FACT: the 2000s were an amazing time for pop music but the worst

>>71208206
>the worst decade for electronic music
please elaborate

>>71208206
I know what you want for a reply OP, and no, I'm not giving it to you.

>>71208241
actually I don't know

>>71208274
>Lying on the internet
it's NOT ok

>>71208241
It's OK because I will.
>crackers
>spice
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

90's and early 2000's pop is horrible
80's and 2010's are solid
70's pop is the shit

I can't fucking stand 2000's pop. 10's pop seems to me to be 00's pop but with some fucking dynamics and breadth.

>>71208206
but OP, Drukqs came out in the 2000's

File: 1487662682719.png (750KB, 993x638px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 993x638px

>>71208206
2000-2006 was awesome
2006-2009 sucked

>>71208206
Indietronica was ok.

I love the 2000s for trance, so no.

>>71210269
This guy again