So is pic related going to be seen as the next trout mask

>>70132423
God I hope not

>>70132423
stop posting this shitty thread

Who here thinks the first actual track is not so bad

>>70133378
Yeah it's just meh. The rest is far worse.

WeEeEeEeEeEeEeeEeeEEEeEe wanted chaange

>>70132423
After 10 listens I'm starting to warm up to this album.

>>70133378
It goes on for 5 minutes too long

>>70132423
memememememememememememememe

Is Corey a bad people?

>le anthony fantano memes xD
There's no way OP isn't underage

File: YuOzZRB.jpg (33KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x333px

>>70134124
same. It's not really that bad and can be fun

reminder that test 1 is good

>>70135193
it's 6 minutes long yet the same 10 second section repeats throughout.

>>70135230
oh god true, i remember why i cant stand this album now, everything lasts too long. but the production on that song is pretty good for an album like this, but i wouldnt listen 6 minutes of it

its more varied than 10 seconds of it on a loop though,a nd then again there are classic songs built with tha t formula anyway