>Download album with SLSK >V2 MP3, fair enough >open

>>68385418
sometimes it has a release or two that's not on What or Rutracker, but they tend to be poorly tagged, like your experience.

You can edit tags with Foobar you know.

>>68385690
>editing tags manually when it can be done automatically
>editing tags when they come perfect from what.cd

>>68385706
>editing tags manually when it can be done automatically
Precisely the thing OP did.

So why all the fuss over tags?

>>68385418
least intuitive autist currently on /mu/?

>>68385418
just download it again from someone else

>>68385418
>mild tagging inconveniences
*triggered*

damn near every issue you've got there would have been easily solvable if you just bothered to use your eyes and brain

i found what.cd to be disappointing as fuck once i finally bothered to go through with the interview

i was thinking that it was gonna be full of super rare shit that you can't even find on slsk and that the reason that you couldn't find it on slsk was because the what users were just so super dedicated to not sharing it with outsiders

imagine my disappointment when i got in and realized that not only did what have only a fraction of the shit that was readily available on slsk, but that even the shit that what did have was mostly already available and shared on slsk without having to bother with the ratio and interview shit

what a fucking waste of effort

>>68385817
t. someone who downloads 128kbps mp3 trannies with no tags

>>68385860
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humility

>>68385860
>false dichotomy
looks like i was right >>68385805 here lol

>>68385860
the only time i download 128kbps shit is when the shit i'm looking for is so #rare that only 128kbps rips of it exist

>>68385900
>>68385860

>>68385914
The only reason 128kbps are the only things that exist are because people are idiots who don't know how to rip, which they never learn as long as software like SLSK enables that kind of behaviour

>download FLAC album from slsk
>2 tracks fail accuraterip verification
>welp
>finally acquire wcd account, download FLAC of same album from wcd
>same 2 tracks fail accuraterip verification
welp

>>68385936
it's mostly because the rippers want to encourage the people to buy the physical release but ok

>>68385918
hey you know it's okay to admit you're being a shortsighted fool now and then

>>68385936
>implying soulseek is the arbiter of that behavior
idiot
see:
>>68385805

>>68385418
Why don't you just check the files in slsk before you click download? It's not hard.

>>68385936
eh, i'll take what i can get
that sort of shit is usually so limited and difficult/expensive to obtain physically that i'm just happy to hear it at all

>>68385986
because he's the >>68385805

>>68386016
>trying to enlighten someone with a legitimate mental defect

Do you even know who Hampus is? He has the emotional maturity of a child, you're wasting your time.

>>68386098
>He has the emotional maturity of a child
Nah, he's just swedish.

>>68386098
i do know who he is, it's just fun to expose his shortsightedness

>>68386124
lmao ay-oooo

There's absolutely nothing funny about this fucking cyberbullying and all it does is prove that /mu/ is nothing but another off-shoot of /b/ and your awful fucking humour belongs there.

Go fuck yourselves. All of you.

>>68386216
Nice classic meme.

The reason most albums on slsk are in 192 and V2 is because they're old scene releases. Scene groups wouldn't allow any other formats until 2006-2007.

File: 7695348682_1a094de51d[1].jpg (42KB, 298x322px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 298x322px

>>68386231
>yfw

>>68386231
>using a caricature of yourself as a scapegoat to open your mouth again after getting BTFO

What a filthy little narcissist you are.

>>68386385
see
>>68386098

File: file.png (310KB, 416x450px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 416x450px

>>68386385
>mfw disgusting SLSK pedestrians think I was BTFO because they're content with downloading 192kbps trannies with no tags and horrible file names
>mfw he thinks because I'm not replying it means I am "defeated" and not just doing something else

>>68386426
lol have you ever actually used slsk
it's nobody else's fault that you're too retarded to actually watch what you're downloading

>>68386426
>>mfw he thinks because I'm not replying it means I am "defeated" and not just doing something else

>implying you didn't just reply to >>68386216 because it was the most forefront shot against your ego

Who do you think you're fooling here, honestly?

Not even gonna bother to address that SLSK bit, if you don't want to learn then don't bitch.

File: file.png (339KB, 500x291px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 500x291px

>>68386536
>mfw there are still, in 2016, people who think >>68386216 was a serious entry and not made in jest
>mfw people legitimately think that it's in any way demeaning or "a blow to my ego"

>>68386506
>mfw there are people who are too stupid to know you can't know a tranny from a proper rip without first downloading all the data
>mfw people are actually defending the quality of Kazaa4Muzak™

>>68386619
>implying it's relevant to you that it was made in jest

You clearly couldn't help but make >>68386231 this damage control post regardless. Just so onlookers don't "get the wrong idea about you," right?

What a filthy little narcissist you are. [2]

>>68386619
>mfw there are people who are too stupid to know you can't know a tranny from a proper rip without first downloading all the data

this has yet to happen to me but then again i'm not a retard so what do i know

i think that the whole "SLSK is full of people transcoding shit just to fuck with other people" thing is just a meme forced by what.cd users bitter that they wasted time and effort on getting in on a useless meme tracker desu

File: file.png (135KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 236x236px

>>68386743
>make fun of something that is supposed to be mean to me
>omg ur a narcissist
>get upset at something aimed to be mean
>lmao ur so easily troled
>ignore something that's posted
>lol u got btfo and left
The only winning move is to never play

>>68386802
>thinks only retards end up downloading trannies from SLSK when there's no way to check before the download is finished
Just admit it, you've never checked a single of your files and your hearing/equipment is bad enough that you couldn't tell a 32kbps rip from a lossless one.

