What's the most technical and complex jazz? Doesn't

File: 8pVzL8q.png (179KB, 465x347px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 465x347px

>What's the most technical and complex jazz?

>Doesn't matter if it's wank, I just want to hear the most complex that is out there.

File: image.jpg (90KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 600x600px

This. I fucking love it to death.

>>69166054
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zC4kvW4S6mk

>ask for technical jazz
>people post free jazz
lol

>>69166251
are you dumb

>>69166307
shut the FUCK

yeah i wouldnt say free jazz is the most technical. like maybe cecils solo concerts but dave douglas, vijay iyer, and rudresh are probably the most techincal and wanky but i hate them so fuck it, go listen to the epic and choke yourself while you masterbate

www.easynicelifetime.com/music_catalogue_1.html

I don't know this guys name but this is really the most complex stuff I've ever heard, holy shit. Could be partially math-jazz, I analyzed it and it seems like he would follow tridimensional geometrical patterns, especially in the pieces he has released recently, also it's very, fucking, fast. Like a piece starts off sounding kind of ironic and some seconds later the instruments merge into a stream of audible diamonds and gold

If you're interested in individual players who are some of the best on their instruments technically, I'd say:

Chris Potter
Seamus Blake
Miguel Zenon

Woody Shaw
Alex Sipiagin
Brian Lynch

Simon Nabatov
David Kikoski
Fred Hersch

Kurt Rosenwinkel
Adam Rogers
Julian Lage

Christian McBride
Dave Holland
Scott Colley

Eric Harland
Ari Hoenig
Antonio Sanchez

>>69166734
nice

>>69166734
Oh and there are some older players who had technical abilities that may never quite be topped:

Art Tatum
Dizzy Gillespie
Clifford Brown
Paul Chambers
Elvin Jones