>320kbps >320kbps >320kbps >320kbps >320kbps >192kbps

better than no 320 at all

>>70847540
I don't trust the other ones are actually 320 if they're inconsistent

File: 4c7f2afd4dd1d76a7dd20cb22c64c46f6dd718117074b49e51a53f020e18edce.png (581KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 640x480px

>>70847467
>mfw artists official release is like this

File: 24.png (28KB, 194x295px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 194x295px

>cover.jpg
>front.jpg
>album.jpg

>>70847629
Who, when, why?

>>70847695
just uncheck those things you dummy

>>70847695
When did this happen? I used to do this on old shitpost albums.

>>70847699
soundcloud artists. i've even got one album titled
>2013 - Stay Pure EP [128 256 320 MP3]
it has 7 tracks. and 3 different bitrates. i understand not releasing in flac because they're retarded but this is just too much

File: 1407712083722.png (210KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 495x495px

>read me. txt

File: 25.png (43KB, 302x169px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 302x169px

>files are tagged with an alt cover

File: 1484856664654.jpg (53KB, 960x957px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 960x957px

>>70847467
>MP3s

>>70847819
>1. [track name]
>2. [track name]
>3. [track name]
>4. [track name]
>5. [track name]
>6. [track name]
>7. [track name]
>8. [track name]

IF IT'S FUCKING TAGGED WHY IS THE NUMBER IN THE SONG NAME

>>70847869
so it's in order in file view, my dude. i use disk numbers too

>>70847893
this
and some cheap mp3 players don't sort songs by tags, but by filenames. it's annoying as hell

File: Capture.png (37KB, 177x175px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 177x175px

>bandcamp shilling in the comment tag

File: 1483936996355.jpg (10KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 351x351px

>>70847925
DAT PIFF DOT COM
DAT PIFF DOT COM
DAT PIFF DOT COM
DAT PIFF DOT COM

File: post-19715-Brent-Rambo-gif-thumbs-up-imgu-L3yP.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>tags are filled out correctly
>folder structure how I like it
>no transcodes

File: 1484772760657.jpg (99KB, 448x537px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 448x537px

>319kbps
>316kbps
>319kbps
>317kbps
>319kbps
>318kbps
>317kbps
>319kbps
>319kbps
>319kbps
>319kbps
>319kbps

File: 1446441281741.jpg (21KB, 448x545px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 448x545px

>>70848039
>tags are so fucked up the songs are separated into 5 different albums in your music player

Fuck people who do this

>>70848208
This seriously does me

File: kysmm.jpg (36KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x500px

>It looks like you're not sharing any files. Please share something before downloading anything from my own shares. Thanks.

File: 13.png (76KB, 307x216px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 307x216px

>>70848208
holy fuck this

>download hip-hop album
>artist tag is different for every song with features

File: IMG_1763.jpg (70KB, 629x588px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 629x588px

>Artist
>Artist
>Artist & Featured Artist
>Artist
>Artist & Featured Artist
>Artist
>Remix Artist

>download discography
>almst nothing is tagged, and if it's tagged, it's crudely wrong
fuck you whoever uploaded that spinetta discography

>MACOSX.-

File: 1475114911814.png (126KB, 402x398px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 402x398px

>>70847695
>folder.jpg

File: 26.png (70KB, 202x283px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 202x283px

>not tagged properly for multiple discs
>track 1
>track 1
>track 1
>track 2
>track 2
>track 2

>>70847695
>album_art_small.jpg
>album_art_large.jpg
>cd.jpg
>back.jpg
>cover.jpg
>several random pictures of the artist
>all in the same file

>>70848288
>Hip Hop
>Hip-Hop
>Hip Hop / Rap
>Rap
>Hip-Hop / Rap

>only one track is tagged with cover art

>>70848634
>entire album isn't tagged with cover art
it hurts

File: enough.jpg (32KB, 425x322px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 425x322px

>No lyrics found

File: 1436491020552.jpg (106KB, 355x495px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 355x495px

>Genre: Alternative

>no cover art included but 10 .jpgs advertising the guy's site
You know who you are.

>cover_large.jpg
>it's 80x80 px

>album name tag (2017) Artist name - album [BESTTORRENT123]
>artist tag <unknown>

File: Capture.png (157KB, 446x324px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 446x324px

>files are tagged with tiny image

File: 1479096994235.jpg (18KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 320x320px

>.DS_Store

>>70848700

>Genre: Other

If an album is released as a collab between 2 artists, should the artist tag be Artist1 x Artist2? Same with the folder name?

