
kek

>>71557938

it means you pretend to not give a shit about what others think so you can deflect actual criticism

>>71557947
Read: primal expression of emotion

>>71557976
i see what you mean

>>71557967
>>71557976

>>71557976
we can agree on this

>>71557976

>muh EMOTION

yeah sorry, emotion is cool and everything, but for a genre to stay alive there has to be actual innovation as several people have already pointed out.

>>71558024
>>muh EMOTION
Except that's the point of all music

>>71557908
>average trap fan

>>71558037

not really

also you can have both

>>71555191
King Crimson

>>71558049
>not really
Example?

>>71558063

a lot of avant-garde music was made with the intent of pushing the boundaries of what can be done with instruments and composition and sound in general, rather than trying to be emotional

>>71558068
>pushing the boundaries of what can be done with instruments
Why? Why would the artists do this?

rock music sucks now
because majority of these kids can't play guitar worth a shit
can't remember hearing a good riff in the last decade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PAd41W-o4g
make guitar music good again pls

>>71557446
>Parody of itself
Holy shit, this.
The whole ironic self-parodying postmodern shtick has, in my opinion, completely ruined culture today because everybody is too fucking afraid to actually speak their mind so they just mask everything in irony. Nobody wants to actually innovate anymore.

>>71558111
>Nobody wants to actually innovate anymore.
See >>71557808

>>71558111
postmodern has died already

>>71558111
>because everybody is too fucking afraid to actually speak their mind so they just mask everything in irony. Nobody wants to actually innovate anymore.
wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7h3bd2YSWs

>>71558119
>postmodern has died already
According to my gender studies class, it hasn't.

>>71558149
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamodernism

>>71553047
I belief the term "indie" killed it, especially slapping the indie term on anything 2005-2012 (i.e indie rock, indie folk, indie pop etc.)

>>71558183
Indie was supposed to be 'independent' as in not part of a label but these faggots turn it into a genre which till this day still triggers the hell out of my anus.

>>71558149
All this bullshit like post-colonial studies, gender studies, X studies etc. can be easily BTFO'd by a bunch of honest, dedicated intelligent professors in a matter of weeks.

>>71558183
This. Basically desensitizing the whole rock’n roll persona. This actually makes new way for the new image of how a “rock” band should look in terms of style and musicality. Pitchfork (and other music journalism outlets) catering for these new type of music with the propagation of “nu-males” makes it worse/fast.

>>71558196
Yeah, I could see back in the 2000s the Arctic Monkeys were indie, but now it's just trashy Marlbro Red rock.

>>71558183
I actually agree. Indie rock played by skinny 20-something Bohemians took the testosterone and edginess out of rock, which had been an aspect of rock since its earliest days

>>71553047
Rock music became a really safe genre. I don't just mean radio friendly stuff, but shoegaze, indie etc. Even the experimental bands have kinda stayed in a rut. Can you really say A Moon Shaped Pool is groundbreaking, for example. It's good but the sound has been done before. People have this idea of what rock music should sound like and nobody wants to deviate from it really. For some weird reason music fans and the public don't seem to want to call the genre out for it. Everyone seems content with just accepting it or complaining but still listening. Hell I'm guilty of the latter though. Rock needs a band to come in and tear shit up. But, nobody seems to want to do it.

>>71558079

because it's interesting and exciting

not everyone shits themselves over three chords and singing about love

File: EmersonLakePalmer_Album.jpg (40KB, 400x303px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x303px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71552352
The Strokes killed rock music.

>>71553047
synths and online stream listeners

Rock got its wish and died before it got old.

File: yes.jpg (73KB, 468x357px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 468x357px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: king-crimson-1974-granger.jpg (73KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 900x617px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: 1468705112874.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x250px

>>71555538
you take that back

>>71557799
This!