>>68385706
lmao try dowoading a classical release from what.cd sometime

>>68386848
>implying I give the slightest shit about Soulseek in the first place

Stop with the mental gymnastics and grow up.

That's not even how this scenario is playing out anyway, which should be obvious but unfortunately isn't for you because you have no self-awareness.

>>68386848
>>lol u got btfo and left
you didn't leave though

>>68386848
>Just admit it, you've never checked a single of your files and your hearing/equipment is bad enough that you couldn't tell a 32kbps rip from a lossless one.

i check when there's a reason to check, such as dudes sharing stuff exclusively in one specific bitrate, dudes sharing higher bitrate versions of stuff that was previously only available in lower bitrate versions and so on
so far, i've yet to encounter these much-feared lossy transcodes
i think you might just be a bit of a dummy desu

>>68386848
Are you trolling or are you legitimately this stupid?

>>68386908
>telling me to stop the mental gymnastics when you're wringing yourself into a proper mess trying to get me upset

>>68386985
Your conclusion does not follow from the rest of your post.

>>68387011
Nice post.

>>68387159
>Your conclusion does not follow from the rest of your post.

oh, i think it does

>>68387195
>I have never encountered a transcode on SLSK
>Therefore you are dum
Nah son.

>>68387159
I'm actually trying to help you be more intuitive and humble but that's interesting how you're interpreting all of this as an attack on your person and that's it.

>>68387215
That's literally not the point he was making. Still drinking?

>>68387237
>I'm actually trying to help you be more intuitive and humble
Shuuuure you are buddy, especially following my impressivly pompous and inhumble defense against the first post by simply respoding to an obvious inflammatory attempt with "nice meme lol".

I hope you're seeing the irony in all of this lmfao

>>68387266
>this is what autism does to your self-awareness

What an utter shame.

>>68387306
Nice post

>>68387266
Nice watery defense mechanism?

>>68387345
meant to quote
>>68387326

It's all in the name of posterity, Hampus. You'll see it when you grow up a bit.

>>68387368
>I'm actually trying to be nice and help you, not attack you, funny how you interpret it like that
>Wew grow up
>you have no self awareness lmao autism
Watch out for the helpiest helper :^)

Are you getting tired of trying yet? Realising that you don't really have a case at all?

>>68387385
Even more defense mechanisms and reductionist attitudes.

Yeah, I am pretty tired of trying. You're obviously hopeless.

>>68387437
Yeah, you're literally destroying my defense and I have to retort to Freudian defense mechanisms to preserve my poor psyche, sad sad me.

Let me try what you're doing, it seems fun!

Lol you have no self-awareness, you can't see that? Fucking autistic. You'll understand when you grow up. No, I'm not even TRYING to be condescending, I'm just trying to help you be more humble, as I am flawless and can see your every flaw. Haha, you actually responded? That sure is defense mechanisms at action right there!

Actually, that wasn't fun at all. I don't know how you do it, I'd be exhausted in no time!

good threads lads

>>68387491
if all you see in this entire thread against you is sensationalist buzzwords then you're even more hopeless than i thought

File: RG0BS1U.gif (2MB, 390x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x205px

>>68387527
He's doing it again, the mad lad! Gotta give you props for your tenacity.

>>68387546
slow down for once tiger lol

>>68387581
Best post so far in this entire comment chain

>>68385418
I haven't had Soulseek in over a year and I don't miss it.

>>68386906
Don't remind me, I've had some Alfred Schnittke string quartets stuck at 83% for a week.

You can always use RuTracker, too.

>>68387637
so what do you when you can't find an album on rutracker or what

>>68387738
> what do you when you can't find an album on rutracker or what
YoutTube, Blogs and asking around. If I'm really desperate I can just buy the release. Frequently I'll just find something else (another performance or composition altogether) if I can't find it right away.

I'm not sitting in my room listening to obscure improv pieces for 12 hours a day, so I don't run into this problem as much any more.

>>68385418
>download album with SLSK
>filter to 320kbps or FLAC if I feel like it
>download finishes
>tags are perfectly fine because I know how to use slsk because i'm not a blind retard

File: 1476121991227.jpg (75KB, 540x748px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 540x748px

>>68385418
>Foobar
while we're on the topic, what's a good alternative to itunes? something that my ipod can still connect to, obviously.

>>68386216
Hahaha yes I forgot about this
RIP hampy

File: hey guess what.jpg (59KB, 428x336px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 428x336px

>>68388317
>filter to 320kbps or FLAC
see >>68386619
> you can't know a tranny from a proper rip without first downloading all the data

>>68388396
I use Clementine, I think I remember being there a plugin to sync somewhere.

>>68388396
Assuming you cant use foobar cause youre an apple fag? Clementine

>>68388436
>>> you can't know a tranny from a proper rip without first downloading all the data
I know this. But am I more likely to get a proper rip from an album that claims to be 320kbps or 128kbps?

File: clementine.png (7KB, 215x71px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 215x71px

>>68388459
>>68388436
w-what

>>68388781
please help