>le bush did 9/11!!! >8.6 BNM!!!! Is pitchfork the worst

>>70085671
probably, idk

It's honestly shocking that anyone takes anything this site puts out seriously.

P4K fell a while ago

>>70085671
should be a 5.6

>Cry about pitchfork
>Mock people who take pitchfork seriously
>Post about pitchfork continuously
>Don't ever discuss the numerous alternative music sites out there that could benefit from word of mouth on /mu/
>Wonder why people still go to p4k

really gets the synapses firing

>>70085671

well-deserved score.

>>70086882

also this, how come we never talk about TMT even though they are significantly better than P4K?

>>70086914
>also this, how come we never talk about TMT even though they are significantly better than P4K?

people like op care more about crying than actual music discussion

File: lol.png (529KB, 868x542px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 868x542px

>>70086164
>>70086882
These

Stop making posts about how awful Pitchfork is and contribute towards its inevitable and well-deserved irrelevance

>>70085671
t. Bush

>>70086914
>TMT
You mean the site that deducts points for albums if they come across as overly masculine?

>>70087031

??? The fuck are you talking about

It is a good album though

File: 1457842644684.png (700KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 500x500px

Are we going to get the best rap albums of the decade as a result of Trump's presidency?

>>70087081
It's definitely gonna make for some interesting music one way or the other

>>70085671
>getting worked this hard by El-P and Pitchfork
Lmao you guys are like the music version of marks in pro wrestling.

it's funny, often when i find a pitchfork review of some lesser known (not obscure, obviously, just lesser known than Solange and RtJ) music that I like through google, it's decent, quite informing, etc.

but then i read bullshit like this on /mu/

>>70085671
it's a good album, not worth a 8.6 but it's definitely better than the overrated piece of garbage that was RTJ2

File: dont understand.jpg (101KB, 1024x904px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x904px

>>70085671
why is /mu/ bitching so hard on pitchfork?

>>70087288
You're joking right?

>>70087798
no

>>70086882
woke

>>70085671
Yes it is, that album is pretty good though.

>>70086882
What review sites have better opinions?

>>70085671
pitchfork is a liberal site. Get over it.

>caring about bitchfork

there's the issue

>>70085671
Yes pitchfork is shit, but Bush did do 9/11.

>>70087046
he's probably talking about the last rtj album review

it would've got 9+ if mike wasn't a berniebro

>>70086914
>TMT

TMT is just as social justice wacko as Pitchfork, their shit just doesn't get posted.

Honestly the best reviews are still Scaruffi, as his biases are clear and he listens to everything.

>>70090598
>>70087013
Bush was too incompetent to do 9/11.

Best case scenario was he had foreknowledge, that's about it.

Killer Mike is the absolute epitome of a reddit fedora. Fucks sake I can't believe I ever enjoyed that stupid hack's bullshit music.

>>70091626
>thinking the president actually makes decisions

how naive. the american government had previously thought of using attacks on itself to manipulate the population. this time they went with it.

>>70085671
They should be executed for their Frances the mute review alone. 9/11 was an inside job tho buildings don't just symmetrically collapse at free fall into their own footprint tbhq baka lmao fhamalam

>>70091756
I agree, that's another reason I'm saying Bush DIDN'T do 9/11.

>>70091584

>the best reviews are still Scaruffi,

this desu