1. 70s 2. 50s 3. 60s 4. 90s 5. 00s 6. 40s and before. 7. 80s

File: l04he.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

>Can we all agree

It's looking a little upside-down. Let me help you out.

1. 90s
2. 00s
3. Today
4. 80s
5. 60s
6. 70s
7. 50s
8. 40s and before

>>69509746
1. 70s
2. 60s
3. 90s
4. 00s
5. 50s
6. 80s
7. 40s and before.
8. 10s

00s and 50s are interchangable for me

File: het!.jpg (25KB, 430x629px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 430x629px

>>69509848
>today at #3

I'll make it right

60s
90s
70s
today
tomorrow (20s)
50s
40s and before
80s

File: 1410730650925.jpg (209KB, 500x637px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 500x637px

>>69509848

>>69509746
>50s at #2
Wew

>>69509962
>golden age of Jazz and Blues
>inception of Rock, Funk and Soul
Are you a pleb?

>>69509988
Ok jazz and blues I agree
I guess I just prefer the rock music that was inspired by the 50s stuff on a personal taste level
I definitely respect that music tho, just not my thing

>>69509796
Dumb frogposter.

File: thumb.jpg (63KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 300x300px

1. 1967
2. 60s
3. 70s
4. anything else

can we all agree?

90s > 60s > 40s & before > 10s > 80s > 70s > 50s > 00s

>>69509988
funk rock and soul was much better in the 60s though

>>69509746
>60s anywhere but the top
60s
90s
70s
80s
2010s
50s
40s and before
2000s

60s
70s
90s
80s
00s
50s
10s
40s and before

>>69509746
>80s that low

File: 1481069607011.jpg (32KB, 471x417px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 471x417px

>>69509746
>40s and before
>higher than 80s

>>69509746

1. 90s
2. 00s
3. 80s
4. today
5. 70s
6. 60s
7. 50s
8. 40s and before

Sorry, but for the most part, music in the past was SHIT.

>>69509848
Horrible fucking taste.

>>69509848
>>69510433

Smartest ITT

>Rampant 60s worship for no reason

Jesus Christ.

1. Today
2. 80s
3. 00s
4. 90
5. rotting dog shit
6. 70s

The rest is too awful to listen to

>>69509848
>>69510433
Holy shit-taste, Batman.

80's
50's
90's
70's

everything else

>>69509746
>>69510413
>>69510318
>>69510191
>>69510079
>>69509932
>>69509853
>>69509848
>Formative Jazz decades and era of classical's biggest recording influence is consistently at the bottom
/mu/ everyone

>teens unironically liking 90s-today

God, I hate those indie/alternative shit eaters.

>>69509746
1970s
1980s
2000s
1990s
1960s
2010s
1940s
1950s
I listen to a lot of classical and big band music earlier than this as well, but I wouldn't have a clue as to when they were recorded.

>>69509853
>>69509932
>>69510079
>>69510191
>>69510318

Friendly reminder that anybody who puts 60s or 70s at the top does not actually have their own musical opinion and fell for the pre-internet magazine gaslighting back in the bad old days when boomers (who were aged 10-25 in the 1960s) had a monopoly on music publication outlets.

Sadly, their media victory and gaslighting was so complete that it permeates to RIGHT NOW, on the Vietnamese Candyland board that is supposedly supposed to question and overturn narratives ruthlessly. The earliest permissible "best decade" is the 1980s or you have been gaslit by Rolling Stone types.

File: disdain for plebs.jpg (26KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x462px

>>69510559
>The earliest permissible "best decade" is the 1980s or you have been gaslit by Rolling Stone types.

>>69510559
or maybe you're just outnumbered and feeling scared?

1. 00s
2. 90s
3. 70s
4. 80s
5. 60s
6. 40 and before
7. 50s
8. Today

1. 00's
2. 70's
3. 90's
4. 60's
5. 80's
6. 10's
7. 40's
8. 50's

>>69510433
Best tastes so far except I like 50's and 40's, 60's should be lower

>>69510559
1969-1975 was a pretty great time for prog. We had bands like Comus, Can, Faust, and Henry Cow, and even more mainstream bands like Yes, King Crimsons, and Pink Floyd releasing great stuff every year. The eighties sound had potential but only a few bands got the best out of it for some reason.