Which one... >is more consistent >is more enjoyable/charming

>>68914603

bork

now kys for asking

Both are their worst.

stop avoiding my filters faggot
I do not wanna see anything g.rimes related ever again

>>68914603
If you really have to ask you probably should seek professional help.

>>68914603
Art angles is pretty boring imo

>>68914603
Obviously Post on all accounts. You'd want to be a pretty massive pleb to think otherwise.

>>68914623
>>68914662
can you elaborate?

Art Angels has two good songs. The rest is forgettable crap. 6/10 at best. Maybe she should get a real producer and concentrate on learning how to sing and actually playing all that gear.

>>68914637
Fuck your filters and fuck you. Are you a faggot to be annoyed by a cool Canadian girl?

Post has 2 good songs, Art Angels has 3, so I guess Art Angels is better

>>68914623
>>68914641
>>68914649
>>68914662
>>68914705
You actually didn't prove anything. Explain your choices.

Why mu/tants act like morons when they see Grimes mentioned? Why they put Bjork on a pedestal and talk shit about the talented Grimes? Why?

>comparing shit with turd
dude...

>>68914735
Grimes is shit.

That's the prove

>>68914603
Post has 0 songs i actively want to come back to
Art Angels has 2
Post easily has better production but Björk never wrote anything i didn't feel was anticlimactic or just disappointing in terms of structure, and stuff
Grimes easily makes catchier hooks, and Kill V Maim has four of them in sequence

>>68914623
>>68914783
>but björk is classy and established
or what

>>68914603
Bjork. Its close though. Post is far from her best album (Homogenic or Medulla or Vespertine vs anything of Grimes would be easily Bjork), but I still think it has more innovation, better songwriting, better lyrics, and more variety

>>68914806
Bjork is lucky she's already established. If /mu/ existed in the 90s, she would be treated as Grimes now, maybe even worse. I'm 1000% sure about that.

>>68914603
I don't like Bjork and Grimes but at least Bjork isn't generic synthpop garbage

>>68914849
don't pretend that /mu/ has any influence whatsoever

besides, she was established even before her solo career

Both are probably their lowest points in terms of artistic value, honestly one of the reasons why I can't stand these albums because they feel so identical
those who unironically think that post is much better are massive edgelords

>>68914840
>Homogenic or Medulla or Vespertine vs anything of Grimes would be easily Bjork
Don't be so sure. Maybe Vespertine would stand a chance, anything else is patchy. Homogenic and Medulla aren't masterpieces, they only contain some great songs and the rest is filler. I don't get why people tend to sweep under the rug those much weaker songs from Bjork albums, like they never existed.

>>68914806
>Grimes easily makes catchier hooks
I dunno. Bjork really has her hooks down, especially on Post.

>>68914869
>grimes
>generic
if you listened only to this fucking album

File: Kate Bush classic 600.jpg (56KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x600px

Never for Ever is better than both.

>>68914869
>triggered
This says something about your shitty taste. There's nothing generic about Grimes' music (actually prove me wrong) and there's nothing wrong with synthpop.

And talking about "synthpop garbage", what about Bjork's tune "I Miss You" from Post??? You just can't praise Bjork (that includes this synthpop song) and talk shit about Grimes. Use the same standard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKSoBJ8WirE

>>68914910
How Headphones, The Modern Things, You've Been Flirting Again, Cover Me are catchier than anything from AA? These songs don't have any hook. Also I Miss You is sillier than anything from AA.

>>68914899
>filler on Homogenic

naaah

bork > grim

>>68914603
Stand the test of time? What in the world
Post was released in 1995 and made Bjork an international star. Army of Me and Hyperballad are still regarded as two of the best electronic songs of the 90s.
As for which is more more diverse... on Post, Bjork goes into trip hop, jazz, ambient, baroque pop and techno. Grimes sticks to (shitty) synthpop and dance pop.

Post is clearly the superior album and this is a really horrible comparison. It's obviously bait since it asks which one has the better singing.

>>68915882
They're both shitty alternative dance synth pop overall

>>68915882
not that I like grim, but bjork is literally nothing better than on this album you little pleb

>>68916008
than her*

Bjork in every single category

>>68914781
/thread

>>68914961
This is not synthpop, it's tribal house with a great brass arrangement. Far more out there and more interesting than anything on Fart Angels, and certainly not generic and Avril Lavigne-esque like Fresh Without Blood, for example.

