>Revolutionized Rock music >Ahead of their time >Making

u mad bro?

>>70290836
They were pretty good songwriters though

The fact that

>>70290836
But they wrote good pop tunes and that's all really matters.

>>70290836
god theyre so handsome

>>70290904
cheerleader effect

>this is better than anything the beatles ever did
lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmW17QvUhRM

>>70290904
>>>>Ringo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Handsome

File: tumblr_lm0o7hG2ch1qiihmb.jpg (103KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 400x600px

>>70290943
implying you wouldnt

File: radiohead.jpg (73KB, 945x591px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 945x591px

>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of their time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of their comfort zone and experiment

>>70290836
>Revolutionized Rock music
How? They started as a cute boy band, which is hardly rock music. They revolutionized a way of making as much money as possible from music.
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
Frank Zappa, Captain Beefheart, The Residents, The Velvet Underground, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Soft Machine, Can, Neu! - just to name a few.
https://youtu.be/KZazEM8cgt0

>>70291000
>reading comprehension

>>70291000
these trips have been wasted on your inability to read a whole fucking post

>>70290836
>>Revolutionized Rock music
>>Ahead of their time
>>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>>Was able to get out of their comfort zone and experiment
>These are all things that The Beatles DIDN'T do.
How old are you? Late teens/early 20s, I would guess, and you still haven't listened to Tomorrow Never Knows?

>>70291000
They invented heavy metal.

File: 43546457687567.jpg (957KB, 1332x749px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 1332x749px

>>70290988

>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment

>>70291009
>>70291013
Sigh... I see now. I'm just so used to ridiculous bait threads that I'm almost sure what the threads contain, without reading. I was wrong this time and I'm glad.

>>70291053
I want to hurt him
I want to break his faggy guitar over his faggy head and watch him lie there
I know Will is behind this post anyways so watch your fucking back

File: IMG_1887.jpg (55KB, 339x510px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 339x510px

>>70291053
>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment

>>70291000
>>70291072
These post are Post reverse-b8.

>>70291103
All hail master Brötzmann!

File: Viper.jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x360px

>>70291103
>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment

File: 1471234251689.png (326KB, 412x490px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 412x490px

>>70291158
>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment
>CUTE

>>70291000
Ah, congrats. You've just turned 20, discovered poseur core and are in your "do u even Beefheart" phase.

Next you'll discover Pere Ubu. Heady days.

File: skull trumpet.jpg (7KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 480x360px

>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment

File: IMG_1246.jpg (52KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 420x420px

>>70291239
>>70291375
>Revolutionized Avant-Hop music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment

>>70291321
>Poseur core
Thanks for throwing in the nose for me and confirming that you're baiting.

>>70291321
Oh, and by the way, would you indulge us, the wise one, with your exquisite taste in music?

>>70290836
>These are all things that The Beatles DIDN'T do.
But they did Revolutionized Rock Music and Was able to get out of their comfort zone and experiment.

The other two, no.

File: The Rolling Stones.jpg (13KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x225px

>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of their time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of their comfort zone and experiment

>>70291845
>Tomorrow Never Knows is not ahead of its time

>>70291815
Merzbow, Boredoms, Gerogerigegege, Coil, Throbbing Gristle, Whitehouse, Nurse with Wound, Einstürzende Neubauten, Brainbombs, Egor Letov, Death in June, Current 93, La Monte Young, Moondog, Lou Harrison, Henry Cowell, Luigi Russolo, Popol Vuh, Fishmans, Jean Jacques Perrey, Les Rallizes Dénudés, Rainbow Caroliner, Taj Mahal Travellers, Fushitsusha, Peter Brötzmann, John Cage, Scott Walker, Unwound, Dead, Morton Feldman, Pharoah Sanders, Albert Ayler, Ornette Coleman, Alice Coltrane, Arnold Schoenberg, Pierre Boulez, György Ligeti, Nang Nang, Thinking Fellers Union Local 282, Nara Leão, Basic Channel, Raymond Scott, Delia Derbyshire, Daphne Oram, Noah Howard, Terry Riley, Peter Sotos, Lula Côrtes e Zé Ramalho, Boyd Rice, Mahmoud Ahmed, Henry Flynt, Kazumoto Endo, David Tudor, Aporea, Half Japanese, Mega Banton, Secret Chiefs 3, Keiji Haino, Ramleh, Otomo Yoshihide, John Zorn, Joe Meek, Robbie Basho, Phil Spector, Faxed Head, Harry Partch, Wesley Willis, Fred Frith, Sun Ra, Sun City Girls, Hans Krüsi, Royal Trux, Jandek, Yat-Kha, Loren Mazzacane Connors, Pärson Sound, The Dead C, Comus, Cromagnon, Eliane Radigue, Arthur Doyle, Shizuka, The Red Krayola, Henry Cow, Magma, Opus Avantra, Pan.Thy.Monium., Murmuüre, Ksiezyc, Gong, Cukor Bila Smert', cLOUDDEAD, Muslimgauze and Kaoru Abe