>>70848838
>Genre: 131

File: catroomguardian.jpg (35KB, 600x564px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x564px

>skit is replaced with Jerry Seinfeld stand-up

File: improvised music from japan.jpg (12KB, 227x227px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 227x227px

>>70848502
That's the worst of all. I remember when I downloaded the album in pic, and I had to manually assign all 10 discs. Pure hell.

File: 1484369365232.jpg (232KB, 600x459px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 600x459px

>instead of files being 01 [track name] it's bullshit like [artist name] - [album name] - ## - [track name] and it's usually in all lowercase without the correct name
>gives different artist and album artist
>doesn't put year
>puts inconsistent album names based on disc

>>70848782
Those are hidden for Mac users. They don't take much space, but I can see how it could be annoying for PC users.

File: 1379285834179.jpg (201KB, 1020x1125px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1020x1125px

>>70848700
>Genre: Rock

File: Untitled.png (298KB, 751x323px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 751x323px

>>70847467
>download album from an official source that I bought it from because I'm a loser that still pays for music
>several of the tracks are listed under their own separate album for no reason

>>70847796
Why do you waste time listening to amateur musicians when there is almost certainly thousands of highly acclaimed artists you haven't heard?

>>70849253
Because you don't need to be a pro to be good

>>70847893
..You do realize you can order them by the tagged track numbers too? not just filenames.

File: 1484394588413.jpg (111KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1252x1252px

>cover.exe

File: 19938962111464567869.jpg (26KB, 220x277px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 220x277px

>MY FELLOW AMERICANS

>>70848208
>had to dump a faust album because of this and I could only find it one place else and it was a lower quality
fuck this shit really

>>70849253
A good counter-example to this argument is (in my opinion) Lil Ugly Mane/Travis Miller. Third Side of Tape is definitely not a high-profile release, and it's a goddamn masterpiece.

File: 1472023331236.jpg (78KB, 444x460px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 444x460px

>[Artist] - [Artist - Track Title]

File: 1447711448133.jpg (47KB, 667x645px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 667x645px

>192kbps
>192kbps
>192kbps
>80kbps
>192kbps
>128kbps
>128kbps
>192kbps
>192kbps
>128kbps
>128kbps
>128kbps
>192kbps

File: 1461871374425.jpg (94KB, 800x670px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x670px

>>70848288
>>70848208
>>70848782
>>70849417
>>70847869
>>70847966

THESE FUCKING BOIL MY PISS

>Artist - Album (9)
>Artist - [1976, 1976] Album (1)

File: tmp_18233-1485359343831-1283086474.jpg (430KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 600x800px

>vinyl rip

>>70849506
>>80kbps
we're reaching levels of garbage that shouldn't even be possible

>>70848288
>>70848208
How do you fix these on Android? My CD rips of Illmatic and MBDTF do this.

>>70850230
you need a music player app with tag editing, or a tag editing app (not sure of any specifically, but i know shuttle has a tag editor)

>>70848208
itunes is pretty good for such problems and it always helped me

>>70850242
Black Player kinda does this but then >>70848580
happens.

File: 2.jpg (71KB, 1300x975px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1300x975px

>Genre: Weird Rock

File: 1474766290305.jpg (235KB, 1077x944px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1077x944px

>want 256 or 192 to save space
>it's only in 320

>tracks are bind together into a single flac file
*Autistic screetching intensified*

File: 1469456436797.jpg (37KB, 487x720px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 487x720px

>Folder/Music/Itunes/Artist/Album
>Downloading thinking it's good quality
>Listening to the album
>Some of the songs have scratching sounds and jumps back and forth
>Deleting it but knowing the shitstain that shared it is sharing it to others as well

>Artist ft Artist
>Artist feat. artist
>artist (ft) artist
>Artist (ft. Artist)
>Artist -ft- Artist
>06 Artist

>>70849506

I've seen some 42kbps files, I almost downloaded them out of pure curiosity

>>70849372
Tag it yourself retard

>>70849253
>it's popular so it must be good

File: 1468520696441.jpg (6KB, 261x155px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 261x155px

>Genre: Pop
>album artist - album title - track number - song title year of album release

>>70850476
In a share thread somebody uploaded a Linkin Park album at 42kbps it sounded like I remember songs sounding when I recorded them off my laptop speakers with my flip phone's microphone back in 2006

File: 1466043113059.jpg (54KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x375px

>>70850864

>>70850864
those were dark times we lived in friend

>Sort by track number
>6,3,4,5,1,2

>>70850864
i want this

>>70851176
>sort by track number
>1
>11
>12
>2
>3

File: auuahgaihgahg.png (94KB, 285x220px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 285x220px

Genre: Blues

>>70848236
>not sharing anything
no u

File: 1485050978993.png (696KB, 604x522px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 604x522px

>the artist lost the master so even the 12in is just 192 kbps files on vinyl

File: meh.ro4452.png (549KB, 569x412px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 569x412px

I have way too many of these

>Year listed as the year when it was reissued
>"album artist" is same as artist, but with an "&" instead of "and" or something stupid.
>"Album Title deluxe edition year other random shit"
>absolutely no capitalization

I once downloaded a Guided By Voices discography with absolutely zero tagging, all the songs were piled together and I had to use rym to figure out what songs belonged on what album. That's 2 hours of my life I want back.