>>68915947
Nothing generic about Post. It's well-written pop music with great instrumentation and production. It was a lot more critically acclaimed and, most importantly, respected than anything Grimes has ever put out.
Also, it's not synthpop, so you can stop saying that.

>>68916008
Except she is, objectively, and your shitty personal opinion is worth nothing.

Bjork would then go on to release the bold Homogenic, regarded as one of the best electronic albums of all time, and go into more experimental territory with Vespertine and Medúlla, establishing her status as one of the most acclaimed musicians of the last decades.
Who the fuck is Grimes even lol.

>>68915882
>implying post is not dance pop
You are not really smart, aren't you?

>>68915882
on Art Angels, Grimes goes into chamber pop, folktronica, experimental hip-hop, dream pop and synth punk. Bjork sticks to (shitty) synthpop and dance pop.

>>68916091
>well written = not generic
>it's not synth-pop
yeah ok.

Bjork easily.

Sick of seeing Grimes being compared to her all the time on here.

>>68916091
See, I prefer bjork to grimes, but this album in particular is literally art angels level pop. Thinking that this album is much superior is shit taste and/or huge hypocrisy

>>68916169
There is some dance pop on Post. I never implied that, you're just stupid.
Also there's nothing wrong with dance pop or even pop, stop being a child. This is not a "who is less mainstream?" argument.

>>68916199
You really suck at genres, don't you? Do you even know what chamber pop is? Explain to me how Art Angels goes into chamber pop territory.
Also, if you think all the string and brass arrangements on Post amount to just 'synthpop', I have nothing to say to you.

>>68916277
See, I'm not saying Post isn't pop. It's pop music, I have no problem admitting that.
But just because it's pop doesn't mean it's on the same level as all pop. Post is better pop than Art Angels. That's all

>>68916293
>You really suck at genres, don't you?
No, I don't.

> Explain to me how Art Angels goes into chamber pop territory
Literally on two songs, it's as much chamber poo as much as Post is jazz

>Also, if you think all the string and brass arrangements on Post amount to just 'synthpop'
There are lots of synths, and it's clearly (dance) pop, so yeah, you have nothing to say to me

>>68916252
Clearly biased. You choice is not valid because I'm sure you didn't even listen to Grimes.

>>68916293
>There is some dance pop on Post.
there's some dance pop on art angels, it's not only dance pop album as well
>you're just stupid.
it's interesting because I think the same about you
>Also there's nothing wrong with dance pop or even pop
I never implied that

>>68916277
>Thinking that this album is much superior is shit taste and/or huge hypocrisy
Exactly. The Bjork fans are huge hypocrites. Both albums have eclectic songs, from dance bangers (Army of Me - Kill V. Maim) to ballads (Headphones - Easily). They're easily comparable.

File: 1478122166209.jpg (7KB, 249x240px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 249x240px

>>68916199

>>68916504
What did he mean by this?

>>68916315
> Post is better pop than Art Angels
why?

>>68916423

Uh, I like Grimes, I just like Bjork more, why are you being so defensive? Just because I prefer someone else you're "SURE" I've never listened to her...I've said that before here and got pretty much the same response, wouldn't be surprised if it was from you. I don't think they need to be compared all the damn time, let their work stand on their own. You're a hypocrite as well, you're biased for Grimes.

>>68916383
It's Oh So Quiet is literally big bang vocal jazz. This is not up for debate. Bjork GOES into jazz on Post.
Chamber pop is indie pop inspired by lounge music. Grimes does not make indie pop at all, and neither does Bjork, by the way.
As for Post being synthpop, I just don't hear it. There being synths doesn't automatically make it synthpop. Shit is not that literal. OMD, Japan, Depeche Mode, The Knife, that's synthpop. I've never heard anyone refer to Bjork's sound as 'synthpop'.

File: 1472609772983.jpg (15KB, 357x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 357x360px

>>68916293
>Grimes sticks to (shitty) synthpop and dance pop
> there's nothing wrong with dance pop or even pop

>>68916586
It's better written, more interesting, more diverse and has better arrangements and singing.

>>68914603
Grimes won't be remembered in 5 years

jesus christ fuck off

>>68914603
>>68916293
>Grimes sticks to (shitty) synthpop and dance pop
>*someone said that bjork is dance pop*
>there's nothing wrong with dance pop or even pop
ftfy

>>68916639
I said Grimes' brand of synthpop/dance pop is shitty. I was not saying the genres are shitty.