>>70291860
Great copypasta.
>>70177113
They're almost the same though.

>>70291853
Yeah I suppose that one is.

>>70291000
>Frank Zappa, Captain Beefheart, The Residents, The Velvet Underground, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Soft Machine, Can, Neu!
Most of these artists wouldn't dare make pop music.

Checkmate.

>>70290904
I thought the exact opposite, all of them are fucking ugly except for maybe that dude on the far right but his eyebrows & mouth are fucked.

File: PWLIALIL.png (857KB, 888x888px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 888x888px

>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of their time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of their comfort zone and experiment
even tho these all mean the same thing...

>>70291882
You could make the argument for Norwegian Wood, Helter Skelter, Strawberry Fields Forever, and a few others. As well as pioneering moments like one of the very first concept albums, first use of intentional feedback in a song (I Feel Fine), the first music video (Paperback Writer promo). I would say they were most definitely ahead of their time.

File: MAD ILLUSIONS.jpg (14KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x300px

>>70291931
>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of his time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of his comfort zone and experiment

>>70291877
seems like we have a similar taste

>>70291939
>You could make the argument for Norwegian Wood, Helter Skelter, Strawberry Fields Forever, and a few others
What did they do?
>As well as pioneering moments like one of the very first concept albums
Frank Sinatra and Woody Guthrie beat them to it.
>first use of intentional feedback in a song (I Feel Fine)
That was "Rumble" by Link Wray

File: image.jpg (136KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1280x853px

>Revolutionized Rock music
>Ahead of her time
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
>Was able to get out of her comfort zone and experiment
>Big tits fat ass

>>70291895
TVU literally made Pop Rock.

>>70290836
t. Pablo Scruffy

>>70291931
You're a moron. I'm sorry.

>>70291049
Anything of of TMR is most revolutionary than Tommorow Never Knows.

>>70291375
thank mr skeltal

File: solistenup.jpg (30KB, 555x644px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 555x644px

>>70290836
>Velvet Underground

>"They were a driving force in the Velvets, and made us work harder and got us on our bikes. Rubber Soul was where you were forced to deal with them as something other than a flash in the pan. It was rich in ideas and I loved the way George managed to find a way to include all those Indian instruments. Lou and I had tried to work with the sarinda. We were only playing it just to get a noise but I realized you could play melody on the sitar as good as Norwegian Wood. Norwegian Wood had this atmosphere of being very acid. I don’t think anybody has ever got that sound or that feeling as well as the Beatles."

- john cale

>Pink Floyd

>“When they made Sgt. Pepper in 67, we were in the same studio making our first record, and I remember when it came out and listening to the whole thing and just sitting there with my mouth hanging open going “Wow this is so complete and accomplished" and whatever but it was also more than that. It had a ton of ideas and a ton narrative in it, and I feel more than any other record it was the record that gave me, and my generation permission to branch out and do whatever we wanted. If they can do it, we can do it. It changed everything.”

- roger waters

no one cares about captain beefheart so i wont bother to see if he said anything about the beatles.

the beatles are the most important/influential pop/rock act of the 21st century, behind only perhaps bob dylan. sorry contrarians. no im not a beatle fag there have been much better songwriters but to deny their influence is stupid.

>>70292426
20th century* my bad

>>70292235
Following The Beatles lead

>>70292291
You mean just white guy blues with lolrandumb lyrics?

>>70292426
>no one cares about captain beefheart so i wont bother to see if he said anything about the beatles.
He didn't like them

>>70292879
For good reasons.

>>70290836
Wings were better than all of the bands you named.

>>70293841
Like what?

Remember he was a paranoid schizophrenic

>>70291931
starting to agree with this

File: spiderman.jpg (29KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x360px

Spiderman thread?

