k

RAISED ON BIGGIE AND NIRVANA

>>69771757
Not even, I experienced the 90s at a young age

1970s > 1980s > 2000s > 1990s > 1960s > 1940s > 1950s > 1930s > not familiar enough with other decades to judge, and the 2010s are not over yet

i experienced 70s, 80s, and 90s, 80s was def better cause cocaine

>>69771757
Name ONE (1) better year for music than 1991.

>>69771895
1976.

>>69771895
1982

>>69771895
1971
2000
1997

>>69771895
1970

>>69771823

Name one innovative musical idea that was produced in the 2000s. Not a great song or album, but a new idea. The 2000s are literally just the 90's with more practice.

>>69771895
1884

>>69771895
1978

>>69771895
1969

>>69771757
Who is this

Reverse image search takes you to Dunlop tires

>>69771944
Innovation =/= quality of work

You have a lot of growing up to do, child.

>>69771966
dunlop tires

>>69771966
yeslah

>>69771966
dunlop tires

>>69771978

That's a wonderfully flushed out argument, father, but have you considered that the quality work requires the prior innovation to piggyback on to exist whereas the reverse is not true. The fact is that even a child can see the logical error of begging the question of whether the best decade is defined by the new materials generated through the alchemical magic of art or through the more workmanlike craft of assembling those materials into 'works' that are palatable to the market.

The fact that you don't even seem to question your own premises suggests that even grownups can have narrow understandings of complicated ideas.

I hope I don't grow up to be as narrowminded as you.

>>69771895
1959

>>69772092
holy shit

File: Nig Cigs.jpg (44KB, 601x516px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 601x516px

>>69772092
Name one kind of music from any era that didn't piggy back on an idea from a previous era, you smug little shit. I'm embarrassed to call you my son/daughter.

>>69772169

Aleatoricism

File: billion.jpg (116KB, 328x448px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 328x448px

>>69772185
>what is ambient noise

Get the fuck out.

>>69772203

When exactly do you think the 1940's occured in the chronology of decades?

>>69772203
could you not?

>>69772218
Long after the perception of sound
waves by humans.

>>69771944
sidechain

>>69771895
77

>>69771944
kanye

>>69772218
when exactly do you think anyone here cares about you in the chronology of existence?

>>69772235

So your argument is that the existence of hearing precludes compositional aleatoricism from being a new idea? The fact that sound already existed negates the idea?

>>69772298
Your argument is that it needed to be recorded before it was able to be a part of existential lexicon. It's sound. Not timed rhythm and melody.

>>69772169

The question was about ideas. Obviously every art is based on previous art. The point isnt that a new 'kind' of music emergered that was entirely unique, it's that new ideas are generated. Ringo played 'boom bap boom boom bap' in the 60's, it was a straight feel distinct from the swing rhythms of earlier rock and pop music, which set the stage for rock drumming to evolve into the basically straight 8ths basis it has used ever since. Ike Turner played a torn amp to impart a distorted sound to his guitar tone which was adpated via overdrive and then distortion pedals to become the standard tone of electric guitars as opposed to the clean sound of a Les Paul, who himself had created numerous novel ideas.

What is a new idea that was created in the 2000's that could be incorporated into the common stock of musical materials like the straight rock beat or the distorted guitar tone?

>>69771895
1967
1977

>>69772331

My argument was that it wasn't a musical idea until it was presented as such in a compositional context.

>>69771895
73

91 is not far behind though

>>69772243
sidechain exists since the 50s ... and there was kick induced pumping in electronic music in the 90s. listen to Homework by Daft Punk or Music Sounds Better With You and you'll hear it

>>69771966
dunlops like a truck

60 > 90 > 10 > 70 > 50 > 80 > 00
The first one is completely objective fact, the rest are personal opinion.

>>69772810
MODS

>>69772430
autotune

File: 830.gif (577KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 200x200px

>>69772810
>17 and a half

>>69771757
who is dat

>>69772475
Compositional context is a form of recording, yes? Your point? Btw, it should be mentioned that composition has nothing to do with aleatoricism. Composition is the opposite of Aleatoricism in a sense. It's composed of random sounds and ambient noise. At what point does the quality of the art come in?

>>69772944
halsey and her delicious butte

>>69771757
What a terrible outfit you can practically see her butt!

>>69771966
Halsey.

A vapid whore of an "artist" that's basically a monument to the fact that you can build a career on your body in irrelevant mediums.

>>69771757
poop zipper

>>69774112
what are you a faggot?

>>69771757
thats a butt

>>69772725
fuckin' nice

>>69771757
I agree with all of this except i think the 50s should be last

>>69771757
sauce on pic?

File: folder.jpg (178KB, 888x888px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 888x888px

no this

>>69774764
fuck man
i might cave and listen

>>69774123
>A vapid whore of an "artist" that's basically a monument to the fact that you can build a career on your body in irrelevant mediums.

sounds like a good fuck desu

1990's-2000's-1970's-1960's personally.
I think atleast, i just know that the 90's is my favourite. 2010's might be going in there somewhere, so far it's nice.

>>69771895
2036

>>69771895
2016

>>69771770
I'd raise my biggie in her nirvana if you know what I mean

>>69771895
1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1980, 1993, 1967, 1968, perhaps 1978, 1984, and 1994 aswell

>>69771895
2001-2004

File: 1476832083183.jpg (6KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x193px

>>69773101
>>69772475
>>69772430
>>69772331
>>69772298
>>69772235
>>69772218
>>69772203
>>69772185
>>69772169
>>69772092

artfags get out ree

>>69776410
>clueless pretentious adolescents samepersoning and calling themselves "artfags"

yeah but can we talk about the fucking poop zipper on those shorts or what

>>69771944
Heavy manipulation of samples. The earlier works in this domain, whether it be earlier 20th century classical turntable music like John Cage, sound collages like Negativland, or trip hop like DJ Shadow, didn't manipulate them to the extent they have were being manipulated in the 2000s. Such heavy sample manipulation gave way to entire new forms of sample based music in the 2010s like vaporwave and what Oneohtrix Point Never does on Replica.

There is just a big influence on manipulating a musical work as its given to anyone in general throughout the 2000s. The Disintegration Loops is recorded tapes done with shitty old tape that's actually degrading as it continues to be looped. Autechre's 2000s work is all centered on breaking apart each track to its individual bits doing some kinda inverse minimalism. A lot of 2000s electronic stuff has been like that where it really starts getting into the "micro" aspects of the music whereas most mainstream electronic stuff in the 90s still sounded like more conventional songs. It's like music finally caught up to what Musique Concrete was trying to do 50 years ago, but is actually able to do it thanks to more development in musical ideas and music technology ever since.

>>69777232
tape-beatles, john oswald, akufen
close but no cigar

>>69771895
2008

>>69772725
this is my opinion as well

>>69777270
>bringing up reverse tape looping
But that's not even close to what I was talking about.

>John Oswald
I already explained why it's different from sound collage guys like him. It's nowhere near as linear.

>bringing up Akufen
Akufen's first release was in 2001...

Actually the 80s were... the 1780s

>>69771895
1966

Prove me wrong! (Pro tip: YOU LITERALLY CAN'T!)