>>68916673
I said Grimes makes shitty dance pop, not that dance pop is shitty. Thought it was pretty obvious, but apparently not?

>>68916639
>hating entire genres like a moron
Pleb

>>68916668
so you are a prophet, huh?
there are lots of acclaimed artists and also newcomers who confirmed to be influenced by grimes, including Death grips

>>68916662
>It's better written
exclusively subjective
>more interesting
exclusively subjective
>more diverse
>>>68916199
>has better arrangements and singing
exclusively subjective

while posting all these subjective arguments bjorkfags are acting like post and art angels are like day and night, and everyone who compares them is retarded/deserves to die
that's very hypocritical

>>68916785
that's not what I implied you dummy, read the whole chain before replying next time

>is more consistent
Post
>is more enjoyable/charming
I like Post more.
>is more diverse
They're probably equal in this respect.
>is more innovative
Tough call. Probably Post.
>has the better singing
Post clearly.
>has the better songwriting
Post, but Art Angels isn't bad.
>has the better lyrics
Tie.
>has the better production
I like Post's production better, but I think Art Angels had weird "bad" production as kind of a statement.
>has the better artwork
I actually prefer Art Angels.
>deserved the acclaim
Both deserved their acclaim.
>will stand the test of time 10 years from now
Post has already stood the test of time. I think Art Angels has a fair chance of also standing the test of time.
>overall is better?
Post

>>68916755
but post is synthpop as well
so you mean bjork is shitty too?

>>68916623
>confirming that didn't listen to grimes' music
that's almost unexpected

File: sc.png (5KB, 467x87px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 467x87px

>>68916668
>Grimes won't be remembered in 5 years

>Mon Nov 19 22:27:31 2012 No. 30316417
>still don't know understand mu's obsession with this chick

In 20fuckin12. You're very delusional if you believe for a moment she will cease to be relevant in 5 years from now.

>>68916941
How come? You're saying Grimes makes indie pop inspired by lounge music?

>>68916988
Hey, that was directed at me... don't even!

>>68916801
+1. Good points, anon. Most Bjork fans are really delusional. Even if Bjork did some dance pop/synthpop on her first 2 albums they will refuse to admit the evidence. They just want an excuse to shit on Grimes' work at any price. That's pathetic.

>>68916833
Fair enough. IMO I'd replace Post with AA on most categories.

>>68917032

Oops, sorry! I thought you replied to my post >>68916592

>>68916662
All, subjective. You did nothing to support your views.

>>68914899
I disagree. Personally, I don't find any songs on Homogenic to be filler,and while Medulla is certainly an album for people with very specific taste (if you don't like one song from it you'll hate the whole thing) I find every song vastly interesting

>>68917032
I said before that there's not many chamber pop in her album. You better read the whole chain before replying next time

>>68916988
Just admit that you suck at genres then because she used to make indie pop, and you still can hear indie pop roots even in some art angels songs

>>68914893
I agree that the'yre both the worst albums for both artist but Post is definitely unironically better. Post still has redeeming qualities while Art Angels is th same 2 songs over and over again

>>68917140
> Art Angels is th same 2 songs over and over again
that's not true, there are different influences in almost each song

>>68917122
So, it's just a matter of taste. IMO all Grimes' albums are vastly superior to Bjork.

I listened to Bjork's music for many years before discovering Grimes. Bjork is too patchy, some amazing songs and many underwhelming ones. The difference between singles and the album tracks is too high. Ask the Bjork fans to name their favorite songs from each album and you'd see mostly the same lists. Ask the Grimes fans the same and you'll see much less homogenic lists. Why? Because her music is more uniformly great.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Grimes/comments/5b0wpg/favorite_and_least_favorite_songs_from_each_album/

>>68917140
>while Art Angels is th same 2 songs over and over again
You didn't even listen to the album! How are songs like Kill V Maim, Scream, Realiti, California, Life in the Vivid Dream, Artangels, Easily, Butterfly, Belly of the Beat identical to each other?

Seriously, listen to the album first before commenting about it.

>>68917104
Not him, but of course it's subjective, that's stupid.
I could say Liszt is a better composer than Grimes and it'd still be subjective, wouldn't it? Don't point out the obvious, we're all discussing opinions here.