File: pepe looks at you displeasedly over his book.png (22KB, 804x743px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 804x743px

>>71558975
>>71559281
>>71559495

> prog isn't masculine

Thank God I had the opportunity to see the Descendents live here in São Paulo... damn... new bands are such a piece of shit

File: 82f03e1d39b652c56b194d1d97cf10bb.jpg (31KB, 500x503px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x503px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71558463
modern rock (read: alternative and indie rock) is great exactly because it doesn't have "testosterone and edginess of rock, which had been an aspect of rock since its earliest days"

>>71560275
I'm not saying modern rock is bad, I'm saying it fell out of favor and relevance because it lost that edginess

File: TALKING-HEADS550b1.jpg (51KB, 550x310px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 550x310px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71558975
>>71559281
>>71559495
>>71560259
>>71560420

> look! nu-males made underground music at the same time rock was big!
> thus, rock was never masculine

>>71560448
>any of the bands listed
>underground
You're a special kind of retard, aren't you?

File: Pink_Floyd_-_all_members.jpg (58KB, 385x355px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 385x355px

Also, before I forget:
>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

Foo Fighters and The White Stripes killed rock n roll because they created such easily copied and marketable templates for every rock band to follow if they wanted to become popular and the market became over saturated.
However, if anything, the bands that came after like The Black Keys and Cage the Elephant have done more damage to rock

>>71560646
Prog rock during the 70s was looks at pretty much the same way by the old school rock n rollers as indie rock is today.
Brainy music with no balls or soul.

>>71558725
>exciting
That is an emotion.

Nice try though

>>71559495
have you listened to king crimson? especially during the wetton era i think king crimson's sound was dripping with testosterone and a sort of dark edge that no one else was doing in the prog rock scene

EASSYYYYYYYYY MONEYYYYYYYYY

>fuck off Rockists, don't put your genre expectations/standards into mine!
>but it's OK if rock doesn't live up to my expectations of innovation
Bleepfags kys

I think the main thing is the music press (for the most part) has an absolute refusal to accept rock is dead. Also they constantly overate shitty bands.

I hate the music press fuck those guys.

>>71553062
Hehe

>>71553062
hehehehe

>>71555538
radiohead is the best band of all time

>>71552352
The Foo Fighters made it safe, clean, comfortable, and vanilla as fuck. The White Stripes became too big.

>>71560879
Sounds like you have an absolute refusal to believe rock is alive, and to overrate shitty non-rock bands.

Fuck you.

>>71560920
ha ha ha hee hee hee
im a laughing gnome and you cant catch me

>>71560819
Sure, the music itself was fairly masculine (TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY SCHIZOID MAN), but come on, just look at Fripp. Half the time he looked like a stodgy professor, the other half he looked like a stodgy professor's student. That's not even to speak of Greg Lake, Adrian Belew, Bill Bruford, and the other skinny wimps that /mu/ back then would have called nu-males.

>>71560952
Name me one great band from the last 7 years that the press has hyped. One band.

>>71561005
Define "great"

>>71561005
the libertines and arctic monkeys

>>71560964
yeah they definitely have the look of a bunch of wimps, but they sure knew how to make some ferocious music. love how explosive bill bruford was on red.

>>71552352
You have 10 seconds to name a rock band from the last 25 years that is both critically acclaimed and culturally relevant. Please note that commercial success is not synonymous with cultural relevance.

Impossible Mode: No Nirvana.

Oh wait, you can't.

R.I.P Rock

Please note:
>The Strokes, Arctic Monkeys, Queens of the Stone Age, The Mars Volta, Franz Ferdinand, The Smashing Pumpkins, Oasis, Bloc Party, The Libertines, Blur, Pulp, Suede, and Interpol are not culturally relevant, as they have had no real cultural impact. You're not going to hear their music being played at a high school dance or have a large number of normies sharing them on Facebook or in the future remembering them the way you would a contemporary artist who actually has made a cultural impact (e.g. Beyonce, Kendrick, Kanye, Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber)
>Jack White is not a culturally relevant artist. Seven Nation Army may be a culturally relevant track but having only one culturally relevant track indicates a lack of longevity and thus a lack of cultural relevance as artists.
>Weezer only have one critically acclaimed album and it came out 23 years ago.
>Muse, Foo Fighters, Coldplay, Tool, Kings of Leon, The 1975, Alt-J, The Black Keys, Pearl Jam, Green Day, My Chemical Romance, Fall Out Boy, Blink-182, Brand New, Taking Back Sunday, Mumford & Sons, and Red Hot Chili Peppers are not critically acclaimed.
>The Flaming Lips, Sufjan Stevens, Vampire Weekend, Tame Impala, The National, The Hold Steady, Dinosaur Jr, Deerhunter, Mac DeMarco, Porcupine Tree, Beach House, Ween, Titus Andronicus, Bon Iver, Pixies, Spoon, Pavement and Modest Mouse are far too niche to be considered culturally relevant. This is also true for all metal.
>R.E.M., Bruce Springsteen, and U2 have not been critically acclaimed in the last 25 years.
>LCD Soundsystem, Radiohead and Arcade Fire are not rock bands

