Let's say humanity invents an AI that is able to create

>>68277360
It will sound like top 40 music because those songs are already written using algorithms that make music sound more "appealing"

>>68277667
I'm talking about a genuinely creative AI that can create art and experiment in the same way a human would.

>>68277696
It would need to have unique experiences and complex emotion.

>>68277706
Let's say it does, it's hypothetical.

>>68277667
Holy shit anon is blowing the lid off the whole operation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcGYEXJqun8

>>68277725
The real question is would we treat it like a human?What would the difference between us and it be? Just flesh? Does it have consciousness, aka is it aware?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSHZ_b05W7o

>>68277878
>>68277816
but that's all based on human models. shit

>>68277926
Well sony does want the next hit.

Only way for this to happen is to code a brain... Just code a brain... simple neural pathways ... ??? Why hasnt science done this yet ???

>>68278083
Because science can't.

Only god can create a soul.

Emily Howell does exactly this. A press of a button and BOOM!

People need to stop posting the Sony CSL meme because it's misleading and doesn't actually have true creative process nor actual finalization.