>>68917301
I've listened to it. All of those are very similar; her voice never strays from its familiar patterns, whereas Bjork's can range from angry roars to beautiful light melodies (though in post it doesn't vary too much admittedly). Also, the production on all those songs remains very very similar

This discussion is so fucking boring

>>68917694
>boring
>78 posts
Then visit more interesting threads, like this one >>68917021

they're both terrible singers
björk is completely ignorant to rhythm and grimes barely even has a voice

>>68917942
>grimes barely even has a voice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGLvUejoRb4

File: Björk - Vespertine CD Cover Shoot Los Angeles, California, USA, (2001) [M M Paris] 03.webm (3MB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x540px

I'm don't know how grimes sounds like

>>68919222
Like an electro angel.

Both are great
now fuck off

these threads sure make me respect the grimes

>>68920602
autism

>>68920627
faggot

>>68914735
>>68914680
I'm not gonna spoon feed you, faggots

>>68921316
please do

File: Bjork_-_Homogenic_album_cover.jpg (168KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 400x400px

>>68914603
I started listening to Bjork (just Post) a while ago and I like it. Some boring songs but good ones too.
Anyways I'm listening to Homogenic which apparently is more popular and acclaimed, but it's really boring? It just seems slow and with no catchy rhythms and more annoying vocals.
Am I not getting it or something? Do I have to listen to it a bunch of times before it clicks?

>>68921469
Don't think it's going to be another catchy pop record. Turn your brain knob for something a bit more ethereal and atmospheric than her other records

>>68921598
That makes sense. It's just hard to switch off and let the music do its thing when she's yammering on top of it super loud and all over the place.

>>68916091
>Bjork would then go on to release the bold Homogenic, regarded as one of the best electronic albums of all time
Perhaps, but consider your own words in the context of their overall careers:

Years spent by Bjork professionally exercising her musical talents before Post: 18

Years spent by Grimes professionally exercising her musical talents before Art Angels: 5

>>68915882
>Post was released in 1995 and made Bjork an international star.
By your own words (assuming this was also you) it took Bjork 18 years to achieve international stardom (with Post.) Grimes first managed to achieve international stardom with 2012's Visions, meaning that what took Bjork 18 years of work to accomplish (with lots of musical helpers/collaborators btw) only took Grimes 2.

>>68916801
>including Death grips
src please - for posterity's sake

>>68914603
this isn't even a legit question this is just "is bjork bjork or are you a fucking idiot

>>68921866
>Years spent by Bjork professionally exercising her musical talents before Post: 18
>Years spent by Grimes professionally exercising her musical talents before Art Angels: 5
Bingo! Grimes didn't even showcase the whole extent of her talent yet. If Grimes was able to make such a great album after just 5-6 years of music career, she's a bigger talent than Bjork in my book. Her next album could be very well her own Vespertine:
>As she closes the door on this album, Boucher has a calmer project in mind for the next: “I’m really vibing on making something really slow and gorgeous that just breathes, and has room to breathe. I feel like my work has always been fast paced, kinetic, and almost just manic and I feel like for me the hardest thing I can do is make something that’s slow and heavy. I’m so ADD in my work; I really want to push myself into something that would be slower and more reflective.”

>>68914771
these bots are getting only slightly more believable

>>68921980
This thread is for intelligent people. If you're a dumbass with no arguments go to /pol/.

File: Björk - Vespertine CD Cover Shoot Los Angeles, California, USA, (2001) [M M Paris] 04.webm (3MB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x540px

>>68921980

Do you know what really separates Bjork from Grimes? Grimes put much more emphasis on songwriting and melodies. Because of that she's labeled as pop very often.

>>68921749
Her voice is not for everyone which is understandable

>>68917677
>her voice never strays from its familiar patterns,
How are Grimes' vocals in these two songs even remotely comparable?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUe9rnucPoU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqizZtfcDfA

>whereas Bjork's can range from angry roars to beautiful light melodies (though in post it doesn't vary too much admittedly)
Bjork's been singing professionally for over 39 years. Of course she's gonna have developed a lot of vocal variety over that entire time. This thread isn't about making judgments based on the entirety of her career - just Post, an the years leading up to it.

>>68914603
Easily Bjork. Grimes is cancer.