File: <3 <3 matty <3 <3.jpg (22KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x333px

>>71561054
>The 1975 are not critically acclaimed

>mfw

>>71561054
g2b Gene

>>71561054
benis :DD

>>71561017
Kick ass awesome great music, its fucking easy m8 we all know what great means.
>>71561023
I said the last 7 years those are 2000s bands which aren't even that good.

>>71561054
Silverchair m8

>>71561054
>The Strokes, Oasis are not culturally relevant
>Vampire Weekend, Tame Impala, Bon Iver are too niche
>Radiohead is not rock
Exquisite bait

>>71561120
OK then Wilco, Flaming Lips, Radiohead

>>71561054
>The Strokes, Arctic Monkeys, Queens of the Stone Age, The Mars Volta, Franz Ferdinand, The Smashing Pumpkins, Oasis, Bloc Party, The Libertines, Blur, Pulp, Suede, and Interpol are not culturally relevant, as they have had no real cultural impact

I'm no fan of any of these but saying bands like Oasis and The Smashing pumpkins had no cultural impact is ridiculous.

>>71552352
>>71553047
Nothing some people just want to fit in

>>71561139
>Last 7 years
>Posts 90s and 00s bands


I know you're trolling senpai but still

>>71561190
All three of those bands just put out albums over the last 7 years. Nice try though

>>71561054
NIN? Or rather, Trent Reznor.

>>71561202
When i said last 7 years i meant new bands. Maybe i wasn't clear enough, btw non of those bands brought anything new to the table in the 10s though maybe radiohead got close. Rock is still dead senpai i mean you had to cheat and name old bands to even tey to answer the question. Being in denial doesn't help yo. I wanna bring rock back people being in denial ain't helping shit.

>>71561275
>When i said last 7 years i meant new bands
Nice backpedaling
>btw non of those bands brought anything new to the table in the 10s though
Nice goalpost shifting
>Rock is still dead
It literally cannot be if there's new music being made.

>>71557799
>>71560212

By all means...why?

>>71561054
Why are you posting this every single day?

File: Hulton-Archive-Stringer.jpg (37KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 630x420px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71561275
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/12/the-20-best-new-bands-of-2016.html

Literally the second result in a simple google search you dummy

>>71561284
Idk if your doing this for the sake of it or trolling or whatever. But when something fails to innovative to change or to stay relevant people are going to say that shit is dead.

I mean if you were right you'd be able to list a shit ton of new bands that the press hyped that live up to that hype, I'd be btfo. You ain't got shit.

>>71557656
Was it any good, or was it just a 24 hour jam? Because I'm pretty sure drawn out post-rock wank had been done before.

File: The-Bee-Gees-010.jpg (38KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 460x276px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71561376
See >>71557808

>>71561403
Listen to it and find out.

File: ST.png (1MB, 1410x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1410x1000px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
>>71560686
Pretty much all of these WERE the old school rock n rollers.

>>71561344
m8 i can find you a list like that from 2011 and non of Those bands would have gone anywhere. These up and coming lists are total bs.

>>71561438
>non of Those bands would have gone anywhere
Who cares?

>>71561423
m8 you clearly have no argument, discard your shitty opinion. Rock ain't changed its become stale maybe one day musicians will see this and rock will be back. But for now its pretty much dead.

File: og1.jpg (24KB, 544x300px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 544x300px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71561498
>m8 you clearly have no argument
You mean I haven't backpedaled and goalpost shifted like you?
>discard your shitty opinion
You mean like "It only matters if the music press says so"?
>Rock ain't changed its become stale
See >>71560877

>>71561445
Your trying to argue that rock isn't dead. If new bands aren't becoming successful/well known then the music they play has lost its relevancy.

>>71561535
Dude i pretty much only liaten to rock fyi. I know what i meant when i first made my argument i haven't backpedaled shit. I mean your completely unable to name relevant new bands from this decade if you can't do that i ain't taking you seriously. Again it seems as if you ain't got shit.

>>71561545
>relevancy
Who cares?

The problem is that you rely on concepts that really are not relevant in rock music, that only apply to trend hoppers and are invented by the media. Maybe it's a concern in your shitty electronic and hip hop genres, but we don't care about the image or success. What matters is the emotion communicated. Concepts like
>mah relevancy
>mah innovation
>mah media hype
are irrelevant. Try coming up with an argument without them.

File: elo-Hulton-Archive-getty.jpg (41KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 630x420px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: devo-be-stiff.jpg (416KB, 1920x1152px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1920x1152px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
I'm not even done yet, by the way.

>>71561596
>Dude i pretty much only liaten to rock fyi.
Like what?
>I know what i meant when i first made my argument i haven't backpedaled shit
Your rubric was simply "duude just kick ass great music!", that is so ambiguous and subjective, it can literally be anything.
>I mean your completely unable to name relevant
See >>71561600
>new bands
I can name them all day. But you keep changing your rubric from "great" to "relevant". Are you listener to music because you want to like it, or because you want to fit in with a crowd? Answer honestly.

Is it really even a problem if music is derivative as long as it sounds good is the real question.

File: MI0001331035.jpg (23KB, 400x506px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x506px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: BonJovi.jpg (35KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 630x420px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
I've got more on the way, believe me!

File: photo.jpg (21KB, 274x274px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 274x274px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71561600
>>71561646
Innovation is very fucking important, most bands these days sound the same. Why should i listen to any other shitty band that sounds just like swim deep or pama violets? Rock is so boring right now because all these bands sound thw fucking same. I mean there arw modern bands i like fat white family and girl band for an example, but they unfortunately don't get much interest.

I think you've gotten what I'm saying completely wrong I'm not arguing against rock as a genre or saying that muh edm and rap is so much better.

For whatever reason bands theae days don't make completely mind blowing kick ass music. Like thw first time i listed to the stooges i was like holy fucking shit. No modern band seems to be able to do this. So the media hypes shitty bands like 21 pilots and the 1975 and thats what people see as modern popular rock. So people lose interest and then the genre loses relevance and that my friend is why not just me but many others say rock is dead. Maybe you'll disagree but can you not atleast see there is something terribly wrong?

>>71552352
they were popular, which is considered bad

File: cloud.png (251KB, 620x475px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 620x475px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
Not even close to finished.

>>71553047
unlike every other type of music rock is not allow to move foward or evolve otherwise rock purists bitch and whine that its not "real" rock music

>>71561054
Stone temple pilots. Finally i can think of a band that defeats this shitty pasta.

File: rs-245886-RS-The-Cure.jpg (76KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1200x630px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71561818
>mah relevancy
>mah innovation
>mah media hype
We alr4eday covered this.

Make an argument without either of those three and we'll talk. I could tell you the real problem, but you're just trolling at this point, you don't actually care

File: SIP-the-smiths-06.jpg (60KB, 800x529px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 800x529px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
We're at 18 now, folks!

File: dead-or-alive-band.jpg (34KB, 800x417px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x417px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
Top left is mfw.

File: p01bqhd3.jpg (87KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 960x540px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: p01bqj4q.jpg (81KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 960x540px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
21!

>>71561915
Look i know this board is autistic but there is no need to take your autism to the next level like this. Your almost as pleasant as brick wall conversation wise. My basic argument is that the music isn't as goodas it was. I mean relevancy and innovative are still important and you give no reason as to why that isn't the case. But if we are to be reductionist simpletons, the music isn't as good as it used to be.

Now tell me what you think the problem is then. Even though earlier you were saying rock isn't dead and there is no problem?

