Are the outputs amplified? https://www.amazon.ca/Cerwin-Veg

bermp

>>69648741
no, line levels signals just as the inputs
but don't bother, it's shit

>>69649206
Why?

>uses a subwoofer

top kek

>>69649288
it's a tiny 8" driver in a small enclosure from the world's shittiest audio brand made to complement their completely useless tiny desktop speakers

>>69649306
For tiny speakers, it's kind of necessary
But getting a pair of big vintage full-range speakers from a thrift store is much better and cheaper if you have the space for it

>>69649316
It's just so hard to find a sub with TRS in and out

>>69649370
save up for at least something like the mackie mr10s, that cervin vega fart cannon does nothing good to any speaker system

>>69649393
I've got just about $300 CAD to spend. My speakers were $225 each.

>>69649417
then save up

>>69649423
Why is a decent sub so much more expensive than a decent monitor?

What about this?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/KRK-8S-v2-8-109w-Powered-Studio-Subwoofer-w-Class-D-Amplifier-In-MDF-Enclosure/351890396456?_trksid=p2047675.c100623.m-1&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D38530%26meid%3D6b3cf5906206490e8ec17431790daf8e%26pid%3D100623%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D6%26sd%3D231086128176

My speakers are KRK as well

>>69649442
much less of them are sold. active 'studio monitors' have a pretty small market share anyways and only like every 20th person who's interested in them even considers buying a sub to go with them

>>69649473
>8"
>35Hz, no level stated

you might just sell your speakers and get a pair of JBL LSR 308 for the same price

>>69649523
8" is twice as big as my woofer on the monitors