why can't computers write better music than humans yet

No, it's not. If there was a methodical approach to making music it would have been solved by computers decades ago.

>>71330409
>I'm a complete fucking idiot and I have no idea what I'm talking about

was hoping to have an intellectual conversation, not get some random retard in my thread

fuck off dude

>implying computers will ever understand tastes that are inherently contrarian

The amount of context it takes for someone to understand Captain Memeheart is outside of computers atm.

>>71330454
Jesus Christ dude.

He wasn't even wrong you dumb cunt

I'll give it 4 years.

Computers already analyze what music-purchasers want.

They tried to make a mathematically perfect song a couple years back and it was trash

It becomes too predictable and bubblegum and "I've heard this before" at that point. Good art is unique, edgy etc, and they haven't really got a mathematical way to write meaningful lyrics, which is something a lot of people look to in songs

>>71330409
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_music

>>71330302
why the fuck did they use capitol pi in Euler's identity? Makes it look like a product over i or some shit.

>>71330576
/thread

>>71330680
Generative music is neat but it's not very good.

I was more referring to that if there was a methodical approach you could take to make original songs with no extra input, it would have been done forever ago?

>>71330896
That question wasn't supposed to end with a question mark.