>>70290836
>keep being #1 on every greatest bands of all time list.
gotta wait for the baby boomers and gen x to die off before they drop in stature

Show me a rock song that sounded like Tomorrow Never Knows before 1966.

>>70295487
10 songs i can name

>>70295750
Go ahead. Has to be rock.

>>70290836
Something interesting to note is that when Beefheart, Zappa, and TVU tried to make more poppy stuff in the similar vein of The Beatles, they were HORRIBLE at it. Anyone can make an experimental work without much attempts at keeping structure like Beefheart, Zappa, TVU, Can, etc. Shit there are so many shitposters here that have their own "experimental musique concrete" project for example as well. But to put that into a poppy format? THAT takes skill. Skill that Beatles had above all these posers.

>>70290836
You're right OP
They DIDN'T revolutionize rock music.
They merely put a British spin or twist on already existing American rock and R&B

They WEREN'T ahead of their time.
They WERE however in the right place in the right time when a universal paradigm shift was taking place. Unless you were born in England during World War Two you can't have an understand on how or why The Beatles were important or what they meant both as people and as a band.

They DIDN'T make music that no other artist would dare to make.
There were already so many "Outsiders" in the business that when you compare the modern Jazz in so called "Avant Garde" music scene The Beatles were actually not only pretty tame but old hat. Grant you The Beatles were the first ROCK band to experiment with tape loops speeded up and backward recordings but other people did it before them.

And the NEVER left their comfort zone. Once they were rich and famous their comfort zone basically expanded to the point where they could do something like Revolution #9 and get away with it.

That being said.........
Safe as Milk was just a white boy blues album w/a white guy who could sing like a Chicago South Side black bluesman. The Velvet Underground simultaneously were the antithesis AND rip off of The Fugs and Pink Floyd basically were Jazz fans who basically borrowed from every rock band at the time and created their own sound. Shit parts of PATGOD sound like DONAVAN!

But that doesn't stop me from enjoying The Beatles' music.

Play Apples and Oranges back to back with Sgt Pepper. (The song not the entire album)

>>70291618
kill yourself

>>70295906
>they were HORRIBLE at it
>>>TVU as example
S/T and Loaded are amazing.

File: 82347273592.png (13KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 200x200px

>>70295906

>>70296330
Decent, passable, not amazing. And lets not forget Squeeze one of the worst albums ever.

>>70296376
In terms of rating how tough it is to make music

Generic cliche pop stuff<<<<<<dumb experimental gimmick trash<<<<<experimental that tries out new ideas<<<<<<<<<"art" music (variations on classical, jazz, and their ethnic variants)<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<pop music that has various subtleties in how its composed/produced

>>70296495
>. And lets not forget Squeeze one of the worst albums ever.
But that was just doug yule. I'm talking about the ones with actual original members.
But just the existence of S/T and Loaded Proves TVU are able to make legitimately good Pop Rock tunes anybody can enjoy.

>>70290836
>Pink Floyd

What the fuck did they do that was so experimental and no one would use would do?

>>70296625
1. Yule or not, TVU is TVU.

2. The other two barely pass for being ambitious pop as they are far more straightforward than just about everything Beatles did post-Rubber Soul.

>>70296661
When Piper came out it was the first of its kind doing the rock w/ heavy electronic effects beyond just cutting tape. Big influence on space rock, prog, krautrock, Radiohead on OKC, etc.

>>70296661
They had a bike:^)

>>70296161
>And the NEVER left their comfort zone. Once they were rich and famous their comfort zone basically expanded to the point where they could do something like Revolution #9 and get away with it.
If that was true, they'd just remake A Hard Days Night over and over again.

I know it's in 4chan culture to be contrarian because if you want popular opinions, most other websites cover it.

But the notion that here that the Beatles were anything less than the most influential musical group is just false.

All you have to do is read actual accounts by actual big name musicians. A staggering amount of people (some made it some didn't) either got into music properly, formed a band, or picked up an instrument after watching their '64 performance on the Ed Sullivan Show.

People like to think oh they were the best selling they couldn't have been artistically the best because that's never happened. Well it happened once with the Beatles.

File: the-beatles-circa-1966-650-430.jpg (49KB, 636x421px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 636x421px

If you could identify one single reason why they broke up, what would it be?

>>70290956
STOP!!!!!

AND TAKE THE TIME TO BUY THIS ALBUM!!!!

>>70297921
Running Apple Records.

