Which punk aesthetic do you prefer? The simpler look, or the more flamboyant look?
>>69496475
Well they're all posers dressing up for attention.
Rollins wore jeans and a t shirt
>>69496475
well one is outdated and the other isn't
>>69496625
I don't think the Ramones were posers. They had a bit of a gimmick, but at the most they were playing up the style that came naturally to them.
>>69496490
haha is that avey tare
>>69496475
Ramones > glue hair any day
>>69496625
the Ramones are wearing the same thing + leather jackets which were common back then
The one where they actually look like people.
>>69496625
This.
Punk attire is stupid if it's fitting into any kind of stereotypical, trendy mold. That always seemed to me the opposite of what punk was about. Maybe the edgy Mohawks and shit had a point to them when they were originally used by punks as a symbol of anti-conformity, but it eventually just became a trend. So really I thought the idea was always retarded.
>>69497204
Leather jacket are still common.
>>69497543
What a manlet
>>69497831
qt desu
>>69497822
Leather jacket are the shit
>>69497572
yeah
dressing "like a punk" isn't punk at all
>>69496625
>spelling it 'poser'
shut up poseur
>>69497572
Have you seen slc punk? Basically explains how dressing and acting punk isnt punk
The Patrick Stickles look, AKA the insane asylum look.
>how to embed on 4chan?
>>69498246
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YKdWBpXlc6E
Daily reminder that all punk rock is now dad rock.
>>69496475
neither.
stenchcore or crust for me
>>69496475
Right answer.
>>69496475
White teas and blue jeans. Anything else can fuck right off