>he never rates an album anything less than a 6 out of 10

this post is pretty bad. I rate it a 6 out of 10

>>71408116
Why would you listen to an album that is less than a 6 out of 10?

>>71408116
Because perhaps they don't bother listening to albums that deserve lower than 6/10.

File: image.jpg (30KB, 435x290px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 435x290px

>>71408116
>he rates his music
There's nothing more autistic than assigning numerical values to things you listen to.

>>71408143
how would you know before listening to it?

>>71408143
>>71408162
mun online review plebs

I generally like most music so I tend to informally rate everything 7/10. 6/10 if it's actually just ok. Informally because I don't have a RYM

>>71408181
Online reviews are benchmarks. Sorry you prefer sifting through shitty Bandcamp music.

>>71408116
Bevause I rarely bother listening to mediocre music

>>71408116
Because everything is at least a little good desu

>>71408138
>>71408143
>>71408162
check out this profile and tell me he isn't a poseur who pretends to be into all kinds of music xD

http://www.albumoftheyear.org/user/sourcherry24/

>>71408116
>ratings go from 3.5 to 5.0
EVERY metalfag

>>71408176
this

I use rym, but mostly as a means of organizing and recording what I've listened to. My opinion changes a lot on ratings and I don't really take them too seriously unless they're rreally good or really bad.

>>71408293
wrong

>>71408268
so you don't discover new music?

>>71408293
very wrong