>Suddenly Nirvana doesn't sound as innovative or

Wut there's like literally no correlation

Yeah okay son but Atomizer is infinitely better so...

>>69275693
How did it take you that long to figure out?

File: 1414265670541.jpg (107KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x333px

>>69275693
>ever thinking Nirvana sounded innovative or groundbreaking

Might as well post Hendrix wtf is this thread

>>69275806
This.

Not even Nirvana fanboys think that. Anyone who has heard of Pixies doesn't think that.

>>69275935
desu i see more similarities in Big Black than Pixies

but the only Nirvana album i like/listen to regularly is In Utero

>>69275973
What in the fuck big black songs sound like what in the fuck nirvana songs

>>69275973
the similarities to the pixies are more striking because both nirvana and the pixies were writing pop songs, but albini and co wrote punk songs

>>69275935
>Anyone who has heard of Pixies doesn't think that.
Talk about bands who were not innovative

>>69275693
>lack of solid songwriting
lol

>>69275693
>Nirvana doesn't sound as innovative or groundbreaking anymore

hey what if

get this

what if

that isn't the point?