>>68922235
>Grimes is cancer.
>leting his hate against her fanbase lead his mind

>>68914603
>>is more consistent
Bjork
>>is more enjoyable/charming
Bjork
>>is more diverse
Bjork
>>is more innovative
Bjork
>>has the better singing
Bjork
>>has the better songwriting
Bjork
>>has the better lyrics
Bjork
>>has the better production
Bjork
>>has the better artwork
Bjork
>>deserved the acclaim
Bjork
>>will stand the test of time 10 years from now
Bjork
>>overall is better?
Grimes.

Just kidding, Bjork.

>>68922324
>Just kidding, Bjork.
No. You already said it:
>overall is better?
>Grimes.

No more backpedalling allowed. This is serious business.

>>68922274
>Lazy unfinished soundcloud-tier generic-ass beats with shitty """""singing"""""" over it is actually good, just ignore the fans!
No. Her music sucks too.

>>68922566
>Her music sucks too.
Based on what? Your taste? Is that even relevant?

>>68922566
>Grimes is cancer
>indirectly admitting he initially insulted her fanbase when talking about her
Are you 12?

File: 1464569003706.jpg (1010KB, 3461x5230px) Image search: [Google]

1010KB, 3461x5230px

we all know the winner

>>68922745
Grasping at straws there, buddy.

>>68922707
Yes, this thread asks what people's tastes are. I'm not saying Grimes is objectively shit. But I sure think she is.

>>68922783
Your taste is objectively shit. Happy now?

>>68922889
I'm happy if you are.

>>68922566
Lol I think you underdid it on the air-quotes. Might wanna add a couple so people will take your opinion seriously.

>>68922770
Winner of what. A battle? or The War? >>68921866

ITT: people just can't prove why they think Bjork > Grimes. "Just coz I say so" isn't a solid argument.

File: 1162296.jpg (445KB, 1929x1286px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1929x1286px

Reminder that Bjork was 30 and had a 18 years career when she did Post, her most similar album to Art Angels. Grimes was 27 and made music for only 6 years. Just to put things into persepective.

>is more consistent
post
>is more enjoyable/charming
post
>is more diverse
post
>is more innovative
post
>has the better singing
post
>has the better songwriting
post
>has the better lyrics
post
>has the better production
post
>has the better artwork
post
>deserved the acclaim
post
>will stand the test of time 10 years from now
post, and it already has
>overall is better?
post

>>68924992
>>will stand the test of time 10 years from now
>post, and it already has
Lol remind me never to ask you for financial advice. or solutions to logic problems Or answers to questions of taste.

>>68925167
post, a 7/10 at best, is a classic when compared to art angels

get over it.

>is more consistent
Art Angels
>is more enjoyable/charming
Art Angels
>is more diverse
Art Angels
>is more innovative
Art Angels
>has the better singing
Art Angels
>has the better songwriting
Art Angels
>has the better lyrics
Art Angels
>has the better production
Art Angels
>has the better artwork
Art Angels
>deserved the acclaim
Art Angels
>will stand the test of time 10 years from now
Art Angels
>overall is better?
Art Angels

Post is overrated and you know it.

>>68925560
>a 7/10
And you took that rating out of your ass? Art Angels is not a classic yet because obviously it's too new. But it's a future classic, mark my words. It's AOTY 2015, ffs.

>>68925560
>post, a 7/10 at best, is a classic when compared to art angels
Of course it is. It's been out for 21 years - Art Angels for 1. Are you by chance the same genius who posted this? >>68924992

>consistent
AA
>enjoyable/charming
Pretty subjective
>diverse
Both
>innovative
Both
>singing
Post
>songwriting
AA
>lyrics
Post
>production
Both
>artwork
AA
>deserved the acclaim
Both
>test of time
Post is still highly regarded and I believe AA will have a lasting effect on those who know of it now.
>overall
AA

File: 1422294237871.jpg (532KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1600x1200px

>>68914603
I haven't even read all the questions, but Björk wins them all, given that they are all "which has BETTER x".

Seriously if you think Art Angels is anything more than a 4/10 then you need to crawl back into your mother's vagina and have yourself aborted.

I haven't even listened to Art Angels, but I don't need to listen to it to know it's shit.

>>68926199
>I haven't even listened to Art Angels
This is the representation of 90% of people on /mu/ that shit on Grimes. I guarantee it.

>>68926199
>I haven't even listened to Art Angels, but I don't need to listen to it to know it's shit.
I don't know if this is some shitty trolling or you're a moron of monstuous proportions.