>AlbumArt_Large
>AlbumArt_Small
Both are 200x200

>>70847467
>not on pth and apl
come on /mu/

File: 1462206350717.jpg (56KB, 500x506px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x506px

>>70847467
>FLAC
>FLAC
>FLAC
>FLAC
>FLAC
>thumb.jpg
>open in spectro
>It's all bogus recoded lossy shit

>>70848236

How ironic

Not sure what you're memeing about. Sometimes a vinyl rip is the only way to get a digital version that isn't brick walled to shit, if it's one of those releases where the CD is loudness wars garbage but the LP got it's own mix.

>download album
>"CD quality rip"
>it's an iso of the CD
>mfw

>>70852029
well, it's not wrong

File: 1473463225358.png (670KB, 2008x1506px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 2008x1506px

>dance compilation
>each producer's track is tagged under their names and you have to manually go through all of them

>tfw enjoy tagging your music
>tfw neet so offered to tag and sort online friends music for $1/hr
>tfw they felt too bad about exploiting you to go through with it
Sad

>>70849203
>not selecting show hidden files always

This whole thread is triggering me I need a safe space Jeff goldblum plus hold me

File: 632092043ad50c112f94b25d802c0198.jpg (25KB, 680x383px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 680x383px

>comment tag has adjectives describing the album
>beautiful
>genius
>masterpiece

File: Capture.png (7KB, 425x292px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 425x292px

>>70852851
o shit, just noticed that every song has different adjectives and also different genres

what is this autusm

File: 1481408976348.jpg (82KB, 600x759px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 600x759px

>Remastered album
>Date listed is of the remaster

>album is properly identical tag-wise
>for some reason it appears as two separate identical albums on phone with each one having more or less half the album
WHY

>>70853108
fucking this, itunes usually fucks me over with this

>You agonize over all of these issues
>Your personal collection is, at great effort from yourself, tagged perfectly
>People would fight for your extensive library
>One day your favourite DAP simply stops reading tags
>This somehow syncs back to your main system and deletes all ID3 tags

WELL, I GUESS IT'S TIME TO DIE

Fucking retard frog poster.

>>70850614
>>70849340
>>70848782
>>70848449
>>70847818
>>70847467

>>70851216
That's why you do 01, 02, 03, and then 11, 12, and 13. (not trying to be rude, not sure if you don;t know how to fix this or not)

>>70853121
I usually have to just put a space after artist name so the album saves under a different artist, then do that for the entire discography, takes like 20 mins.

Although one time I couldn't figure out why it didnt get fixed and it was because I had Suicdal Tendencies and Suicidal Tendencies

>>70849253
This is bait

File: 1486233768226.png (19KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 499x499px

>>70853317
>implying this is one person

>>70853121
Select both albums and check "part of compilation" and they will merge together. Then uncheck "part of compilation" on the now single album and it will remain one album. Has worked for me everytime

File: IMG_1109.jpg (16KB, 364x301px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 364x301px

>>70848208
>tags are so fucked up that every song is in a separate album in your music player

>>70848236

just share 2 albums nobody gives a shit about

problem solved

Is this really a thread of entitled millennials complaining about stealing music?

File: Embarrassing.png (265KB, 334x393px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 334x393px

>>70855304
>not a millennial
>still on 4chan

>>70855304
fripp pls go

>autistic concern over tags
>unable to utilize basic tagging software

pick one

File: IMG_0374.jpg (5KB, 78x182px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 78x182px

.3gp

>Download song based on obscure youtube clip because it sounded funky as fuck
>It turns out to be prog rock
>It's tagged as "New Age"
>still breddy gud but goddamn

>>70855304
you're most likely a millennial yourself.
>demographers and researchers typically use the early 1980s as starting birth years and ending birth years ranging from the mid-1990s to early 2000s

>>70849253
You cannot possibly encounter all music that is extant, so your argument is moot.

Like all things in life, search only until you find what is good for you and stay as long as it is good; only move when you are no longer satisfied.