Do audiophiles actually care about music or just how their speakers

I'm not sure but it seems like audiophiles always seem to have shit taste in music

>>68756723
audio quality is important, but i'm not gonna act like there isn't a ton of snake oil bullshit in the audiophile "business"

>>68756862
What do they listen to outside of Steely Dan?

File: Centipede_Hz_album_cover.jpg (978KB, 1000x1000px)

978KB, 1000x1000px

Some albums can only be appreciated on high end headphones

>>68757090
Yeah, like every chiptune album.

Some, but a lot only like things like Steely Dan because of immaculate production.

>implying you need to spend thousands to get an audio setup that sounds better than bluetooth speakers and apple earbuds

i think theres a certain level of audio quality that should be cared for. Ive heard some nasty quality headphones and those pill things have high end like tv static. I fuck with brands like koss and jvc that have cheap headphones and buds with nice even sound.

>>68756723
>being this triggered
dirt poor and/or underage faggot detected

>>68756723
I caer more about how the music is mixed and mastered. I hate that people make music that's meant to sound good on shit speakers.

>>68758221
>maybe if I call him triggered, I won't need to refute him

>>68758371
What argument is it that I'm supposed to be refuting?

>>68758417
Maybe if you read the OP, you'd know.

>>68758455
All I see is a question, nothing to refute

>>68756723
There are two types of audiophile: people who only care about equipment and sound quality, and those who care about equipment and sound quality BECAUSE it makes the music they love sound better.

>>68758473
Then answer it properly.

>>68758505
Shame the latter is rare.

>>68758514
So I don't need to refute anything?

Where is your answer to the question?