They were musicians, not businessmen. Not only did they not know what they hell they were doing, but they'd have to still walk into the studio and make music with people they'd been yelling at in a business meeting for 5 hours.

>>70297921
You can say specific things like John's heroin problem/estrangement in general (Yoko helped here), Paul's ever expanding ego and role in management due to Brian Epstein's death, George frustrated that his masterworks were shunned in favor of Paul's granny shit.

But essentially at the start they were 4 lads. Then they got older, had money, got married, had kids, and when this all happens instead of spending all your time with the lads you spend it with your family.

I'm sure we can all relate to instances in our lives where we had a close group of friends that became splintered as we got older and "life happened".

>>70297921
didn't George fuck Ringos wife?

>>70298007
they all did

>>70298007
They all fucked eachother's wives. It was combination "free-love of the time" and "fuck this guy". Naturally this sort of thing is fine in theory until it happens and your blood is boiling.

File: 1902ed1537b5a018da48f3c6259888f7[1].jpg (65KB, 736x542px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 736x542px

>>70290836
I believe Queen is a way more revolutionary than Beatles, musically, for example.

Not the greatest, perhaps, but i honestly believe they did way more than they did.

Honestly, i find hard to listen to some of their songs aswell. And i'm very into 60's music. (The Beatles, on this case)

>>70290836
Yeah yeah typical "Beatles didn't do it Beefheart and Zappa did it they just didn't have make it appeal to everyone because theyre less selfish for some reason"

>>70298126
Even if you were right, band's like Queen literally formed because of the Beatles. They also did they best work years after the Beatles had broken up. Context matters.

>>70298126
>>70298257
http://forum.queensongs.info/forum.php%3Ftopicid%3D210%26idshift%3D0%26st%3D1%26mt%3D4%26shift%3D0

You can find stuff like this for every band of that time.

>>70297108
This is b8.

File: white boi.gif (4MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x480px

Whenever somebody brings up something revolutionary the Beatles did, some Anon is always quick to say "(Obscure Band) did it first". But does musical revolution matter if nobody hears it? I could revolutionize music in my basement, but it doesn't matter jack if nobody knows I did it. Maybe Captain Beefheart or Frank Zappa cut the Beatles off at the pass, but did anybody know they did before the Beatles, or did the more popular band bring attention to said revolutionary technique?

>>70291931
ill admit that thew isn't much that really sounds like it and it's pretty good but
like every thread fuck why....

>>70300184
Quality is also an issue. The Beatle's music was just really, really good. They touched on 10 different genres and each time was a delight.

Consider their career trajectory post-'64

Rubber Soul, into Revolver, into Sgt. Pepper, into the White Album, into Abbey Road.

That's fucking staggering. All of these works are not only totally distinct, really good. I think people react against the Beatles because they're popular and everyone likes them, but there's a REASON why. What other band can even approach such a run of albums? And if they do, how did people react?

Closest I can think of is Floyd from Dark Side through the Wall, or Radiohead from The Bends through In Rainbows. But none of those works were even as close to being as influential creatively or commercially.

>>70300833
Radiohead dicogrphay is better

File: 1465941074121.jpg (801KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

801KB, 1462x1462px

>>70291905
>that dude

>>70300870
Listening to both in 2017, I agree. But you have to consider when these things came about.

The Beatles were more groundbreaking and "better than the rest" in the 60s than Radiohead was around the millennium

Consider also that bands like Radiohead and that entire second wave of British bands grew up listening to and idolizing the Beatles.

But yeah if I never heard any music before now and I put in Revolver, the put in OKC, OKC would sound better. But that's not really a fair evaluation.

File: KinksTheKinks.jpg (68KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 300x300px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTTsY-oz6Go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOGMRnKl5co
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PVoVRUrxVY

>1964
Yet never mentioned in the development of rock music. Who else was playing guitar like that at the time?

>>70301327
The Kinks were hugely influential but your post makes its own point. They had a few songs and they didn't accomplish very much after those. It was typical of bands of the time to operate like that, it was not typical of a band to put out hit after hit after hit and top-to-bottom great album after album after album.

Consider where the Beatles went after '64, then consider where the Kinks went. No one is contesting the fact that the 60's a) had a lot of good rock acts or b) had a lot of influential rock acts.