Bjork fans, everyone. Way worse than the Grimes fans.

>>68926283
also because you're annoying

>>68926289
Hey, now. I'm major fan of both. This anon just needs a little bit of... special help.

>>68926283
Exactly. These imbeciles say her music is shit without even listening to it.

>>68914603
Well that' easy, Bjork of course.

>>68926365
>not supporting the indie outsider

>>68914637
This desu

File: Björk - En Aparté interview in full (2004) 05.webm (3MB, 592x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 592x480px

>>68926365

File: 1470172844341.jpg (14KB, 203x303px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 203x303px

>>68926283
>>68926354
>>68926283
Nah, I've listened to Grimes' whole discography at least 3 times and I still think her music is garbage.

Her voice is annoying, her synth is pretty generic. Plus she's a pretentious cunt and looks like a globin from RuneScape.

I don't like Bjork either, but at least Bjork made original stuff and Grimes has not

"b-but she's cute a-and"
Just fuck off, please. You grimesfag need to seek a doctor.

>>68926380
>>68914717

File: 1448597237798.jpg (740KB, 2500x2433px) Image search: [Google]

740KB, 2500x2433px

>>68926550
>Plus she's a pretentious cunt and looks like a globin from RuneScape.
fucking kek

True btw. I didn't even begin to mention how fucking insufferable Grimes is as a person.

>>68926283
I've listened to visions and that was shit, why should i bother with a watered down version of that?

>>68926289
Grimesfags are literally the most cancerous faggots on this board. And that's saying a lot considering the other fanbases here like CHVRCHES.

>>68926550
>her music is garbage
>RuneScape
>I don't like Bjork either
Shouldn't you be checking your mailbox to see if that new Avenged Sevenfold album has come in yet?

File: 1477814788132.jpg (43KB, 500x430px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x430px

>>68926550
>Nah, I've listened to Grimes' whole discography at least 3 times and I still think her music is garbage.
Nice lie. I bet you didn't even listen to an entire song of her. You're actually a pleb that couldn't get into her music and you're mad because of that. Prove me wrong.
>I don't like Bjork either, but at least Bjork made original stuff and Grimes has not
Another lie. Prove it that Grimes has not. Go ahead.

>>68926648
>True btw. I didn't even begin to mention how fucking insufferable Grimes is as a person.
The nicest Canadian is fucking insufferable? Projecting too much?

>I've listened to visions and that was shit, why should i bother with a watered down version of that?
Get some taste pleb. Visions sounds shit to you because you got used to shit music and you're allergic to good music.

File: image.jpg (35KB, 428x287px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 428x287px

>>68926648
>Art Angels
>a watered down version of Visions
HAHAHAHAHAHA W E W

>>68926790
LMFAO, indeed! This >>68926354

File: 1469590727597.jpg (30KB, 396x400px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 396x400px

>>68926688
>Avenged Sevenfold
Sure, why not? Even Avenged is better than Grimes.

>Nice lie
Lol, is this your reply?
>I bet you didn't even listen to an entire song of her
I did. Several times.
>You're actually a pleb that couldn't get into her music and you're mad because of that
Pleb for not liking or "get" (theres nothing to get in Grimes' music) generic synthpop?
>Another lie. Prove it that Grimes has not. Go ahead.
Do you want me to list every synthpop artist before Grimes? Go to RYM and se by yourself, retard.

>>68926883
forgot to quote: >>68926695

>>68926199
Lol. I bet you've never listened to Post either. You are a pathetic disgrace to the art of music and this entire board. I bet your parents tried to lose you in the hospital after you were born.

>>68926823
LMFAO! Ahahahah!!

Kill yourself grimescuck

File: claire boucher.jpg (94KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x480px

>>68914603
>Which one...
>>is more consistent
Bjork
>>is more enjoyable/charming
Bjork
>>is more diverse
Bjork
>>is more innovative
Bjork
>>has the better singing
Grimes
>>has the better songwriting
Bjork
>>has the better lyrics
Grimes
>>has the better production
Bjork
>>has the better artwork
Bjork
>>deserved the acclaim
Bjork
>>will stand the test of time 10 years from now
Bjork (kinda cheating since she's already managed to stay relevant as a solo act for over 20)
>>overall is better?
Bjork

i'm a girl btw

File: 1473871307022.jpg (4MB, 2487x3730px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2487x3730px

>>68926550
>AT LEAST 3 times
That's quite a commitment there for something you claim to think is "garbage"...

