WHY DID SWANS DO THIS TO US https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfT yYn9_LH8

the fuck

um.. what

>>69950482
Because Gira earns only just enough to survive and takes any opportunity he's given, probably.

File: FB_IMG_1482609344295.jpg (42KB, 891x640px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 891x640px

Why is Swans considered good? Why are 30 minute repetitive and dissonant as fuck songs considered good? Also the vocals are super cringe

>>69950482
there's vomit in my mouth

>>69950586
flex your muscles anon :^)

>>69950482
This is the culmination of every previous Swans album, the advertising equivalent of Ben-Hur...or Kurosawa's Ran.

File: 1481753611562.jpg (2MB, 2136x1743px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2136x1743px

>>69950482
Thank larkin

>>69950586
Because you're too much of a pleb to enjoy them.

Who did it better? Macbeth or OP's video?

>>69950586
Usually I would debate you on that, but...

"Why is a lady staring sexily into the camera while tugging at her clothes to said "dissonant as fuck" music?" is the question we should all be focused on.

>>69950586
>Why are 30 minute repetitive and dissonant as fuck songs considered good?
why wouldn't they be? they're a nice cathartic experience
I know hating on Swans is all the rage recently, but if you think a long and dissonant song can't be good, you prolly have very narrow horizons

>>69950748
It's a Wolf of Wall Street scene, in case you didn't know.

damn

>>69950810
It's still shit

>>69950810
I don't remember a scene with Swans music in that film though

>>69950482
what the fuck, they weren't even credited