Only artist from the 60s who matched their output creatively was Dylan. Even the Beach Boys fell off.

i used to also think that also but i found out i was an idiot when their genius hit me

>>70301406
>They had a few songs and they didn't accomplish very much after those
>ARTHUR
>THE KINKS ARE THE VILLAGE GREEN PRESERVATION SOCIETY
>FACE TO FACE


faggot who has never actually listened to the kinks and is speaking out of his asshole

>>70290836
Cuck band

>>70301497
Not him, I think his point is consistency. The Kinks didn't sell well especially in the US.

Countless great records and songs too but they're all spread throughout their career.

File: john-lennon-30-great-quotes[1].jpg (162KB, 1024x690px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1024x690px

>>70301327
Uh, John Lennon? Mind you, unlike Davies Lennon was actually experimenting with atonality and phrasing and 1964 found him introducing the deliberate use of feedback to rock music on I Feel Fine. The Velvet Underground, the Kinks' future records, and all of metal and punk owe their careers to John Lennon

>>70297921

These >>70297973 >>70297999 are solid answers.

The most encompassing answer is that they realized they'd run their course as a band and were flat out tired of working together.

George was tired of being treated like a lesser by Paul and had an immense backlog of songs most of which he would have never gotten to release on a Beatles album, John had his sights on a solo career/pursuing musical ventures with Yoko and had had a foot out the door for some time, Paul had the same idea with Linda, everyone was getting tired of John's shenanigan's in the studio and Paul's incessant micromanaging, etc. Even Geoff Emerick had grown weary of it all, having left in the middle of the White Albums sessions and had to be persuaded by Paul to come back for one more album when they were making Abbey Road.

Despite the fact that it was still tumultuous at times Emerick said the Abbey Road sessions were the happiest he'd remembered since Pepper because there was an understanding that this was going to be the last one.

I'm rambling but the bottom line is they were sick and tired of all the drama.

>>70302025
>George was tired of being treated like a lesser by Paul

it's messed up that he and everyone blame it solely on Paul when John said nasty things about George after the breakup and couldn't be assed to record on a bunch of his songs

>>70302287
John and Paul were bitter egoists and couldn't handle the fact that their lifetime third wheel by '68 had surpassed them in songwriting.

>>70302287
It's not all Paul's fault, but Paul was the one George was most sour at when they broke up. John could be surly and dismissive of George (and everybody for that matter) but Paul was constantly correcting his every move and the way George saw it basically treating him like a little brother rather than a band partner.

You could chalk it up to Paul just being a perfectionist, but to George it came across like he simply didn't believe he was up to the task and had to be demonstrated note for note how to play his songs.

This isn't to say George was never at fault in any of this either. I'm sure he could be an uncooperative grouch and a pain in the ass to work with too, but even by the mid-80s George and Paul weren't talking much and it's largely due to shit that went down during the Get Back sessions

>>70302613
I would have loved to see Paul and John's faces when they heard All Things Must Pass for the first time. Fucking idiots.

>>70302728
I'm sure they were just fine.

>>70302613
>didn't believe he was up to the task

What a stupid feud between two people regarded as some of the technically best musicians ever. Must be more to it.

>>70297831
What the fuck do you think Let it Be was?
Nothing more than a remake of A Hard Days Night but with out all the mad cap comedy and screaming girls chasing them everywhere they went. And Paul's grandfather was replaced by John's Yucko. Seriously. Same film just different year and longer hair. (And they were no longer "cute")

>And Yoko wasn't very clean either.

>>70295415
inb4 nirvana new beatles

>>70303929
There probably was. George did the very same thing to Paul when teaching him Something, giving him detailed instructions about every intricacy of the song.

I'm sure deep down even then they respected the hell out of each other's talent, but Paul usually had a very clear map about how he wanted each of his own songs to go, and he was most stringent on George. Probably cause John wouldn't take it and Ringo was so reliable on drums that they knew he'd handle it.

>>70290836
The Beatles invented Art Pop you mong.

File: paulgeorge_hcts.jpg (63KB, 492x700px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 492x700px

>>70304974
That and the whole thing with Paul seeing George as a little brother

That's probably why George might have felt it was "safer" to blame Paul in public, too, since he wasn't as volatile as John.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8A05fwhZw

>>70305262
Maybe. I get the feeling that John and George had grown somewhat distant close to the end and had relatively little to do with each other's songs by that point. George may have felt safer to point the finger at Paul but for him it really was more personal than it seemed to be with John.

>>70290836
>Captain Beefheart
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make

Don't ya think that maybe there was a reason that no one wanted to do anything like Captain Beefheart?