>>68926883
What a generic reply. You stupid fuck, just because her genre is synthpop (only in general, because there are influences from many other genres) it doesn't mean her actual music is generic. It's like calling The Cure generic because they're another post-punk band.

Liking or not, Grimes has her own sound. You could post all synthpop artists here, it doesn't mean they're similar to her. Get it, dumbass? Go ahead and post REAL similar artists to her. If you can.

And yes, you're a pleb for failing to get into her music. Reasons: you genuinely tried but failed or you didn't even try. Pick one.

>>68927047
>that image

Typical grimescuck delusion. All other things aside, you retards turn tens of people against her music here everyday

>>68927047
He lied. He listened to half a song at best. All these raging haters didn't even bother to listen to her music.

>>68926983
>better singing
>Grimes
kekasaurus kex

>>68926648
>Grimesfags are literally the most cancerous faggots on this board.
>Sabotaging your point with your own post
Lol

>>68926950
>being mad because the truth >>68926354 hurts
Stay mad asshole

>>68914637
I'd suggest trying a different board - ideally one unrelated to music. Trust me, you you won't be missed here.

>>68927129
He's too mad irl. He just couldn't control himself anymore. It's rich for that dude to accuse an entire fanbase of being cancerous while behaving himself like a cancer.

>>68927047
You know, her discography isn't big. I listened 3 times in 3 different period in my life. All of them in one day. It's not really hard. The last time was when AA came out.

>That's quite a commitment there for something you claim to think is "garbage"...
I started thinking her music is garbage after the third listen. The other two I just didn't like and I let in my arquive for another try.

>>68927094
Yes, I'm lying. It makes you feel better, doesn't it?

>>68921943
Andy Morin is subscribed to her Instagram, plus his beats sound like sped up grimes beats, and he obviously was using the same synths, for at least 4 albums in a raw (not sure about Jenny Death)

>>68927125
Bjork has a significantly wider range, and isn't afraid to experiment, but that also means that at times it can be a bit grating to listen to.

Grimes doesn't have the range, or the technical skill, but she sticks with what she has and is consistently "good" with her voice

Overall Bjork is a significantly better vocalist, who isn't afraid to go above and beyond "just singing", like using her voice as an instrument

>>68927093
>you retards turn tens of people against her music here everyday
No offense, but trollish types like you don't properly count as people.

>>68926550
Don't even like grimes but
>looks like goblin
it's so obviously a bait post it makes me surprised how many replies you got, are grimesfags really this stupid?

>>68927296
This >>68927093 btfo!

>>68927398
You're stupid. We ignored that part because it's obviously bait. We attacked his other (I dare to say) shitty points.

>>68926289

I disagree, Bjork fans are generally friendly, accept that other people have different opinions and don't say "Oh, you haven't listened to her" if you say you don't like her, at least on here. Also Bjork fans don't make nearly as many threads like these, comparing her to others pretty much every day, as a poster said I think some Grimes fans on here do turn people off her which is a shame.

>>68927211
>The last time was when AA came out.
In which case you have only actually listened to her entire discography once (assuming you're telling the truth.) Were these also you? >>68924992 >>68925560

>>68927282
>Overall Bjork is a significantly better vocalist, who isn't afraid to go above and beyond "just singing", like using her voice as an instrument
Lol - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhNxvoXOKcI

>>68927398
>Responding to b8 because no one else was stupid enough to fall for it...

>>68927531
>Nah, Bjork fans are generally friendly,
Ha ha ha ha! They're even more annoying than the Grimes fans. Proof ITT:
>>68914623
>>68914641
>>68914662
>>68914840
>>68914869
>>68915882
>>68916091
>>68916252
>>68916623
>>68916668
>>68916684
>>68917140
>>68917677
>>68919222
>>68920602
>>68921980
>>68922235
>>68922324
>>68922566
>>68922770
>>68925560
>>68926199
>>68926550
>>68926648
>>68926883
>>68926950
>>68927093
>>68927211

Way, way more annoying.

File: popstar_masterminds_in_lairs.jpg (253KB, 2259x480px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 2259x480px

>>68926550
>goblin

>>68927553
>>68927662

File: 2738942735892364.jpg (5KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 259x194px

>>68919222
mmf that areola

>>68927237
Cool - didn't know that.

>>68921943
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgshhTHxSNc