Why does /mu/ resort to aesthetic relativism to excuse its shitty

>>70673110
liking Bach doesn't make you a patrician. I doubt you understand what a tonal answer or even a tonic/dominant splice is.

>>70673221
I understand ur a bitch

>>70673242
>complains about resorting to aesthetic relativism
>resorts to memes
trash

>>70673110
I also watch exclusively cuck porn.

Bach doesnt even have a single bnm

>>70673110
I listen to music for two reasons: 1) I enjoy it, and 2) I feel like it has something important to tell me.

>>70673110
>excuse its shitty taste
>implying taste needs to be excused in any way

because we know for a fact different people like different genres for different reasons, other cultures developed different tuning systems, etc, so it makes the most sense to conclude it's relatively relative

>>70673260
aesthetic relativism is a meme.

>>70673370
Well done, you resorted to aesthetic relativism.

Retard.

>>70673938
i know i did, retard. but not as an "excuse"

>>70673909
>>70673938
you are a meme

>>70673954
No, it was totally an excuse. You did exactly what OP was talking about without any argument to the contrary.

All you did was poorly define aesthetic relativism to no effect.

>>70673110
daily reminder that only parroting teenage memeheads choose bach over masters like palestrina and beethoven

>>70674818
daily reminder that romanticism is cancer

>>70674829
Beethoven is emphatically NOT a romantic composer

>>70674841
he's the ungodly savage that spawned it

go jerk off to some chopin faggot

>>70674852
It's not his fault that retards took the Pastoral too far

>>70674858
They didn't take it far enough.

>>70674866
Liszt pls go

Why do people jerk off classical and baroque composers? Is it just because that's all teenager memers know?

>>70674885
Yes. Musicologists say that the Bach Passions are the greatest works of all time which leads to idiots parroting that opinion, no different to /mu/ kiddies """claiming""" that they truly understand TMR just because one Italian pedophile says he likes it.

>>70674885
Because romanticism is cancer.

>>70674972
what about impressionism? totalism? minimalism? Neo-classicism? serialism?

>>70674992
all cancer save for serialism

good luck disproving aeshetic/moral/etc relativism mate. it's quite literally the truth

>>70675094
lmfao you sound so boring

>>70675260
>the only interesting people are people who have my taste

lmfao you sound so conceited

>>70675120
>the truth is there is no truth

paradoxical and edgy, are you a nihilist with a wicked sense of humour?

It's their ego, OP. They all want to believe their taste is special and unique even if it's pleb as fuck, so they over-analyze glorified pop songs in an attempt to look intelligent.