>>70290836
>Pink Floyd
Kek

>>70292161
YASS QUEEN SLAAY

>>70290836
>Revolutionized Rock music
Agreed, they did more or pop music than they did for rock and roll. The Kinks did more for rock and roll to be honest.
>Ahead of their time
Since they were doing mostly covers early on and since the Dave Clark Five were doing the same thing at the same time I would agree.
>Making music that no other artist would dare to make
Agreed, since the Beach Boys experimented with some really weird stuff. Though I don't think anyone said they were making music no other artist would make. I Am the Walrus is weird, but it's by no means edgy. The Doors were edgy. The acid rock and psychedelic bands that dominated the mid to late 60s were edgy. Long hair, drug and sex references, anti-war sentiments and John's "bigger than Jesus" comment were as edgy as the Beatles got.
>Was able to get out of their comfort zone and experiment
This I disagree with. The late 60s Beatles were very experimental, and it helped that the Beatles weren't limited to one sound.

They were a phenomenal band, but they did more for pop than rock.

>>70295772
Alright:
"The cuck fag A.K.A >>70295772"
"Pieces of shit and cucks (like >>70295772)
"The ultimate cuckness part II" feat. >>70295772
"I Am The Cuck" by >>70295772

That's 10 songs right?

>>70302728
ATMP pales next to Imagine and Plastic Ono Band anyway.

>>70290836
>captain beefheart
>not just an /s4s/ tier autist

>>70291049
>a pop boy band invented heavy metal
Might as well say that the Backstreet Boys invented heavy metal.

>>70306235
I disagree very strongly but respect your opinion

>>70304209
Are you mentally ill? Let it Be was recording sessions and a rooftop concert. Hard Day's Night was a film with a plot.

>>70290836
The Beatles > Beach boys

>>70290844
>why don't we do it in the road?

What did they mean by this?

>>70306327
But they did? Hleter Skelter? I want you?
Those songs are as metal as they get.

>>70308769
You can make the invented metal argument about three bands only
>Led Zeppelin
>Iron Butterfly
>Black Sabbath

>>70309702
Hendrix?

He was hugely influential in making rock and roll heavier and more experimental.

>>70309771
could you post a remotely metal hendrix song?

>>70309815
All of them you twat. They are heavy as fuck for their time. Christ just listen to Purple Haze and remember it was 1967.

>>70309815
I'm talking about amplification and distortion, the groundwork of metal and all heavy genres. Obviously he wasn't playing it himself.

>>70309998
oh no not 1967! It's suddenly METAL!!!
>>70310029
well then you could say that about any psychedelic blues rockers at that time
If you asked metal musicians who influenced them, I'm certain nobody would say Hendrix

File: Capture.jpg (33KB, 831x183px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 831x183px

>>70310279
>what is the evolution of music
Also you're moronic. Go educate yourself before you spew bullshit.

>>70310279
>Butler: I switched from rhythm guitar because a lot of the bands were getting into CREAM and HENDRIX and people like that. You're either a lead guitarist or a bass guitarist, and there was just no call for rhythm guitarists if you wanted to play that kind of stuff. When I went to see CREAM, [I] couldn't believe the way that Bruce played bass, and it sort of totally inspired me to take up bass. That's the direction I wanted to go in. Everybody in [SABBATH] liked CREAM and HENDRIX and ZEPPELIN, and I suppose it was a natural progression for us to get even heavier than they were.

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/black-sabbath-s-geezer-butler-talks-lyrical-inspiration-rock-band-iron-man-movies/#qSdejHp5d0yQmerh.99

>>70310279
>If you asked metal musicians who influenced them, I'm certain nobody would say Hendrix

yeah, nah

jimi is the best there has or ever will be, he will have influenced every guitarist worth their salt without a doubt. irrespective of genre or style

>>70310391
Show me the Hendrix in a Fahey track.

>>70291905
>"huhuh look at me I'm so cool that I don't even know who John Lennon is"

>>70290836
God, Lennon had such a punchable face

>>70310316
>>70310362
man you really got me with those famous musicians shouting out to other famous musicians
I don't know why I have to fight about jimi hendrix inventing metal how fucking retarded do you have to be
I'm not saying metal didn't come out of psych and blues rock
but calling hendrix metal ?

>>70311643
>but calling hendrix metal ?

Nobody said that, they were saying how he influenced the development of blues to rock to metal.