What does /mu/ think of this track/Childish Gambino in general?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hZCsgcKa-g
donald finally made something that's not mediocre
>>69085270
good idea, bad mxing, contrived execution
>>69085270
WE ALREADY SAID IT WAS GREAT
>>69085270
better than what's become his norm. If it's the intro track, I'd listen to about 5 songs in.
its good but feels a little too sterile, not organic enough. Doesnt have enough of the soul that the Funkadelic and other stuff hes influenced by has. That may be a theme tho. Either way im excited for the album
I still want to know what the fuck the album cover is supposed to be
pretty fucking good
>>69086199
Looks like a really wide zipper encircling a black guy's head.
It's pretty good but could have been a little more rough. Seems a little too clean.
call me a normie but i like old gambino better
if the track were more concise i might like it better, but I feel like it's a bit too long winded and all over the place
regardless I could see myself liking this if he organized songs in this style better.
>>69087468
I have to say I reluctantly agree with you. Full disclosure, I'm not really one for drawn out outros unless they're doing something really spectacular ala Runaway, so the ending could have been a bit shorter. However, I do still think the beginning intro leading into the main song are timed alright