Covers that cause you pain every time you're reminded of

File: 1468521381434.gif (509KB, 310x310px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 310x310px

>>71456028
>there are people that think this is better than the original

>>71456028
it sounds like a christmas carol, the chords are wrong and its way too slow

protip: the original version of sounds of silence (not the one with the overdubs) was mastered extremely clean, whoever did the now-famous overdub version used a shitty low-quality version making the whole thing distorted and muddy

listen to the original and how clean it is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zLfCnGVeL4

then listen to the overdub version, and all the noise and tape fuzz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgbBLKet14E

every cover Metallica ever did

their version of Whiskey in the Jar is terrible but their attempt at covering Anti-Nowhere League is more embarrassing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XoyDqFy5pU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6MlrPESdDI

how do you fuck a song that basic up? even a garage band of 14 year olds could cover So What better with less cringe

File: 606c5ceb66e3471b2385104f65b40efa.500x500x1 (1).jpg (69KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x500px

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXYIxJScSik

>>71456105
>I never knew this even existed

thank you anon

https://youtu.be/stgrSjynPKs

Johnny Cash would be rolling in his grave right now if he heard this

>>71457678

Someone explain to me again how the fuck this retard got on the best R&B album of the last decade

>>71456028
good
>>71456254
whiskey in a jar isn't that bad
>>71456712
not that bad except the intro
>>71457678
legitimately awful, good job

o shit i thought this was about album covers

>>71456028
Agreed, the 1965 cover of the acoustic original is garbage