Post a group of albums that you would consider to be the "best",

File: GOATS.png (321KB, 458x307px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 458x307px

>>71439783
Never got the love for Joanna. Pet Sounds, Blonde On Blonde and the Gojira album (can't remember the name now) are excellent. Loveless and Aja are pretty good.

>>71439783
You do realize how hilariously naive you sound making lists like these? Without mentioning classical music, or even jazz?

Read more if you want to be "objective", you insecure fag

>>71439924
Aja is jazz though.

File: FuckOff.jpg (11KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 450x300px

>>71439783
>objective

>>71439946
I don't want to be a dick to you, but please don't say that ever again.

File: 1484414270283.jpg (61KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1000x800px

Op here. Before everyone gets triggered over the use of the word "objective" please note I just said to TRY to be as objective as possible. Obviously it's an impossible idea but it's something you can strive for and attempt to achieve by changing the way you think about albums, even if you will always come up short of true objectivity (if such a thing could even be said to exist).

>>71439972
Well, it is more rock (and pop) than jazz tbqh.

File: 510a191f56ac65847d87feb536467825.jpg (348KB, 495x330px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 495x330px

im not even joking, these are my top favorite albums objectively, thought about it for 10 minutes

>Art of Fugue
>9th
>Beethoven's late string quartets
>Can's Future Days
>Kind Of Blue

I'd probably throw in a bunch of blues/folk into it too

>>71439924
No.

>>71439999
dude lsd lmao

(those some of my favorites too) (checked)

>>71439999
> my top favorite albums objectively

>>71439999
why quads why

>>71439999
>my top favorite albums
>objectively
What does that even means?

File: OBJECTIVE!!!.jpg (401KB, 609x490px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 609x490px

OkiDoker boyz I hope U lick ym objetcvittivy.

>>71439992
Right, the only thing that it shares with jazz are some guitar chords

>>71440025
I hope you do now

File: topsters2 (34).png (310KB, 1064x1064px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1064x1064px

>>71439999
eh, i wouldn't call sung tongs objectively good, with whaddit i done and visiting friends (even though i like those songs)

these are the albums i would consider objectively good, from a music theory standpoint

>>71440271
Holy shit that's bad

>>71440344
How can something be "better" or "worse" from a "music theory standpoint"? Music theory says nothing about the relative quality of a piece of music, unless you're saying complexity=quality.

File: armyliam.jpg (33KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 240x240px

>>71440625
>Pulp

A N G E R Y

>>71440665
literally please just fuck off liam

File: gallagher borthers laughing.jpg (92KB, 618x521px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 618x521px

>>71440681
This is rich coming from the man who thinks Pulp ever made anything that can even compete with Oasis' first 4 albums whatsoever.

>>71440738
please Gallagher brothers just fucking leave me alone

File: sad noel 1.jpg (28KB, 636x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 636x300px

>>71440752