>>71561818
i read a magazine in a store just a day ortwo ago and it said just that
in 2017 what and who will save rock or is it dead

>>71562040
>>71562065
Pls stop bumping this shitty thread. You poor sad sad thing with nothing to live for.

>>71562071
>My basic argument is that the music isn't as goodas it was
This is wrong
>I mean relevancy and innovative are still important
Relevancy = popularity, not relevant
innovation = something that subjective and thus not important
>you give no reason as to why that isn't the case
Oh you didn't read the thread?
>Now tell me what you think the problem is then.
No, you don't want a conversation
>Even though earlier you were saying rock isn't dead and there is no problem?
Correct, that's not the problem

File: 49bcb879.jpg (72KB, 790x395px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 790x395px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: depeche-mode.jpg (132KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x1024px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>>71562104
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

>>71562088
Oh yeah, me to 21 pilots and tame impla are the future of rock n roll. They are so cool and nothing is wrong at all. Rocknrool 4eva duddes.

>>71562136
You're just trolling at this point.

File: legacy-4.jpg (23KB, 475x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 475x300px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys

File: 0000338319.jpg (55KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x500px

>>71558254
>>71558463
>>71560232
>>71560325
>>71560448
>>71560686
>rock was always masculine and played by buff masculine guys
I think 25 is a good number to close off on, don't you?

>>71562111
You seem like such a cool dude. Not uptight or annoying at all. Really though just post some fucking songs. Like you've spent this much time to prove your point. You haven't, mentioned any bands or posted any songs. I mean you really fucking think i want to believe rock is dead? I'm not attached to my opinions like everyone else here, desu I'd love to be proven wrong desu. All you need to do is post some fucking songs.

So far you've had nothing you've just stated your opinions over and over. Just post some fucking songs alright.

Who cares if rock dies? It's just another embarrassing footnote in the history of music, like smooth jazz or Rococo.

>>71561818
>No modern band seems to be able to do this.
because you don't listen to enough music

>>71562191
Imagine Dragons fan detected.

>>71562244
>You seem like such a cool dude.
Thanks
>Not uptight or annoying at all
I know, right?
>Really though just post some fucking songs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5RrWCRsSYA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oTw6n-rHJw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVoOcC5qu0s

>>71562257
Name some bands then faggot. Post a song thay blew your mind and maybe mine. I'm not a judgemental cunt like everyone else here. I'm not gonna mock your taste or claim mines better.

Now post ITT.

>>71562296
Ahhh you shitty little troll. I wanna hear some new bands not /mu/core. You know I've heard this shit before. You niggas ain't got shit.

>>71562333
>>71561344

>>71553047
Mass manufacturing. There simply aren't enough good melodies or chord combinations left for the average joe to make decent rock music.

>>71562385
I can't play giutar and i can barely sing. But this shit has driven me mad enough. I'm gonna start a band I'm gonna try to kick ass and be rocks last swan song. I mean even if i got no chance I'm gonna try cause fuck this shit and fuck you.

>>71562460
I play in 4 different bands, so good luck. You'll find some great local acts to play with, I'm sure. The last great band I heard that blew me away, I played with them.

>>71562460
Same. The world needs more prog rock.

>>71562479
Well I'm gonna name a song shitfuck just for you. You ever hear a song called shit fuck then you'll know its who.


It'll be me,

>>71562554
I don't care

>>71561054
i asked this the last time you made a thread about this and i didnt get an answer

why is it a problem that no critically acclaimed rock band in recent years has also been culturally relevant? yea youre right, no critically acclaimed band has also been culturally relevant since nirvana. whats the issue??

What can make rock music popular again?

>>71562709
Why would you care if it's popular or not?

>>71562574
Shitfuck yo you'll fuckin remember that

>2days later anon forgets, but drops something heavy on foot scream shitfuck. And then remembers.

File: image.jpg (27KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 320x240px

>>71555538

>>71562716
People here ITT are claiming that rock is dead and I tend to see that everywhere online so I was wondering if any of them have answer.

>>71562771
You didn't answer my question.

>>71562966
Whether or not rock music is popular is irrelevant to me.

I figured my post would have indicated that but I guess I was wrong.