They were getting darker and more esoteric in their sound and

Well they posers from day one so they just continued posing.
People talk about "style shifts" as if it's a good thing to completely change your persona and outlook about 5 times in the space of 5 years.
These guys are fucking terrible.

>2011
>Wakes up
>"I think I'm gonna be trippy dude, like the doors n shit" queens of the stone age man woo acid dude
>2012
>Wakes up
>"Hey you know today I think I'm gonna grow a quiff and impersonate Elvis, ya dig?"

>>71335324
When did they start working with Homme?

>>71335475
I mean their progression up to that point felt organic and logical, their sudden change is what makes me wonder
Also
>doors and qotsa
Have you evenlistentened to the first albums? They are totally oasis and stone roses inspired

>>71336163
I listened to them about a week after they came out in stores, you autist. Would I be commenting in this thread if I hadn't heard them?

They're a shit band, trying to maintain relevancy by jumping from one image to the next.

>Arctic Monkeys first albums
>Sounding anything like the roses or Oasis
lol you what

>>71336163
Nigga what? Arctic monkeys first albums are way more out there and less accessible than oasis and stone roses alternative dad buttrock.

>>71336274
Wrong

The first two Arctic Monkeys albums weren't out there at all. They were heavily influenced by the Strokes and wrote songs about going to pubs.

You must be american if you believe this means they were "out there" lmao

>>71336274
>Stone Roses
>Oasis
>dad Buttrock
Choose one

>>71336321
They're kinda out there for a pop-rock band. The lyrical content maybe not so much, but sonically it's a lot more interesting than oasis and stone roses shit.
>>71336344
That's why I included alternative

>>71336274
>artic monkeys
>out there
>esoteric

nigga

>>71336406
>Artctic Monkeys more interesting sonically than The Stone Roses

You are fucking deluded