>when someone refers to the final track of King Crimson's

>>69091806
>being this much of an autist
You must be terrible to be around, anon.

File: 225e549a-9d8c-4979-96ef-82f48a8ec8ce_zpsnj2ajesj.jpg (40KB, 300x224px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 300x224px

It makes me angry too, anon. You are not alone. Crimson on brother

How does it makes you feel that I've never listened to this album due to the fact that it's not on Apple Music or Spotify

File: lastjune4.jpg (163KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 800x533px

>>69091978
no skin off my back

File: images-1.jpg (7KB, 256x197px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 256x197px

>>69091806 when someone refers to King Crimson's debut album as "In the Court of the Crimson King" instead of "In The Court Of The Crimson King (An Observation By King Crimson)"

>>69091978
I partially agree with this except for the fact that it's an old album, so I make the exception.
Although if an artist keeps their new music off of streaming services because they "don't like it" or some shit, then fuck them, especially if it's because it's exclusive. I haven't listened to Dr. Dre's last album in about a year even though I like it. I won't even buy the physical or digital from itunes until it's on all major streaming services.

>>69091993
>
qt

>>69092151
King Crimsons music is very much good enough to find by other means, you lazy fuck

>>69092225
Did you read the entire post? I said I make an exception for old music

>>69091978
Same

>>69092239
I called you a lazy fuck because you said there is music you wont listen to if its not on a streaming service. that's just stupid.

>>69092140
lel